What's new

India wants Narendra Modi & not Rahul Gandhi as PM

I have clearly specified "IF" he becomes PM, this is my personal opinion as to what steps he can take, if you have any problem or if you think that he will take a different course than put your points here. Obviously, a democratic country selects it's leader assuming as to what he/she will do after winning. If you favor any other leader as PM of India, than put the points as to what steps he will take, than we can decide more fairly.

Let us choose our leader by a good debate not by bashing each other, this is no argument that since 'x' is alleged to be bad i will chose 'y', if people vote in this way than only god can save our country.

I respect your personal opinion...No issue with that. But the points u have mentioned are already happening. So in that sense what extra impact can he bring in?

U talked about debate..lets go and debate. Kindly provide me any proof of his leadership being anyway better than say, Sheila Dixit in Delhi, Nitish Kumar in Bihar, or govt. in Tamilnadu, Andhrapradesh and Maharastra? From 1991 to 1998 the average growth rate of Gujurat was at 9.8 and the decade under Modi, Gujurat saw an average growth rate of 10.5.

So what monumental he has been able to achieve? He is all hype....no substance.
 
Strange that muslims in gujarat who were affected by riots love modi and those who were unaffected by riots hate him.

On what grounds is there a case against modi anyways?
Taking 48hrs to get full army brigades in ahmedabad unlike congress which took 20 days to get the army in delhi in 1984.
Even the deobandis in gujarat praised him until the head office fired the poor guy.

Modi has been the victim of the largest organized politically motivated propoganda campaign in the history of india.
and nobody bothers talking about the congress party's role in the riots.
the person leading the rioters at godhra staition was a congress municiapl corporator and till date no case against him.
congress is a party of hypocrites which itself was to blame for the riots but went on blaming modi.
 
I respect your personal opinion...No issue with that. But the points u have mentioned are already happening. So in that sense what extra impact can he bring in?

U talked about debate..lets go and debate. Kindly provide me any proof of his leadership being anyway better than say, Sheila Dixit in Delhi, Nitish Kumar in Bihar, or govt. in Tamilnadu, Andhrapradesh and Maharastra? From 1991 to 1998 the average growth rate of Gujurat was at 9.8 and the decade under Modi, Gujurat saw an average growth rate of 10.5.

So what monumental he has been able to achieve? He is all hype....no substance.



I don't know how qualified you are in data interpretation. If you really want debate lets debate. Do you know what is growth rate and how this figure should be interpreted????

Let me give one truth: The developing nation with 10% growth rate is good growth, while a poor country with 10% growth rate ois below average. 10% growth rate for developed countries is Miracle. Developed nations' growth rate lies within 2-6% , Developing nation lies btwn 7-15%, for Poor nation its lies btwn 15-30%.

If Gujrat is still growing @10% and more then its miracle.. If Bihar (My native state) and UP growing 10-12% then its very normal. To atch Gujrat Miracle they have to grow @20-25% growth rate for 5 years, then 10-15% for next 5 years, then 8-10% per anum...


Got it Modi Hater...


Strange that muslims in gujarat who were affected by riots love modi and those who were unaffected by riots hate him.

On what grounds is there a case against modi anyways?
Taking 48hrs to get full army brigades in ahmedabad unlike congress which took 20 days to get the army in delhi in 1984.
Even the deobandis in gujarat praised him until the head office fired the poor guy.

Modi has been the victim of the largest organized politically motivated propoganda campaign in the history of india.
and nobody bothers talking about the congress party's role in the riots.
the person leading the rioters at godhra staition was a congress municiapl corporator and till date no case against him.
congress is a party of hypocrites which itself was to blame for the riots but went on blaming modi.


Gujrati Muslim love Modi coz he saved many Muslims. His prompt act brought peace within a week. In less than 3 days Paramilitary forces were on ground...

Gujrat riots were spontaneous, there was no prediction of it. Gujrat was not ready for such kind of crime ( committed by both community). Both side innocents only died..
 
I don't know how qualified you are in data interpretation. If you really want debate lets debate. Do you know what is growth rate and how this figure should be interpreted????

Let me give one truth: The developing nation with 10% growth rate is good growth, while a poor country with 10% growth rate ois below average. 10% growth rate for developed countries is Miracle. Developed nations' growth rate lies within 2-6% , Developing nation lies btwn 7-15%, for Poor nation its lies btwn 15-30%.

If Gujrat is still growing @10% and more then its miracle.. If Bihar (My native state) and UP growing 10-12% then its very normal. To atch Gujrat Miracle they have to grow @20-25% growth rate for 5 years, then 10-15% for next 5 years, then 8-10% per anum...


Got it Modi Hater...

Thanks for the economic capsule course, but I don't need this. I mentioned states which are bigger economy (U chose only Bihar, I don't know for what reason) and larger geography (Delhi is an exception in my list) and which attracts 2to 4 times more FDI than NAMO's Gujurat. Specifically Maharastra which is far ahead of you in industrialization and attracts the FDI without Vibrant Gujurta kind of drama.


Gujrati Muslim love Modi coz he saved many Muslims. His prompt act brought peace within a week. In less than 3 days Paramilitary forces were on ground...

Gujrat riots were spontaneous, there was no prediction of it. Gujrat was not ready for such kind of crime ( committed by both community). Both side innocents only died..

I don't have any problem if Muslim love Modi. I don't need the ratification of Muslims to support a person. I have my ideological reason to hate this Hitler in making.
 
Thanks for the economic capsule course, but I don't need this. I mentioned states which are bigger economy (U chose only Bihar, I don't know for what reason) and larger geography (Delhi is an exception in my list) and which attracts 2to 4 times more FDI than NAMO's Gujurat. Specifically Maharastra which is far ahead of you in industrialization and attracts the FDI without Vibrant Gujurta kind of drama.


I don't have any problem if Muslim love Modi. I don't need the ratification of Muslims to support a person. I have my ideological reason to hate this Hitler in making.

Thanks you understand Number Game. Lets me make u understand some other point.
a) Higher FDI in Delhi and Mumbai (Maharastra) : Is due to there status of capital, one is national capital other is Financial capital. Maharastra Growth is not inclusive, one hand Mumbai, Nagpur is growing, other side Farmer are suciding. Gujrat is perfect model of inclusive growth.Maharastra is no match to Gujrat in social indicators.

b) NaMo is not Hitler, Hitler killed Jews, Modi saved Muslims. His promot action saved many valuble Muslim life, So Gujrati Muslim love him.

c) As a PM he can serve better to Indians. Muslims are not alien, they are indian, they must talk to Gujrati Muslim and start loving Modi..
 
I respect your personal opinion...No issue with that. But the points u have mentioned are already happening. So in that sense what extra impact can he bring in?

U talked about debate..lets go and debate. Kindly provide me any proof of his leadership being anyway better than say, Sheila Dixit in Delhi, Nitish Kumar in Bihar, or govt. in Tamilnadu, Andhrapradesh and Maharastra? From 1991 to 1998 the average growth rate of Gujurat was at 9.8 and the decade under Modi, Gujurat saw an average growth rate of 10.5.

So what monumental he has been able to achieve? He is all hype....no substance.

Stockholm syndrome.
They gotta tow the line or they know what can happen to them.
 
If he does get popular vote, then Modi deserves to be PM.. whether his views on Muslims may or may not(although Rahul Gandhi has been more open in his anti-Muslims statements) be similar to Goebells and Jews.. if secular India wishes for it.. then it must be.
Surely he must be better than some spoilt kid riding some dynastic leftover.
 
The Muslims in your miserable Nation are being SLAUGHTERED ( as in Gujarat ) and their Religious places are being DEMOLISHED ( as in Ayodhya ).

Is that the nation you are bragging about ?
PEHLE APNE DESH ME JHAK:blah::blah::blah:
 
Thanks you understand Number Game. Lets me make u understand some other point.
a) Higher FDI in Delhi and Mumbai (Maharastra) : Is due to there status of capital, one is national capital other is Financial capital. Maharastra Growth is not inclusive, one hand Mumbai, Nagpur is growing, other side Farmer are suciding. Gujrat is perfect model of inclusive growth.Maharastra is no match to Gujrat in social indicators.

b) NaMo is not Hitler, Hitler killed Jews, Modi saved Muslims. His promot action saved many valuble Muslim life, So Gujrati Muslim love him.

c) As a PM he can serve better to Indians. Muslims are not alien, they are indian, they must talk to Gujrati Muslim and start loving Modi..

Oh..thanks for appreciating my understanding...lets get down to dissect your claims:

  1. So..the higher FDI in Karnatka will be because of technology capital and Chennai would be because of Automobile capital....When Ahmadabad is planning to be some capital? Oh...social indicator u also understands....nice....but alas...the following does not conform your claim:

    Human Development Report 2011: Gujarat fares poorly on malnutrition levels | NDTV.com

    Industrialised Gujarat fails to score in social sectors - Indian Express

    It seems u don't do your home work...u people just love to jump from one branch to the other.....


  • Oh...he saved so many..thank god....I am fortunate to hear such a nice story. U made my day. You cannot gain the support of Muslim by banging you head....little smile on face will do.

TATHASTU NARENDRA MODI AMAR RAHE:tup:

Abhi oh khushi ka khabar nehini aya hey ........when he will be eligible for that "Amar rahey" u can definitely chant...
 
If he does get popular vote, then Modi deserves to be PM.. whether his views on Muslims may or may not(although Rahul Gandhi has been more open in his anti-Muslims statements) be similar to Goebells and Jews.. if secular India wishes for it.. then it must be.
Surely he must be better than some spoilt kid riding some dynastic leftover.

The Americans diplomat think he is incapble, they have hopes for Pranab Mukherjee as the PM.
 
if not for Gujarat riots, I would have supported Modi wholeheartedly

but due to this blot, i am against Modi becoming PM
 

Govt has to play an enabling role - provide roads, electricity, water, educational facilities etc, and without corruption. Modi has done all that. CMs like Shiela Dixit on the other hand have to earn money for Sonia and Rahul, who need a luxurious lifestyle.

Sometimes some social trends are very stubborn, and cannot be change fast.

But Modi is taking action on even those areas -

Shala Praveshotsav will bear fruit after some fifteen years in the form of a fully literate Gujarat state: CM « Home | www.narendramodi.in

Kalam lauds Gujarat's success in agriculture | Business Standard

Gujarat has least unemployment rate among all states, says latest report released by Government of India | DeshGujarat
 
Oh..thanks for appreciating my understanding...lets get down to dissect your claims:

  1. So..the higher FDI in Karnatka will be because of technology capital and Chennai would be because of Automobile capital....When Ahmadabad is planning to be some capital? Oh...social indicator u also understands....nice....but alas...the following does not conform your claim:

    Human Development Report 2011: Gujarat fares poorly on malnutrition levels | NDTV.com

    Industrialised Gujarat fails to score in social sectors - Indian Express

    It seems u don't do your home work...u people just love to jump from one branch to the other.....


  • Oh...he saved so many..thank god....I am fortunate to hear such a nice story. U made my day. You cannot gain the support of Muslim by banging you head....little smile on face will do.



Abhi oh khushi ka khabar nehini aya hey ........when he will be eligible for that "Amar rahey" u can definitely chant...



With All due respect I can debate you, and I can answer your all query but I will not. I have made a rule for me, I don't engage in discussion with ppl having posts lesser than 2000. It so happen that some member make the ID to make other ppl loose there control and finally get bann..

I have only one account, and I don't want to bann..

Sorry I couldn't saw it while I replied you first.


if not for Gujarat riots, I would have supported Modi wholeheartedly

but due to this blot, i am against Modi becoming PM

I respect your position, I hope You had same position for Rajeev Gandhi (Indian King) and Mulla Mulayam (Mulayam is known with this name) and Thakrey, coz all of them were in rule when riots happen..


Wait a minute, King of King Rajeev Gandhi became PM. O! I got it , Crime is crime only when it is done against Muslims, Its not crime if its done against others..
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom