What's new

T-84 oplot M fails testing what now for the army, in terms of tanks?

Status
Not open for further replies.
you touched the raw nerve, many people boast superiority and hiding its minus. This Question of yours will send even Tank maker into Tizzy and run under tablet.

Even T-90 Failed in hot trails and it has to modify to suit Indian hot condition needs by the Army engineers over the period of years. which later replicated in Arjun.
Still Arjun is a failure as for T-84 OPLOT M the only problem is in engine and if Ukraine manages to resolve the issue within next few months we will go for OPLOT M and we may go for engine from other country.
 
Still Arjun is a failure as for T-84 OPLOT M the only problem is in engine and if Ukraine manages to resolve the issue within next few months we will go for OPLOT M and we may go for engine from other country.
which account you called Arjun failed? If Arjun is failed then your AK also failed because you are forced to Other country tank , and out of 2500 units you only manage to satisfy only with 500 odd number.

Now you came up with unsual weight thing and parameter and role for other purpose , the same argument is also said for Arjun, as IA is added in the number and defined it role and allocated to its elite units.

A) AK and your other tanks carry same company engine, how come the same company and series engine failed on new tank and success in old tank?
 
which account you called Arjun failed? If Arjun is failed then your AK also failed because you are forced to Other country tank , and out of 2500 units you only manage to satisfy only with 500 odd number.

Now you came up with unsual weight thing and parameter and role for other purpose , the same argument is also said for Arjun, as IA is added in the number and defined it role and allocated to its elite units.

A) AK and your other tanks carry same company engine, how come the same company and series engine failed on new tank and success in old tank?
AK we have 500 of them and we are producing more as for OPLOT M that is to replace other Tanks and AK-2 is also about to come. We don't have bigger production rate due to budget. Arjun is a known failure in fact a total disaster. Your Army knows it very well.

which account you called Arjun failed? If Arjun is failed then your AK also failed because you are forced to Other country tank , and out of 2500 units you only manage to satisfy only with 500 odd number.

Now you came up with unsual weight thing and parameter and role for other purpose , the same argument is also said for Arjun, as IA is added in the number and defined it role and allocated to its elite units.

A) AK and your other tanks carry same company engine, how come the same company and series engine failed on new tank and success in old tank?
Because that is 1500 HP engine AK has 1200 HP engine. 1500 HP engine has come recently
 
What exactly is PA looking for when they tested T84 & MBT3000? why have have they both failed the test?
 
Any change of Leopard2 getting our way?

images
 
AK we have 500 of them and we are producing more as for OPLOT M that is to replace other Tanks and AK-2 is also about to come. We don't have bigger production rate due to budget. Arjun is a known failure in fact a total disaster. Your Army knows it very well.


Because that is 1500 HP engine AK has 1200 HP engine. 1500 HP engine has come recently
A) Isn't AK-2 left in favour of MBT-3000 , which was again failed ? It has 1300 HP engine

B) If you don't know OPLOT has 1200 / 1500 HP engine.

So here you theory of Engine do not hold.

AK -1 engine :- KMDB 6TD-2 6-cylinder Diesel 1,200 hp (890 kW)
MBT 3000 - 1,300
hp (969 kW)
OPLOT - KMDB 6TD-2E 6-cylinder diesel (1,200 hp) or
KMDB 6TD-3 6-cylinder diesel (1,500 hp)

Now either you choosing 1200 HP in OPLOT or 1500 HP ? OPLOT and AK has same engines I.e. AK-I and II

If you are choosing 1200 HP then what is using of AK-1 and if 1500HP what is the utility of AK-2? So you engine theory goes waste here , come with another story to make your AK -1 and AK-2 a scuess.




just for your Information , Both engine is liquid cooled ....and IF the engine failed then your AK series engine would also get failed.
 
A) Isn't AK-2 left in favour of MBT-3000 , which was again failed ? It has 1300 HP engine

B) If you don't know OPLOT has 1200 / 1500 HP engine.

So here you theory of Engine do not hold.

AK -1 engine :- KMDB 6TD-2 6-cylinder Diesel 1,200 hp (890 kW)
MBT 3000 - 1,300
hp (969 kW)
OPLOT - KMDB 6TD-2E 6-cylinder diesel (1,200 hp) or
KMDB 6TD-3 6-cylinder diesel (1,500 hp)

Now either you choosing 1200 HP in OPLOT or 1500 HP ? OPLOT and AK has same engines I.e. AK-I and II

If you are choosing 1200 HP then what is using of AK-1 and if 1500HP what is the utility of AK-2? So you engine theory goes waste here , come with another story to make your AK -1 and AK-2 a scuess.





just for your Information , Both engine is liquid cooled ....and IF the engine failed then your AK series engine would also get failed.
Oplot we are testing has 1500 HP engine and no AK-2 project is running, it wasn't stopped. Oplot M will be for replacing our old Tanks like T-59 and T-69 and T-85 and AL ZARRAR. Mr engine is one part only, engine isn't everything, so yes both OPLOT M and AK-2 will have 1500 HP engines but they would be really different in all other features . Their is no such thing as 1200/1500 what you have written is three year old info when 1500 HP was getting ready so now we tested OPLOT M with new 1500 HP and it is giving few problems. So we can test other Tanks also and we may with for Ukraine to sort out the problem with their new 1500 HP engine.
 
Sources suggest AK-2 is quite similar to Leopard both in shape as well as features
I never saw AK in tank comparison or top 10 tanks of the world's lists. ak is our star but it being quite similar to leopard is not known yet. If you have inside info, you may share that.
 
I never saw AK in tank comparison or top 10 tanks of the world's lists. ak is our star but it being quite similar to leopard is not known yet. If you have inside info, you may share that.
Yes AK-2 is pretty much new Tank and is being build by help of Turkey.
 
Yes AK-2 is pretty much new Tank and is being build by help of Turkey.
Since when is building and how much more time it will take? Any proto is build or only in paper ? lol

if AK-2 is building then why buying foreign tank? care to explain in what respect is superior or inferior your AK-1 with OPLOT.
 
Since when is building and how much more time it will take? Any proto is build or only in paper ? lol

if AK-2 is building then why buying foreign tank? care to explain in what respect is superior or inferior your AK-1 with OPLOT.
We always have 3 to 4 different Tanks. 2 prototypes of AK-2 are under trial since 2013
 
I think its engine was seized, most probably in desert trials where dust and temperature both go against engines. Our Alkhalid shines there and we need something that reliable yet more potent.
The Al-Khalid uses a Ukrainian diesel engine as well - so unless this particular engine was a variant or different engine entirely with issues that are deemed too significant to address with design modifications within whatever time-frame the PA wants, I would not rule out the Oplot on the basis of engine failure alone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom