USA agreed to discuss troops pull out from Afghanistan with Taliban at Doha.

[TMA]

Where is the body? Buried at sea so tomb destroying wahhabis don't suddenly change thier mind and build a tomb at his grave? Pull the other one.

Why did tower 7 fall?

A big whale swallowed the corpse....

You have issues about U.S. bombing Afghanistan but you do the same thing when the Taliban which as you said supports attacks Pakistan, especially when they targeted the civilians or military. Good Taliban and bad Taliban whichever you see.

Its a good analogy with pro Putin installed in Mexco City just like Putin invaded Ukraine just over possible pro western government. Just like you said, Russia would have serious problems digesting that.

Russia did not invade Crimea...unless you think it is still an invasion when the Crimeans wanted to become part of the Russian federation in response to the illegal Western supported coup in Kiev?

 

[Oldman1]

A big whale swallowed the corpse....


Russia did not invade Crimea...unless you think it is still an invasion when the Crimeans wanted to become part of the Russian federation in response to the illegal Western supported coup in Kiev?

If Russia did not invade Crimea why the need to send in the so called Green men in disguise?

Yes the most controvercial attacks in the history of world where attack on 2 buildings resulted in collapse of third building far away ...

The 3rd building WTC7 wasn't too far away enough from debris.

Those are the Mujahideen later to form Taliban.

The same Mujahideen which were glorified in Hollywood movies
and the same Mujahideen which were glorified by the Americans.

Which is also supported by Pakistan as well.

 

[zectech]

Why did tower 7 fall?

http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=5367.0

 

[The Accountant]

If Russia did not invade Crimea why the need to send in the so called Green men in disguise?



The 3rd building WTC7 wasn't too far away enough from debris.



Which is also supported by Pakistan as well.

Yes it was not far enough from the Debris but was not also close enough .. and are you suggesting that a building that was 110 meters away made of steel structure destroyed due to fire ...

Ok let's assume that somehow internal fire management system was crooked and fire could happen by smallest of the incident just like putting a cigarette in a garbage bin but even in that case, this is the only miracle on earth that a steel structure is destroyed due to fire and that too the whole tower simultaneously ...

Now if you know science then it is impossible that fire could damage all the columns equally so in case one critical column fails than demolition should have started from that specific side of the building and then it must have weaken the other coulmns... But by which principals of physics the whole building collapsed simultaneously without any resistance in a free fall manner?

 

[Oldman1]

Yes it was not far enough from the Debris but was not also close enough .. and are you suggesting that a building that was 110 meters away made of steel structure destroyed due to fire ...

Ok let's assume that somehow internal fire management system was crooked and fire could happen by smallest of the incident just like putting a cigarette in a garbage bin but even in that case, this is the only miracle on earth that a steel structure is destroyed due to fire and that too the whole tower simultaneously ...

Now if you know science then it is impossible that fire could damage all the columns equally so in case one critical column fails than demolition should have started from that specific side of the building and then it must have weaken the other coulmns... But by which principals of physics the whole building collapsed simultaneously without any resistance in a free fall manner?

The WTC builds are tall. The debris can reach it.

Yes it was not far enough from the Debris but was not also close enough .. and are you suggesting that a building that was 110 meters away made of steel structure destroyed due to fire ...

Ok let's assume that somehow internal fire management system was crooked and fire could happen by smallest of the incident just like putting a cigarette in a garbage bin but even in that case, this is the only miracle on earth that a steel structure is destroyed due to fire and that too the whole tower simultaneously ...

Now if you know science then it is impossible that fire could damage all the columns equally so in case one critical column fails than demolition should have started from that specific side of the building and then it must have weaken the other coulmns... But by which principals of physics the whole building collapsed simultaneously without any resistance in a free fall manner?

Didn't Iran just lost a skyscraper? No plane crash. No debris. Was on fire.

 

[LeGenD]

http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=5367.0

Much of the building had caught fire prior to collapse. After suffering extensive damage, authorities might have declared WTC-7 a public hazard and arguably facilitated its collapse.

Why this is an issue?

Now watch this:

In Iran.

 

[The Accountant]

The WTC builds are tall. The debris can reach it.

Didn't Iran just lost a skyscraper? No plane crash. No debris. Was on fire.

Dear Iranian Sky scarpper was not made of Steel Structure. I said WTC7 is the only steel structured sky scrapper destroyed due to fire as temperature of fire due to general items like wood and paper is much lower than melting temperature of steel which is 1500 degrees.

Furthermore, watch the video shared above by @LeGenD ... it clearly shows hiw a building destroyed by fire .. in a complete random manner .... it cant get destroyed simultaneously as it happens only in controlled demolition ...

@LeGenD brother there is no facilitation in demolition of wtc7 otherwise they would have claimed it ...

Wtc7 had the similar offices of cia and other government agencies working on cruicial investigations like enron ...

Anyways engineers are of the opinion that fire cannot destroy a steel structured sky scrapper and even if it could it cant be a control demolition in free fall methid ... that impossible ...

 

[khail007]

The Taliban protected Osama.

A blatant lie, in fact OBL was CIA operative who was trained and protected by CIA for US evil design/strategy in the region. OBL was in Sudan (pre 9/11 - which was staged by US herself). OBL was quietly allowed to travel to Afghanistan for 9/11 preparation and to attack Afghanistan, though OBL was wanted.
The fools just came to know after 17 years of beating that they have to negotiate with Talibans, what a sequence of wise office holders of US government.
another superpower's graveyard. What shall you sow, so shall you reap.

 

[Oldman1]

A blatant lie, in fact OBL was CIA operative who was trained and protected by CIA for US evil design/strategy in the region. OBL was in Sudan (pre 9/11 - which was staged by US herself). OBL was quietly allowed to travel to Afghanistan for 9/11 preparation and to attack Afghanistan, though OBL was wanted.
The fools just came to know after 17 years of beating that they have to negotiate with Talibans, what a sequence of wise office holders of US government.
another superpower's graveyard. What shall you sow, so shall you reap.

No it’s not a lie. The Taliban themselves admitted they protected him. Even to the point of killing the Taliban’s main enemy the leader of the Northern Alliance days prior to 9/11.

Dear Iranian Sky scarpper was not made of Steel Structure. I said WTC7 is the only steel structured sky scrapper destroyed due to fire as temperature of fire due to general items like wood and paper is much lower than melting temperature of steel which is 1500 degrees.

Furthermore, watch the video shared above by @LeGenD ... it clearly shows hiw a building destroyed by fire .. in a complete random manner .... it cant get destroyed simultaneously as it happens only in controlled demolition ...

@LeGenD brother there is no facilitation in demolition of wtc7 otherwise they would have claimed it ...

Wtc7 had the similar offices of cia and other government agencies working on cruicial investigations like enron ...

Anyways engineers are of the opinion that fire cannot destroy a steel structured sky scrapper and even if it could it cant be a control demolition in free fall methid ... that impossible ...

You should watch videos of debris damaging the WTC7 besides fire caught on after the collapse or the Twin Towers. Pretty much contributing to its collapse. Please enlighten me on the skyscraper of Iran’s building and what it’s made out of. Was it wood only?

 

[The Accountant]

No it’s not a lie. The Taliban themselves admitted they protected him. Even to the point of killing the Taliban’s main enemy the leader of the Northern Alliance days prior to 9/11.



You should watch videos of debris damaging the WTC7 besides fire caught on after the collapse or the Twin Towers. Pretty much contributing to its collapse. Please enlighten me on the skyscraper of Iran’s building and what it’s made out of. Was it wood only?

It was made of concrete ... concrete is way much heavier and failure in one part will result collapse of another part plus the building was too old ... structure must have been already too weak ...

The issue is not thw material but the way the tower is collapsing ... just watch the iranian building or any other building collapse other than controlled demolition ...

They never came down simultaneously ... it always step by step destruction as we are witnessing in case of iranian buliding ...

By the way taliban did offer to hand over Osama bin ladin to a neutral country who can hold trial under international law but us did not accepted the same ...

Taliban government put 3 conditions to us gov... 1 was to provide undeniable evidence of osama's involvement and then he can be handed over ... 2nd was to run a trial against osama in afghanistan ... 3rd was to handover osama to a neutral country such as saudia who can have trial of osama under international law ...

But none was acceptable by US ...

Demands of taliban gov were justified by every standard but us never wanted an open trial as they were afriad of being exposed ...

 

[Oldman1]

It was made of concrete ... concrete is way much heavier and failure in one part will result collapse of another part plus the building was too old ... structure must have been already too weak ...

The issue is not thw material but the way the tower is collapsing ... just watch the iranian building or any other building collapse other than controlled demolition ...

They never came down simultaneously ... it always step by step destruction as we are witnessing in case of iranian buliding ...

By the way taliban did offer to hand over Osama bin ladin to a neutral country who can hold trial under international law but us did not accepted the same ...

Taliban government put 3 conditions to us gov... 1 was to provide undeniable evidence of osama's involvement and then he can be handed over ... 2nd was to run a trial against osama in afghanistan ... 3rd was to handover osama to a neutral country such as saudia who can have trial of osama under international law ...

But none was acceptable by US ...

Demands of taliban gov were justified by every standard but us never wanted an open trial as they were afriad of being exposed ...

The way it collapsed. What factor does it contribute to the conspiracy?

Really? What would the CIA agent Osama protected by the Taliban was the U.S. afraid that be exposed? The Taliban could have just said they interrogated Osama and claimed he works for CIA and helped planned the invasion of Afghanistan.

 

[khail007]

Really? What would the CIA agent Osama protected by the Taliban was the U.S. afraid that be exposed?

Sir, you are not on firm grounds, lie spread fast but can't prevail.
Yes US was afraid of OBL or US government office holder use the event of OBL death as a springboard to get next term, the same show they did in Saddam's case.
Why US was tried to convince the world first by issuing photoshoped face of dead OBL and then to buried him sea? Then issued a sheer foolish excuse against proper burial of OBL.

 

[Oldman1]

Sir, you are not on firm grounds, lie spread fast but can't prevail.
Yes US was afraid of OBL or US government office holder use the event of OBL death as a springboard to get next term, the same show they did in Saddam's case.
Why US was tried to convince the world first by issuing photoshoped face of dead OBL and then to buried him sea? Then issued a sheer foolish excuse against proper burial of OBL.

The U.S. never released a photograph of his body. Nor made a photo shopped version. Now who's talking about spreading lies.

 

[Kaniska]

@Path-Finder

Al-jazeera is reporting this.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1051261329288425472

Good news...At least my tax money is not getting wasted in Afganistan...

 

[khail007]

The U.S. never released a photograph of his body. Nor made a photo shopped version. Now who's talking about spreading lies.

Sir, ask you media, not to me. I believe, those who could assassinate a dead person could do anything and could go to any extent.