What's new

Is Pakistan the heir to the Mughals?

Is Pakistan the heir to the Mughals?


  • Total voters
    92
Status
Not open for further replies.
Explain how it works if you will
Uday you have not improved at all from the last time we chatted. This is very disappointing. I will help you out. This is an excellent book to start with, you will never see the world the same again. Its available on the kindle store too, so easy to get. Let me know once you have read it.

Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind​

 
Uday you have not improved at all from the last time we chatted. This is very disappointing. I will help you out. This is an excellent book to start with, you will never see the world the same again. Its available on the kindle store too, so easy to get. Let me know once you have read it.

Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind​

Hey hey chill man, it's cool either way, we can't change our history in anycase, better look to the future:D

Ps - Sapiens has been in my bucket list for way too long :lol: maybe it's time
 
This may come as a shock to you but Alexander never set foot in India. He turned back as he approached the territory today known as India.

Saying Alexander conquered or fought Indians is like saying German Afrika Korps fought South Africa just because that country has the name 'Africa'.

Or Romanians claming they are Romans because of the name. Have a look at this map which details Alexander's movements in the region.

View attachment 816502

Detailed map of Pakistan with route of Alexanders march. Porus fought Alexander at Jhelum. I am pretty sure we will have PDF members from that district in Pakistan.

View attachment 816503

A more scoped map of Jhelum district in Pakistan where Alexander fought Porus. Clearly he was not a Gangu but a man from the Indus region.

View attachment 816505

I did a threa on this few years back.

Pakistan anyway. It was considered India back then,wasn't it? Just like before the partition.
 
I have recently been watching documentaries about the history of the Mughal Empire in the subcontinent.

I was wondering if Pakistanis today consider their country to be an heir to the Mughal Empire?

Obviously I think between Pakistan and India, Pakistan is culturally the more legitimate heir to the Mughal Empire even though most of the great monuments of the Mughals are in and around Northern India from Delhi to Agra. However, under the BJP led India, I believe Hindutva is actively seeking to shred links and traces of the Mughal past. The Mughals came from around modern day Uzbekistan and Afghanistan, and controlled the territory of Pakistan for most of their reign. They fused Turkic/Persian with local South Asian cultures and are Muslim, so obviously Pakistan can be considered the most accurate modern heir of the Mughal legacy.

Agree or disagree?


Pakistan is the successor state and rulers of all Empires that ruled South Asia which include

  1. Aryan Invasion (1500 - 300 BC)
  2. Maurya Empire (322 to 185 BC)
  3. Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC - 10 AD)
  4. Kushan Empire (30-375 AD)
  5. Gupta Empire (320 to 550 AD)
  6. Sindh Empire (550 -700 AD)
  7. Umayyad Al Hind Empire (700-1000 AD)
  8. Ghaznavid Empire (1000 - 1175 AD)
  9. Ghurid Empire (1175 - 1206 AD)
  10. Mamluk Empire (1206–1290 AD)
  11. Khilji Empire (1290-1320 AD)
  12. Tughlaq Empire (1320-1414 AD)
  13. Sayyid Empire (1414–1451 AD)
  14. Lodi dynasty (1451–1526 AD)
  15. The Mughal Empire (1526 - 1857 AD)
  16. British Empire (1858 and 1947 AD)
 
Pakistan is the successor state and rulers of all Empires that ruled South Asia which include

  1. Aryan Invasion (1500 - 300 BC)
  2. Maurya Empire (322 to 185 BC)
  3. Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC - 10 AD)
  4. Kushan Empire (30-375 AD)
  5. Gupta Empire (320 to 550 AD)
  6. Sindh Empire (550 -700 AD)
  7. Umayyad Al Hind Empire (700-1000 AD)
  8. Ghaznavid Empire (1000 - 1175 AD)
  9. Ghurid Empire (1175 - 1206 AD)
  10. Mamluk Empire (1206–1290 AD)
  11. Khilji Empire (1290-1320 AD)
  12. Tughlaq Empire (1320-1414 AD)
  13. Sayyid Empire (1414–1451 AD)
  14. Lodi dynasty (1451–1526 AD)
  15. The Mughal Empire (1526 - 1857 AD)
  16. British Empire (1858 and 1947 AD)
The word successor is used to describe an entity that succeeds its predecessor. By your logic, the #16 on your list, The British Empire, would be the successor state of all previous ones...
 
The word successor is used to describe an entity that succeeds its predecessor. By your logic, the #16 on your list, The British Empire, would be the successor state of all previous ones...

Yes but British ruled India through Indian Nawabs, Nizams and Indian Muslim league.
 
Pakistan is the successor state and rulers of all Empires that ruled South Asia which include

  1. Aryan Invasion (1500 - 300 BC)
  2. Maurya Empire (322 to 185 BC)
  3. Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC - 10 AD)
  4. Kushan Empire (30-375 AD)
  5. Gupta Empire (320 to 550 AD)
  6. Sindh Empire (550 -700 AD)
  7. Umayyad Al Hind Empire (700-1000 AD)
  8. Ghaznavid Empire (1000 - 1175 AD)
  9. Ghurid Empire (1175 - 1206 AD)
  10. Mamluk Empire (1206–1290 AD)
  11. Khilji Empire (1290-1320 AD)
  12. Tughlaq Empire (1320-1414 AD)
  13. Sayyid Empire (1414–1451 AD)
  14. Lodi dynasty (1451–1526 AD)
  15. The Mughal Empire (1526 - 1857 AD)
  16. British Empire (1858 and 1947 AD)


Not really,,. All Muslims of the sub continent have a right to the Muslim history of the sub continent

It's what forged our identity today

Any other pre Islamic history, for the people of Pakistan is only important if it happened within our land

We don't care what happened to the people east of us, they are not our people
 
Aaj Bakra nahi mila taskeen hasil kernay k lyay? Ya dog se kam chala liya

I thought you were in jail?

6127387d4796c.png



Taskeen nu chad, mobile kithon hasil kar lya?
 
Pakistan anyway. It was considered India back then,wasn't it? Just like before the partition.
That is like saying Greece was part of Germany before the collapse of the Third Reich. Just to correct you we were part of British Raj which was dissolved in 1947.

Just like Third Reich was a imposition on various countries of Europe and North Africa, British Raj was also a imposition on various peoples in South Asia.

It emphatically was NOT India as in the meaning it holds today. This infographic should lay bare the actuall situation.

This is British Raj with British flag ruled by London.


1645209399201.png



These are the successor states of the Raj. From east Myanmar [Burma], Bangladesh, Indian Union and Pakistan.

1645209452164.png


or in another way.

1645209479956.png
 
Afghanistan can claim that. Pakistan is just a western wing of gangadesh I would say except pukhtuns and balochis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom