What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dude, except for the citizens of Turkey; Half a million people of Turkish origin live in Ukraine. And the homeland of most of them is the regions currently occupied by Russia. These people are Muslims, but they are not seen as Muslims in general in this forum because they are Turkish at the same time...
 
View attachment 818481
Another CB broadcast on CW band 14 @ 14130.44 kHz

You can tune in here:
1645783846328.png


27350.00 band 27 on LSB broadcasting some sort of looped message.
 
FMbzpJEWYAY1rMA


An artistic work from Kharkov. (Unexploded Russian missile)

Here, the author emphasizes the complexity of the postmodern world.

Joking aside, Russia is hitting certain areas without making any distinction there are civilians or not.
 
So at least you admit that Russia broke a promise.

As a sovereign state, Ukraine was fully within its rights to join any alliance but the problem for Ukraine was that NATO never considered Ukraine for membership in the first place. Whatever was insinuated was nothing more than chatter.

As for Cuba, what we did was a blockade. We could have invaded, killed all Soviet advisors, and took every missile on the island and there was nothing the Soviet Union could have done. Instead, we let the Soviets carted off the missiles and saved some face.

Wasn't it Cuba's right to whoever they wanted to host on their land. Why the blockade than? (It was much deeper but anyways quoting your own words)

Again if that blockade ( as you said) would not have worked you would have done the same things as mentioned.

The rationale is not different.

The excuse you would have made would be something like spreading democracy or anything else that sells. That doesn't change the actual reasoning or objectives.
 
Wasn't it Cuba's right to do whoever they want to host on their land. Why the blockade than? (It was much deeper but anyways quoting your own words)

Again if that blockade ( as you said) would not have worked you would have done the same things as mentioned.

The rationale is not different.

The excuse you would have made would be something like spreading democracy or anything else that sells. That doesn't change the actual reasoning or objectives.
You are correct about the rationale. No one wanted such threats to be so close to home soil.

But the problem for your argument is that NATO never considered Ukraine for membership from the time Russia made that WRITTEN promise not to violate Ukraine's sovereignty, and that Ukraine never hosted anyone. I am willing to predict that as time go by, it will be increasingly clear that Putin made up his rationale to break Russia's WRITTEN promise to Ukraine. Look at the social turmoil in Russia now.
 
Russian forces took 100% control of Konotop and Sumy Oblast. Confirmed.
 
You are correct about the rationale. No one wanted such threats to be so close to home soil.

But the problem for your argument is that NATO never considered Ukraine for membership from the time Russia made that WRITTEN promise not to violate Ukraine's sovereignty, and that Ukraine never hosted anyone. I am willing to predict that as time go by, it will be increasingly clear that Putin made up his rationale to break Russia's WRITTEN promise to Ukraine. Look at the social turmoil in Russia now.
Russian promised to not violate Ukraine sovereignty if Ukraine promised it wouldn't try to join NATO as part of the Minsk agreement. Ukraine reneged.
 
But what about most wars since ?



I am an anti-war and anti-military person but that is a wonderful sight.
LOL, if you are an anti war and anti military person, you won't be here, in PDF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom