What's new

Public outburst against paid & corrupt Indian Media: NDTV

vinod dua live on ndtv is the best and zee news

Vinod Dua is good for light hearted issues. When it comes to serious issues like corruption, he prefers to delve in gimmicks like poetry to get his point across. His stories are not at all thorough.

Zee news? The less said, the better.
 
Every time a politician opens his mouth against Hazare, he gets a few-hundred new followers, thousands of Facebook pages get updated and millions show their support for the man who has become a symbol of the fight against corruption.
 
The best news channel is Undoubtabely TIMES NOW. its the most unbiased, mature, sincere, and sharp news channel.

And arnab goswami is a "MONK AMONG MUGHALS IN MEDIA."
 
The Pioneer :: Home : >> UPA welcomes BJP support on bill

Mukherjee welcomed Advani's statement expressing support for the bill: "I welcome his support. I have kept him informed. His party has to support the bill in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha by pressing the button in its favour when it will be put to vote, only after which it will be passed."
 
As far as her being in contact with Nira Radia, that would be her job. She isn't being paid mega bucks to find out about the news after it appears in the next day's papers. The case against her is qualitatively different than that against Vir Sanghvi (liked him actually) who was guilty of doctoring his column according to instructions something that is only done for a large enough pay off. There is no indications that Barkha Dutt received any monitory consideration except maybe more internal gossip which btw is the life blood of a journalist.
Journalists do act as conduits between protagonists, often at the risk of their own credibility, and sometimes, even personal safety. Recently, Karan Thapar came out of the closet - not that one - revealing his role in the telephone fiasco during 26/11.

NOW that WikiLeaks has confirmed the broad details of a mystifying but intriguing story from 26/11, I feel free to add my own contribution to the tale.

I’m talking of the hoax call made to the president of Pakistan, Asif Zardari, allegedly by the then foreign minister, Pranab Mukherjee, at the height of the terror attack. Mr Mukherjee, it is claimed, threatened an immediate military response. In response, the Pakistani Air Force scrambled its fighter jets and went on high alert.

Here’s my role in this strange saga. 26/11 finally ended in the early hours of Saturday Nov 29, 2008. Just past noon I interviewed President Zardari by satellite. Around 3pm he called to find out if the interview was okay. At the end of that conversation he suddenly said: “By the way the next time you meet your foreign minister please advise him not to ring and threaten people.”

I was stumped. What on earth was Asif talking about? In a guarded manner he told me the story from his viewpoint. A caller claiming to be Pranab Mukherjee had rung late at night a day or so ago and effectively threatened war. The Pakistanis informed the Americans who, if my memory is correct, said Condoleezza Rice had also received a similar call although, in her case, it had not been put through.

Although Asif had told me to pass on the message when I next ‘bumped into’ Mr Mukherjee, I decided to do so at once. Mr Mukherjee heard me in rapt silence. He did not reveal that the story I was recounting had kept him up all night, if not for the last two nights. All he said was: “But I haven’t spoken to the president of Pakistan. How could I have called him? It’s not proper for a foreign minister to directly ring a head of state.”

Twenty-four hours later, on the afternoon of Sunday the 30th, I got a call from Satyabarata Pal, our high commissioner in Islamabad. “Karan, this is about your conversation with the FM yesterday.” When I pretended I had no idea what he was talking about, Shotto laughed loudly. “That’s ok. I know all about it. But I need you to do something.”

Shotto told me the Pakistanis were convinced the caller was Pranab Mukherjee and unwilling to accept it was not. He described the frenzied reaction in Islamabad on the night it happened and confirmed that the Americans had been roped in and that Condy Rice had also been phoned.

“I want you to ring your friend and personally assure him that it wasn’t Mr Mukherjee. Tell him what the FM told you. We need to bring this story to a quick end.”

A few hours later, when I rang Asif he chuckled as I spoke. “No, Karan, it wasn’t a hoax. We’ve noted the number from where the call originated. It’s said to be in your foreign ministry. But leave all that aside. It’s a closed chapter. Tell them to forget about it.”

Shotto was relieved to hear the final outcome. He said the fact the Pakistanis claimed to have an MEA number on record could be explained in a number of ways, all to do with telecom technology. “Now you must ring the FM and tell him.”

I got through to Mr Mukherjee late at night on Monday the 1st or perhaps it was the 2nd of December. I can’t be certain. When I finished speaking he replied in a voice free from tension and I could sense he was smiling. “Thank you Karan. For once you’ve been very useful!” The phone call ended with the FM enjoying his own joke. At the time I asked Mr Mukherjee to keep my ‘role’ under wraps and he agreed. So too did Shotto and Asif. But now that WikiLeaks has sprung the story I feel I can also spill the beans.

via DAWN
Shall we call Karan a pimp now. Barkha is a victim of a series of some very unfortunate incidents and as you have correctly pointed out, she has herself added fuel to the fire. Sure, she deserves admonishment. But seriously, sloganeering in the middle of the street? Give me a effing break.
 
Back
Top Bottom