What's new

U.S. Plan Widens Role in Training Pakistani Forces

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
U.S. Plan Widens Role in Training Pakistani Forces

By ERIC SCHMITT and THOM SHANKER
Published: March 2, 2008

WASHINGTON — The United States military is developing a plan to send about 100 American trainers to work with a Pakistani paramilitary force that is the vanguard in the fight against Al Qaeda and other extremist groups in Pakistan’s restive tribal areas, American defense officials said.

Pakistan has ruled out allowing American combat troops to fight Qaeda and Taliban militants in the tribal areas. But Pakistani leaders have privately indicated that they would welcome additional American trainers to help teach new skills to Pakistani soldiers whose army was tailored not for counterinsurgency but to fight a conventional land war against India.

Even though the training program would unfold over several months, it is being disclosed at a time of heightened operations in the unruly tribal areas along the Afghan border. At least eight people suspected of being Islamic militants were killed Thursday in a triple missile attack on a house used for training in the tribal areas.

For several years, small teams of American Special Operations forces have trained their Pakistani counterparts in counterinsurgency tactics. But the 40-page classified plan now under review at the United States Central Command to help train the Frontier Corps, a paramilitary force of about 85,000 members recruited from ethnic groups on the border, would significantly increase the size and scope of the American training role in the country.

United States trainers initially would be restricted to training compounds, but with Pakistani consent could eventually accompany Pakistani troops on missions “to the point of contact” with militants, as American trainers now do with Iraqi troops in Iraq, a senior American defense official said. Britain is also considering a similar training mission in Pakistan, officials said. A spokesman at the British Embassy here declined to comment.

“The U.S. is bringing in a small number of trainers to assist Pakistan in their efforts to improve training of the Frontier Corps,” Elizabeth O. Colton, a spokeswoman for the United States Embassy in Islamabad said in an e-mail message. “The U.S. trainers will be primarily focused on assisting the Pakistan cadre who will do the actual training of the Frontier Corps troops.”

Ms. Colton declined to specify how many American trainers would participate or where their bases would be. But other military defense officials said that the number of American trainers could grow to about 100. The increased training program is another sign, with intensified secret strikes in Pakistan against terrorist suspects by remotely operated Predator aircraft, of the Bush administration’s growing concern and frustration with Pakistan’s inability to do something about Al Qaeda’s movements in the tribal areas.

The proposed expanded training program is modest compared with the much larger training efforts under way in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is said to offer scant likelihood of blossoming into a much larger American combat presence. American officials are also acutely aware of Pakistani sensitivities to any United States military presence in the country, even trainers, and spoke largely on the basis of anonymity because of the diplomatic concerns and because the plan had not been formally approved.

Until now, American officials have worked closely with President Pervez Musharraf on counterterrorism policies, including training programs. The landslide victory by Pakistan’s opposition parties in last month’s parliamentary elections adds a degree of complication and confusion to any long-term military planning of this sort because it is unclear to what extent new leaders like Asif Ali Zardari, the head of the victorious Pakistan Peoples Party and the widower of the former prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, will embrace those policies.

American officials are also taking a number of other steps to help increase Pakistan’s long-term ability to battle a newly resurgent Qaeda and other extremist groups in the tribal areas.

At the request of Pakistan’s new army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, the Central Command two weeks ago sent a four-person intelligence team, led by a lieutenant colonel, to work closely with Pakistani intelligence officers in Islamabad. The Americans are helping with techniques on sharing satellite imagery and addressing Pakistani requests to buy equipment used to intercept the militants’ communications, a senior American officer said.

The United States is also helping to establish border coordination centers in Afghanistan just across the Pakistan border, where Afghan, Pakistani and American officials can share intelligence about Al Qaeda and other Islamic extremist groups in and around the tribal areas.

The Pentagon has spent about $25 million so far to equip the Frontier Corps with new body armor, vehicles, radios and surveillance equipment, and plans to spend another $75 million in the next year. Over all, a senior Bush administration official said the United States could spend more than $400 million over the next several years to enhance the Frontier Corps, including building a training base near Peshawar.

The training proposal now under review at Central Command headquarters in Tampa, Fla., which oversees military operations in the Middle East and much of South Asia, is subject to the approval of the commander, Adm. William J. Fallon, and top Pentagon officials, including Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates.

Admiral Fallon said in an interview at his headquarters last week that additional trainers would be part of “a comprehensive approach” to address Pakistan’s security needs. “They want to do as much of this as they can themselves,” Admiral Fallon said.

Pakistani officials said they were aware of the Pentagon’s general offer for more trainers, but were not familiar with the details of the Central Command plan.

That document, titled “Plan for Training the Frontier Corps,” envisions a combination of Special Forces and regular Army troops working with the Frontier Corps in basic marksmanship, infantry skills and counterinsurgency techniques, defense officials said.

Until recently, the Frontier Corps had not received American military financing because the corps technically falls under the Pakistani Interior Ministry, a nonmilitary agency that the Pentagon ordinarily does not deal with. But American and Pakistani officials say the Frontier Corps is drawn from Pashtun tribesmen, who know the language and culture of the tribal areas, and in the long term is the most suitable force to combat an insurgency there.

American and Pakistan officials acknowledge that it will take several years to build the Frontier Corps into an effective counterinsurgency. American officials say they have seen some Frontier Corps militia wearing sandals on patrol and wielding barely functional Kalashnikov rifles with little ammunition.

The need for such training is evident. In January, hundreds of Islamic militants attacked a paramilitary fort in the restive South Waziristan tribal region in northwest Pakistan, killing 22 soldiers and taking several others hostage. An American military official said the fort was overrun in part because the commander failed to range his artillery properly before the attack.

“Pakistani military operations in the Federally Administrated Tribal Areas have had limited effect on Al Qaeda,” Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told the Senate Armed Services Committee last week. “Pakistan recognizes the threat and realizes the need to develop more effective counterinsurgency and counterterrorism capabilities to complement their conventional forces.”

Robert L. Grenier, a former director of the C.I.A.’s Counterterrorism Center, told a panel of the Council on Foreign Relations last week that any high-profile American military presence in the tribal areas or the neighboring North-West Frontier Province would be “the kiss of death.”

But Pakistan, he said, would welcome small numbers of trainers who kept a low profile, and were not involved in combat operations. “To an increasing degree as they see that it doesn’t cause the sky to fall, they will be willing to accept low-level support from the Americans, particularly in the form of training,” said Mr. Grenier, a former C.I.A. station chief in Islamabad.

Mr. Grenier added that the role American trainers played would rest largely with General Kayani, the new army chief. “He’s a very conservative, very cautious fellow,” Mr. Grenier said. “He will want to make his own decisions as to what is sustainable and what is not in the way of U.S. support.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/world/asia/02military.html
 
Neo - a very comprehensive and good article - i fully support this initiative, we need training in CI ops.
 
I was reading an article published in Jang more of a news that increasing number of US military and CIA officials in pakistan even for the training purpose can hurt pakistan's own interest followed by an argument that in the past the killings of the chinese in pakistan had a hand of CIA and RAW.
Today again in Jang a news quoting the interior minister General Hamid Nawaz saying that US, Afghanistan and India are involved in creating troubles within pakistani tribal areas. He also said that things have started to workout on that side of the border and getting worse on this side.
I did try to find out the english version of this article but to no avail.
Any comments on this?
 
Pakistan should take any assistance that is given.

Terrorism cannot be condoned!
 
i guss , no harm getting support to get trained for this genertion of S .OP .FORCES. pakistan has a very exellent force but yes, pakistans conventional ground forces need next genertion of training , its imedietly needed.

other, reservations showen by pakistani officials also, very concerning for pakistan and also for the rest of the region, i mean , countries like, IRAN & CHINA RUSSIA and even INDIA were watching all these moves by US , its very worrying and intense.

i , guss that its importatant for pakistani officials , to make sure that any one comming to pakistan for doing anything no matter what! shouldbe restricted to thier tasks and shouldnt be allowed to explore pakistan by thier own.

it wouldbe better , that pakistan make its image clear in the eyes of the international community, because right now its not good, pakistan is being called a state runned by CIA.
 
US trainers in Pakistan, more to come

* Trainers could join soldiers fighting militants
* ISPR says FC proposed training centre​

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon is planning to send about 100 US military trainers to Pakistan to assist a the Frontier Corps, The New York Times reported on Saturday. Citing unnamed US military officials, the newspaper said that small teams of US special operations soldiers had already been sent to Pakistan to train Pakistani counterterrorism troops. But a classified plan, now under review at the US Central Command, would increase the contigent of US trainers to about 100, the report said. “The US is bringing in a small number of trainers to assist Pakistan in their efforts to improve the Frontier Corps,” Elizabeth Colton, a spokeswoman for the US Embassy in Islamabad was quoted as saying.

Accompanying troops: A senior US military official said the trainers would initially be restricted to Pakistani bases. Britain is considering a similar training mission, according to the report.

FC training centre: Inter-Services Public Relations spokesman Major General Athar Abbas, while responding to the report, told Daily Times that in fact the FC had proposed to open a training centre in collaboration with the US. He said sharing training expertise was routine for the US and Pakistan. He said there was no official word on the proposal yet. He said the ISPR would issue a detailed reply to the NY Times report on Monday (today). afp/staff report

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
i guss , no harm getting support to get trained for this genertion of S .OP .FORCES. pakistan has a very exellent force but yes, pakistans conventional ground forces need next genertion of training , its imedietly needed.

Always confuses me. If the the PA is really good as every one states here why should the US train the FC ?

Why can't they train the PA and then the PA can train the FC ?

Regards
 
Always confuses me. If the the PA is really good as every one states here why should the US train the FC ?

Why can't they train the PA and then the PA can train the FC ?

Regards

:) read between the lines dear.

BTW: I was thinking in the morning today If the FC men would be able to understand training in English ;)

Or the US trainer soldiers have to learn Pashto or Urdu before training them.
 
:) read between the lines dear.

BTW: I was thinking in the morning today If the FC men would be able to understand training in English ;)

Or the US trainer soldiers have to learn Pashto or Urdu before training them.

Is the MAC ' Donald' in FATA or NWFP ? If not there is no way the US trainers will survive ?

Regards
 
Always confuses me. If the the PA is really good as every one states here why should the US train the FC ?

Why can't they train the PA and then the PA can train the FC ?

Regards

i think thats how its going to be - train the trainers of PA and FC.
 
i think thats how its going to be - train the trainers of PA and FC.

Sir i think you are right beacuse looking at the number of these US trainer (22) one clearly can understand that they might be training few PA and FC trainers.

Bur sir there is another point that US army trainer will acompany the FC during operations. How you see it???

Is FC going to get benefit out of it?? of its otherway round. ? And what is the risk level for the Yanks in this case ???
 
Sir i think you are right beacuse looking at the number of these US trainer (22) one clearly can understand that they might be training few PA and FC trainers.

Bur sir there is another point that US army trainer will acompany the FC during operations. How you see it???

Is FC going to get benefit out of it?? of its otherway round. ? And what is the risk level for the Yanks in this case ???

Dear Jana - whats tought in the classroom has to be replicated at field level so u will c these guys evaluating the performance of the FC soldiers and i am sure the FC trainers (officers) will tag along.
 
Dear Jana - whats tought in the classroom has to be replicated at field level so u will c these guys evaluating the performance of the FC soldiers and i am sure the FC trainers (officers) will tag along.

The question is why do they need 100 men to actualy evaluate the performance of the FC? Isnt this odd. I dont know but i do have concerns over this. We dont really see 100 men actually coming for training purpose.:confused:
 
Dear Jana - whats tought in the classroom has to be replicated at field level so u will c these guys evaluating the performance of the FC soldiers and i am sure the FC trainers (officers) will tag along.

Sir i am talking about acompanying of US trainers during operations not that of FC trainers.
 
Sir i am talking about acompanying of US trainers during operations not that of FC trainers.

my Dear Jana - the field includes ops and both US and FC trainers will be there. whether they actually take part in the ops is a a good question? my guess is good as yours!
 
Back
Top Bottom