What's new

NO sanctions Please join

iranigirl2

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
2,470
Reaction score
1
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
United States
"No Sanctions" Campaign's mission is to oppose international sanctions against Iran by informing people of the world about unjustified consequences of sanctions on Iranian people.


کمپین "نه به تحریم" با هدف تلاش جهت رفع تحریم های بین المللی علیه ایران تشکیل شده است.‬



https://www.facebook.com/NOsntn?notif_t=fbpage_fan_invite





Please Like And Share With Your Friends
 
rlly? I don't think this effect American policy against iran:what:
 
I didn't think patriotic Iranians were allowed to patronize infidel social media like Facebook.
 
House passes Iran sanctions bill to slash oil exports

7:56pm EDT

By Timothy Gardner, WASHINGTON | Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:14pm EDT

(Reuters) - The House of Representatives easily passed a bill on Wednesday to tighten sanctions on Iran, showing a strong message to Tehran over its disputed nuclear program days before President-elect Hassan Rouhani is sworn in.

The vote also highlighted a growing divide between Congress and the Obama administration on Iran policy ahead of international talks on the nuclear program in coming months. Iran insists the nuclear program is purely for civilian purposes.

The bill, which passed 400 to 20, would cut Iran's oil exports by another 1 million barrels per day over a year, in an attempt to reduce the flow of funds to the nuclear program. It is the first sanctions bill to put a number on exactly how much Iran's oil exports would be cut.

Previous U.S. and EU sanctions have reduced Iran's oil exports by more than half. The United States has worked with Iran's top oil consumers including China, Japan and South Korea to push them toward alternative suppliers of crude.

Oil prices have remained relatively steady, which has allowed the efforts to continue, but some analysts say further sanctions risk pushing up prices and damaging the economies of U.S. allies.

The bill still has to be passed in the Senate and signed by President Barack Obama before becoming law. The Senate Banking Committee is expected to introduce a similar measure in September, though it is uncertain whether the language to cut exports by 1 million barrels a day will survive.

Critics of the bill said it shows an aggressive signal to Iran that last month voted in Rouhani, a cleric many see as more moderate. He will be sworn in on Sunday.

NO HIGHER PRIORITY

Rep. Ed Royce, a California Republican and Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee who introduced the bill with Rep. Eliot Engel, a New York Democrat, said the United States has no higher national security priority than preventing a nuclear-armed Iran.

Royce said the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's drive to develop a nuclear arsenal was evident. "New president or not, I am convinced that Iran's Supreme Leader intends to continue on this path," he said.

The vote showed a growing disagreement between the White House and Congress on Iran policy. A senior administration official said on Wednesday the White House is not opposed to new sanctions in principle, but wants to give Rouhani a chance.

The Treasury Department last week partially eased sanctions on Iran by expanding a list of medical devices that can be exported there without special permission.

One of the 20 lawmakers to vote against the bill, Jim McDermott, a Washington-state Democrat, said shortly before the vote that the rush to sanction Iran before Rouhani takes office could hurt efforts to deflate the nuclear issue.

"It's a dangerous sign to send and it limits our ability to find a diplomatic solution to nuclear arms in Iran," McDermott said.

A supporter of harsher sanctions disagreed. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "doesn't see our flexibility and good faith efforts as a sign of good intentions, he sees it as a sign of weakness," said Mark Dubowitz, the head of Foundation of Defense of Democracies, an advocate of sanctions. "If anything, it's only going to be massively intensified sanctions that get him to blink."

But Trita Parsi, the president of the National Iranian American council, said the House action undermines the U.S. strategy which has long been one of good cop - bad cop. The White House has long taken a softer stance toward Iran's nuclear program, and Congress has taken a tougher one. But now there are signs that the good cop cannot control the bad cop, he said.

"The impression on the Iranian side is not that its good cop bad cop, but complete chaos and mayhem," Parsi said.

The bill also further denies Iran governments access to foreign currency reserves, and targets Iranian efforts to circumvent international sanctions against its shipping business.

House passes Iran sanctions bill to slash oil exports | Reuters

Facebook was started by Iranians in 2004

From Wiki:

Facebook is an online social networking service, whose name stems from the colloquial name for the book given to students at the start of the academic year by some university administrations in the United States to help students get to know each other.

It was founded in February 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with his college roommates and fellow Harvard University students Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes. The website's membership was initially limited by the founders to Harvard students, but was expanded to other colleges in the Boston area, the Ivy League, and Stanford University. It gradually added support for students at various other universities before opening to high school students, and eventually to anyone aged 13 and over.
 
A Blacklist Delays Book on Iran







Last month, Fabrica, a think tank in Treviso, Italy, run by the fashion company Benetton, released a book that offered a rare view of the domestic lives of Iranians. Overseen by Enrico Bossan, Fabrica’s head of photography, “Iranian Living Room” (about $45) presents images by photojournalists in Tehran and other cities of people in residential settings occupied with chores, socializing, leisure and prayer. But when Fabrica tried to sell “Iranian Living Room” on its Web site, with transactions processed through PayPal, the orders were initially blocked.


Dan Hill, the 43-year-old chief executive of Fabrica, said that persistent calls to PayPal’s customer service center and a barrage of complaints on social media ultimately yielded the reason: the word “Iranian” in the book’s title was on a blacklist (the term was PayPal’s, Mr. Hill said), a result of United States trade sanctions with Iran.

Contacted on Tuesday, Anuj Nayar, senior director of global initiatives at PayPal, told a reporter that the incident resulted from misguided efforts to follow regulations enforced by the Treasury Department. “Somebody made a mistake and it should never have happened,” he said. “We weren’t trying to be disingenuous. We weren’t trying to hide anything.” Mr. Nayar added: “We’ve tightened our processes to ensure no one else is caught in the same situation.”

Mr. Hill, who is British, received an apology from PayPal and an acknowledgment of an error, but recently told a reporter that he was still uneasy about the episode.

Q. What is the story behind “Iranian Living Room”?

A. The book comes from a tradition of social journalism that we’ve been doing at Fabrica for almost 15 years, and especially from an interest in cultural diversity. We were using photography in a quiet, everyday, humble way, just getting people to depict daily life in Tehran and other cities. It shows that behind closed doors, people in Iran also fall asleep in front of the TV. They also make food as individuals and in big family units. People there dress differently in the streets than they do in their homes. I think people do that in the West, too, but we don’t think of it in the same way.

In public comments, you said you wanted to give the West, which is steeped in reporting from CNN and the BBC, a different view of Iran, especially in light of the recent elections there. So you pulled our attention away from the street.

And, of course, real discussions take place behind closed doors in these interiorized private spaces. We had the idea that just by showing the way people live in the natural world, we might in some basic, humane way be able to make connections between places and cultures.

Why did you self-publish?

We found that the economics of the photo-book publishing industry just don’t really work much in your favor. And also the mechanics of getting things into bookstores is incredibly difficult. It was an opportunity to have our own Fabrica press. We designed the book ourselves and opened an online shop. That’s when that side of the story came in.

You found that PayPal was refusing to fulfill orders.

Yeah, exactly. It took us a good day or so to get information from PayPal that the title was the issue. I put through the transaction on a Sunday to test it with my own PayPal account. You got this generic error message. It didn’t say what the problem was. We had to chase them quite a lot, and then it turned out there was this thing: the blacklist, as it were. That’s how they described it. It’s still very difficult to find out from them much more detail than that.

So there’s no published list of words that PayPal finds offensive?

I don’t know what’s on the blacklist and what’s been previously banned. I don’t even mind that there were regulations based on international law. Regulations exist and embargoes exist. I’m a grown-up about this. For me, in a way, the issue is — leaving aside taking a while to get an answer and that in all probability I had to make a big deal on social media to get a real answer — it’s that there’s a laziness in coding if the word “Iranian” equals “no sale.” It’s like the most banal line of code you could write. I don’t think it was PayPal’s intention. They say it’s a mistake, but it’s a big mistake. Because their code is so embedded in our daily life, we can’t be careless about it.

How many books have sold?

Probably 100, but we only printed 500. It’s a small thing, as I said, a humble project. We’re doing an exhibition as well. I’m glad the work is out there this week, even if it took PayPal’s lazy coding to bring it to attention.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/01/garden/a-blacklist-delays-book-on-iran.html
 
I didn't think patriotic Iranians were allowed to patronize infidel social media like Facebook.



It is sad that we Americans know so little about Iranian CULTURE.

2500 years ago when Persian Civilization rivaled the Greek and Roman Civilization , some of our American Ancesters were living in Caves.

Iranian people are Proud and fiercely Independent People and no Theocracy can dampen their spirits. To view Iranians through the prism of Theocratic Mullahs is a blatant misjudgement of who these people rally are.
 
House passes Iran sanctions bill to slash oil exports

7:56pm EDT

By Timothy Gardner, WASHINGTON | Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:14pm EDT

(Reuters) - The House of Representatives easily passed a bill on Wednesday to tighten sanctions on Iran, showing a strong message to Tehran over its disputed nuclear program days before President-elect Hassan Rouhani is sworn in.

The vote also highlighted a growing divide between Congress and the Obama administration on Iran policy ahead of international talks on the nuclear program in coming months. Iran insists the nuclear program is purely for civilian purposes.

The bill, which passed 400 to 20, would cut Iran's oil exports by another 1 million barrels per day over a year, in an attempt to reduce the flow of funds to the nuclear program. It is the first sanctions bill to put a number on exactly how much Iran's oil exports would be cut.

Previous U.S. and EU sanctions have reduced Iran's oil exports by more than half. The United States has worked with Iran's top oil consumers including China, Japan and South Korea to push them toward alternative suppliers of crude.

Oil prices have remained relatively steady, which has allowed the efforts to continue, but some analysts say further sanctions risk pushing up prices and damaging the economies of U.S. allies.

The bill still has to be passed in the Senate and signed by President Barack Obama before becoming law. The Senate Banking Committee is expected to introduce a similar measure in September, though it is uncertain whether the language to cut exports by 1 million barrels a day will survive.

Critics of the bill said it shows an aggressive signal to Iran that last month voted in Rouhani, a cleric many see as more moderate. He will be sworn in on Sunday.

NO HIGHER PRIORITY

Rep. Ed Royce, a California Republican and Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee who introduced the bill with Rep. Eliot Engel, a New York Democrat, said the United States has no higher national security priority than preventing a nuclear-armed Iran.

Royce said the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's drive to develop a nuclear arsenal was evident. "New president or not, I am convinced that Iran's Supreme Leader intends to continue on this path," he said.

The vote showed a growing disagreement between the White House and Congress on Iran policy. A senior administration official said on Wednesday the White House is not opposed to new sanctions in principle, but wants to give Rouhani a chance.

The Treasury Department last week partially eased sanctions on Iran by expanding a list of medical devices that can be exported there without special permission.

One of the 20 lawmakers to vote against the bill, Jim McDermott, a Washington-state Democrat, said shortly before the vote that the rush to sanction Iran before Rouhani takes office could hurt efforts to deflate the nuclear issue.

"It's a dangerous sign to send and it limits our ability to find a diplomatic solution to nuclear arms in Iran," McDermott said.

A supporter of harsher sanctions disagreed. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "doesn't see our flexibility and good faith efforts as a sign of good intentions, he sees it as a sign of weakness," said Mark Dubowitz, the head of Foundation of Defense of Democracies, an advocate of sanctions. "If anything, it's only going to be massively intensified sanctions that get him to blink."

But Trita Parsi, the president of the National Iranian American council, said the House action undermines the U.S. strategy which has long been one of good cop - bad cop. The White House has long taken a softer stance toward Iran's nuclear program, and Congress has taken a tougher one. But now there are signs that the good cop cannot control the bad cop, he said.

"The impression on the Iranian side is not that its good cop bad cop, but complete chaos and mayhem," Parsi said.

The bill also further denies Iran governments access to foreign currency reserves, and targets Iranian efforts to circumvent international sanctions against its shipping business.

House passes Iran sanctions bill to slash oil exports | Reuters



From Wiki:

Facebook is an online social networking service, whose name stems from the colloquial name for the book given to students at the start of the academic year by some university administrations in the United States to help students get to know each other.

It was founded in February 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with his college roommates and fellow Harvard University students Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes. The website's membership was initially limited by the founders to Harvard students, but was expanded to other colleges in the Boston area, the Ivy League, and Stanford University. It gradually added support for students at various other universities before opening to high school students, and eventually to anyone aged 13 and over.

It's called American Jewish Lobby, not congress. It's bent down to Israel to let her do whatever it pleases.
 
It's called American Jewish Lobby, not congress. It's bent down to Israel to let her do whatever it pleases.

Oh Please! Stop this nonsense. Jewish conspiracies are really annoying now.
 
Oh Please! Stop this nonsense. Jewish conspiracies are really annoying now.

At the end of the day, the West and Israel take the mullahs seriously. With such sanctions as these, they wanted to cripple the Iranian economy..
 
Thinking that Jewish lobby doesn't have a strong influence in U.S policies towards Iran is as stupid as it sounds.You may not like it, but it's true.

Indeed there's a strong a influence since Israel is an ally of US but that doesn't mean you can call it "Jewish lobby".

At the end of the day, the West and Israel take the mullahs seriously. With such sanctions as these, they wanted to cripple the Iranian economy..

Instead of acting like a superpower, Iran should accept the reality and step back from this mentality.
 

Back
Top Bottom