Remove Farakka barrage', demands Nitish Kumar as flood situation in Bihar turns grim

[Nilgiri]

150 Bihari died in the flood. I can't remember This kind of death toll in Bangladesh during floods. I guess it's important to keep kolkata navigable than 150 lives in Bihar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood...tion_and_deaths_in_major_floods_.2C_1954-1998

http://www.dawn.com/news/729944/heavy-rains-landslides-kill-51-in-bangladesh

http://www.terradaily.com/2004/040723080940.jzjvlmr9.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3530532.stm

QUOTE:

Some 600 people have died in the flooding that has left at least 30m people homeless or stranded.

When have 30 million been made homeless and stranded in India in 21st century? Truly a low consumption, poverty stricken overpopulated, basket case LDC.

Will this one also increase this year?:

http://floodlist.com/asia/bangladesh-floods-july-august-2016

 

[Species]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood...tion_and_deaths_in_major_floods_.2C_1954-1998

http://www.dawn.com/news/729944/heavy-rains-landslides-kill-51-in-bangladesh

http://www.terradaily.com/2004/040723080940.jzjvlmr9.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3530532.stm

QUOTE:

Some 600 people have died in the flooding that has left at least 30m people homeless or stranded.

When have 30 million been made homeless and stranded in India in 21st century? Truly a low consumption, poverty stricken overpopulated, basket case LDC.

Will this one also increase this year?:

http://floodlist.com/asia/bangladesh-floods-july-august-2016

Dude do you know the meaning of Basket Case? If you know you would understand that India is the rightful holder of that title since despite being the largest recipient of US AID India is still one of the poorest countries in the world in terms of multidimensional poverty, has the worst sanitation facilities and one of the lowest living standard in the world.

 

[Nilgiri]

Dude do you know the meaning of Basket Case? If you know you would understand that India is the rightful holder that title since despite being the largest recipient of US AID India is still one of the poorest countries in the world in terms of multidimensional poverty, has the worst sanitation facilities and one of the lowest living standard in the world.

Tell me when someone called India a basket case? Bangladesh is known as the original basket case.

Whether it has stopped being one is matter of debate....it certainly continues to be a LDC....and if you thought submitting 0 - 2 patents to the USPTO was bad enough, its a 44 patent submission total within BD by your lot.

India figures in 1960 (as far back as the World Bank records it) for this was 721.

Is it something in your country that makes you lot unable to think beyond a certain level? Seems basket case worthy to me.

All Bangladesh IQ gets pooled into BBS probably to present a brave face and hope no one cares or notices the real truth of the basket case it is.

 

[Species]

Tell me when someone called India a basket case? Bangladesh is known as the original basket case.

Whether it has stopped being one is matter of debate....it certainly continues to be a LDC....and if you thought submitting 0 - 2 patents to the USPTO was bad enough, its a 44 patent submission total within BD by your lot.

India figures in 1960 (as far back as the World Bank records it) for this was 721.

Is it something in your country that makes you lot unable to think beyond a certain level? Seems basket case worthy to me.

All Bangladesh IQ gets pooled into BBS probably to present a brave face and hope no one cares or notices the real truth of the basket case it is.

Show me a report that calls Bangladesh a basket case. I can show tons of them which calls India world's largest toilet. It's funny you keep using a term which you don't know the meaning of.

You talk a lot about IQ, why don't you show some sources that shows the figures of IQ in Bangladesh and India?

 

[Nilgiri]

You talk a lot about IQ, why don't you show some sources that shows the figures IQ in Bangladesh and India?

Direct IQ measurement is difficult in developing countries, but certain parameters hint holding all else the same.

If we were truly equivalent, you would be around the same per capita output of scientific output, patents and such.

Instead you are a tiny fraction of a fraction of it (even per capita). You are small minded people. Your patent output within BD for example is showing NO consistent growth trend....its just all over the place among its tiny tiny base which is sad for a country of 170 million people:

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IP.PAT.RESD?locations=IN-BD

Where is the big increase that BD should be seeing now from economic growth? Reality: you are a basket case.

Whenever there is no BBS conduit thats possible (lie say sanitation, health etc), BD's terrible LDC nature comes out.

Someone really should throw BBS out and collect neutral unfudged data and show the mirror that you are probably right at the bottom still.

But no one cares enough to do so, hence we have this huge disparity between what can be fudged and what can't be.

It is BD model of development

 

[kobiraaz]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood...tion_and_deaths_in_major_floods_.2C_1954-1998

http://www.dawn.com/news/729944/heavy-rains-landslides-kill-51-in-bangladesh

http://www.terradaily.com/2004/040723080940.jzjvlmr9.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3530532.stm

QUOTE:

Some 600 people have died in the flooding that has left at least 30m people homeless or stranded.

When have 30 million been made homeless and stranded in India in 21st century? Truly a low consumption, poverty stricken overpopulated, basket case LDC.

Will this one also increase this year?:

http://floodlist.com/asia/bangladesh-floods-july-august-2016

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood...tion_and_deaths_in_major_floods_.2C_1954-1998

http://www.dawn.com/news/729944/heavy-rains-landslides-kill-51-in-bangladesh

http://www.terradaily.com/2004/040723080940.jzjvlmr9.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3530532.stm

QUOTE:

Some 600 people have died in the flooding that has left at least 30m people homeless or stranded.

When have 30 million been made homeless and stranded in India in 21st century? Truly a low consumption, poverty stricken overpopulated, basket case LDC.

Will this one also increase this year?:

http://floodlist.com/asia/bangladesh-floods-july-august-2016

While floods in Bangladesh are natural, In India is man made and reversible. truly Baniya. Earning at the expense of low caste Biharis

 

[Nilgiri]

While floods in Bangladesh are natural, In India is man made and reversible. truly Baniya. Earning at the expense of low caste Biharis

Uh huh...sorry it will only mean something coming from a country that can produce some high level scientific and patent output.

You are free to believe whatever you want in your little swamp well about what is "man made" and what isn't.

 

[Species]

Direct IQ measurement is difficult in developing countries, but certain parameters hint holding all else the same.

If we were truly equivalent, you would be around the same per capita output of scientific output, patents and such.

Instead you are a tiny fraction of a fraction of it (even per capita). You are small minded people. Your patent output within BD for example is showing NO consistent growth trend....its just all over the place among its tiny tiny base which is sad for a country of 170 million people:

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IP.PAT.RESD?locations=IN-BD

Where is the big increase that BD should be seeing now from economic growth? Reality: you are a basket case.

Whenever there is no BBS conduit thats possible (lie say sanitation, health etc), BD's terrible LDC nature comes out.

Someone really should throw BBS out and collect neutral unfudged data and show the mirror that you are probably right at the bottom still.

But no one cares enough to do so, hence we have this huge disparity between what can be fudged and what can't be.

It is BD model of development

See the irony, you are repeatedly talking about IQ but you keep on proving yourself as possessing a low IQ.

Patent filing is not proportional to the level of IQ of the people of a country. It is affected by many catalysts, like lack of opportunities, proper facilities, awareness etc.

Being a Basket Case and being an LDC are different things. Basket Case is a country which despite receiving substantial foreign aid, fails to achieve any significant development in terms of social indicators. India is the largest recipient of foreign aid in the world and yet it remains one of the poorest countries in the world in terms of multidimensional poverty, has the worst sanitation facilities and one of the lowest living standard in the world. Hence, India is a basket case.

Now let's compare the statistical capacity of Bangladesh and India. For 2015, World Bank puts Bangladesh's figure at 76.7 and India's at 77.8. So there is not much difference between the statistical capacities of Bangladesh and India. If you really think BBS data is unreliable then you also have to abandon the data from Indian statistical agencies.

People may find this article interesting, since we are talking about basket cases.
India: A basket case in the making?

 

[Nilgiri]

See the irony, you are repeatedly talking about IQ but you keep on proving yourself as possessing a low IQ.

Patent filing is not proportional to the level of IQ of the people of a country. It is affected by many catalysts, like lack of opportunities, proper facilities, awareness etc.

Being a Basket Case and being an LDC are different things. Basket Case is a country which despite receiving substantial foreign aid, fails to achieve any significant development in terms of social indicators. India is the largest recipient of foreign aid in the world and yet it remains one of the poorest countries in the world in terms of multidimensional poverty, has the worst sanitation facilities and one of the lowest living standard in the world. Hence, India is a basket case.

Now let's compare the statistical capacity of Bangladesh and India. For 2015, World Bank puts Bangladesh's figure at 76.7 and India's at 77.8. So there is not much difference between the statistical capacities of Bangladesh and India. If you really think BBS data is unreliable then you also have to abandon the data from Indian statistical agencies.

a) Problem is that most of the data out there for BD comes from years when its statistical capacity was rated significantly lower (mid 60s)

b) It is only a measure of the framework/ periodicity/volumes rather than underlying quality of base-data (hence why it fluctuates quite a lot from year to year sometimes).

c) All indices have their weaknesses by the very nature of subjectively assigning weights and component choice.

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/...atistical_Capacity_Indicator_BBSC_Nov2012.pdf

People may find this article interesting, since we are talking about basket cases.

Haha butthurt leftist trash Pavan K Varma. Good to know...it means he is getting thrashed soundly.

 

[Species]

a) Problem is that most of the data out there for BD comes from years when its statistical capacity was rated significantly lower (mid 60s)

b) It is only a measure of the framework/ periodicity/volumes rather than underlying quality of base-data.

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/...atistical_Capacity_Indicator_BBSC_Nov2012.pdf

See again you are proving yourself to be a fool.

BBS data are based on national censuses which carried out time to time. Statistical capacities for Bangladesh and India have been more or less same throughout the last few decades.

Haha butthurt leftist trash Pavan K Varma. Good to know...it means he is getting thrashed soundly.

Sure anyone proving you wrong will be a butthurt leftist trash. I'm sure you're now going to show articles of criticisms against this person because of his political affiliations but he looks credible to me.

 

[Nilgiri]

See again you are proving yourself to be a fool.

BBS data are based on national censuses which carried out time to time. Statistical capacities for Bangladesh and India have been more or less same throughout the last few decades.

Like I said its not an indicator of underlying data quality....and India has been notably higher many years in the past anyway:

I mean are you going to tell me that BD underlying data quality is better than China's?:

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IQ.SCI.OVRL?locations=IN-CN-BD

Sure anyone proving you wrong will be a butthurt leftist trash. I'm sure you're now going to show articles of criticisms against this person because of his political affiliations but he looks credible to me.

Why would I waste time doing that? I have heard him on full rant mode on TV and know exactly what and who he is. Its better to post something from an actual economist and not some flim flam politician.

 

[Species]

Like I said its not an indicator of underlying data quality....and India has been notably higher many years in the past anyway:

I mean are you going to tell me that BD underlying data quality is better than China's?:

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IQ.SCI.OVRL?locations=IN-CN-BD

The fact is quality of data is more or less same for Bangladesh and India, you can't disregard one data and accept another one.

World Bank is an institution managed by Western countries which are usually hostile towards China, they have always accused China of showing false data so the low statistical capacity figure.

Why would I waste time doing that? I have heard him on full rant mode on TV and know exactly what and who he is. Its better to post something from an actual economist and not some flim flam politician.

Thanks for not doing that, the article by the person looks well researched and informative, I would consider that credible.

 

[Nilgiri]

The fact is quality of data is more or less same for Bangladesh and India, you can't disregard one data and accept another one.

World Bank is an institution managed by Western countries which are usually hostile towards China, they have always accused China of showing false data so the low statistical capacity figure.

OK so now its a conspiracy/hostility against China. Gotcha.

Did you even read what they have published as to how this index is determined?

IT HAS HARDLY ANYTHING TO DO WITH UNDERLYING DATA QUALITY

If it did, why has the WHO rejected BD data on child malnutrition as requiring "re-analysis"?...putting it in a group of mostly subsaharan african countries?

Thanks for not doing that, the article by the person looks well researched and informative, I would consider that credible.

Sure you can believe that. It doesn't take much to convince people from a country that can only manage to submit 44 patents at their own PTO when they have 170 million people.

I guess politician automatically meaning intelligence is a prevalent view in BD.....and rhetoric = indisputable fact.

 

[Species]

OK so now its a conspiracy/hostility against China. Gotcha.

Did you even read what they have published as to how this index is determined?

IT HAS HARDLY ANYTHING TO DO WITH UNDERLYING DATA QUALITY

"The first dimension, statistical methodology, measures a country’s ability to adhere to
internationally recommended standards and methods. This aspect is captured by assessing
guidelines and procedures used to compile macroeconomic statistics, and social data reporting
and estimation practices." - Quoted from the link. Since the international organizations thought the data are good enough to record in their database, there's no reason to disregard them. Otherwise they would have simply displayed NA as they do for several countries. Point is clear, you are free to disregard the data of Bangladesh but you also have to disregard the Indian data as well.

Sure you can believe that. It doesn't take much to convince people from a country that can only manage to submit 44 patents at their own PTO when they have 170 million people.

I guess politician automatically meaning intelligence is a prevalent view in BD.

That's a typical cheap way to win an argument by a low IQ subhuman. Or what should I say, it takes lots of effort to convince people from a country that don't even know how to use a toilet?

You won't accept the article simply because it doesn't support your argument, case closed.

 

[AUz]

Why are indians so mad at Bangladeshis?

Is it due to the fact that Bangladesh was 'cleansed' of hindus quite effectively and poor indians couldn't do anything

Well, indian controlled Kashmir was cleansed of hindus by ISI and their networks and indians could barely do anything in their own territory

No need to be mad...

Just take it.

Muslims have been "shafting" a big wide rode in indians' hindus' arses--and they'll continue to do so. Just live with it.

Funny yet sad but funny this is that Gujrat riots still get more attention and coverage than mass destruction of hinduism from vast territories in Bengal, Pakistan, and Kashmir region etc...