FaujHistorian
ELITE MEMBER

- Joined
- Apr 20, 2011
- Messages
- 12,272
- Reaction score
- 43
- Country
- Location
Mossadegh was a nationalist and he paid the price for nationalizing the Iranian oil company which angered the British and the USA. Whether he was a communist or not is upto debate but even if he was a communist, he was still democratically elected by the Iranian people. Shah had no right to overthrow an elected Prime Minister at the behest of the British and the Americans.
Any individual and especially a leader who knowingly takes his country to instability should never be called a nationalist.
Based on his actions, Musadiq should instead be called ANARCHIST.
You gotta get your definitions straight bro!, you gotta get your definitions fixed.
peace
p.s. True nationalist leaders should be the ones like the Chinese, South Korean, Japanese, and Germans. These leaders are deliberate, patient, and hardworking and keeping their countries safe from instability and anarchy.
Remember a country is a like a boat in a big ocean. And the leaders are like boatmen.
Should a boatman purposefully tilt and shake and destabilize and rock his boat? Heck no!
In fact if a bigger ship or tanker in the area, a big whale under the sea, a true "nationalist" boatman would do his level best to keep his people calm and his boat stable.
Unfortunately people like you prefer the leaders who turn their boats upside down by jumping up and down, and doing gali galoch with every passing ship.