What's new

India Wants to Send Wheat to Ease Afghan Hunger Crisis. Pakistan Has Yet to OK Transit.

Good, that's why y'all should have sat in your corner from the very beginning

You started this whole fake campaign of aid without proper procedure for doing so
Talibunnies are already asking you to allow this transit and Pakistanies are reluctant. :pop:Half of Afghan trade went to India before Talibs. Interesting times ahead, and you blocking trade between India and Central Asia has an inconsequential impact on us. It's barely $2 billions worth of two way trade.
 
well india should transport the aid food to delhi where millions are starving.
 
The title is changed to feel good...

Taliban is asking for help and India is ready to provide... Now in the situation, Pakistan government in the middle and nowhere...

If they will allow then will face criticism internally and if not, than Taliban will not be happy..

Win win situation for India... :enjoy:

Why will Pakistan face criticism internally or externally? Aid is for Afghanistan, not for Pakistan. 2nd, On war like situations like flood, earth quake, no country will reject aid, even from enemy country? Indian, Pakistani earth quakes are examples.

well india should transport the aid food to delhi where millions are starving.

Its aid for Afghanis,

I think all bags of wheat should be unload from trucks, open and check each bag ( so there should be no suicide jackets or weapons) and again pack them and deliver to Afghanistan.
 
Last edited:
On a serious note, Pakistan is thinking of allowing it but there is the issue of thousands of indian trucks crossing Pakistan. There can be alot of security issues for indian trucks and drivers. There also needs to be a mechanism for visa and registration for trucks. Unloading are reloading is also not feasible. So the delay is because Pakistan wants to devise a proper and transparent mechanism for it.
I think all bags of wheat should be unload from trucks, open and check each bag ( so there should be no suicide jackets or weapons) and again pack them and deliver to Afghanistan.

That will be a huge headache for 50,000 tons of stuff. Probably will cost as much as buying it in Pakistan.
 
Anyone who is proud of his muslim identity and that includes Maulana Saad too

That "proud" misinformed and misguided person should first stop praying 40 times a day like a Hindu Brahmin priest and stop looking and wearing strange and then contemplate on what constitutes some of the philosophies of Islam.

Shows your islamophobia. You are also no one to talk on behalf of Muslims of India

I am among the few Muslims on the forum who regularly puts forth the true rational, scientific, logical and sensible nature and elements of Islam as against the Talib-type pronouncements that some others make. Who would a sensible non-Muslim like to engage with, my type or the second type ?

When was Shehla Rashid murdered by NATO?

What is the type of person who is against her ? A Hindutvadi. Would this type be not the same type of puppet of NATO like AQ, MB and TJ are ?

If you are talking about that mass murderer of Syria then yes he is opposed by NATO for now. If their strategic goals align then same NATO would start supporting him

@Foinikas :lol:
 
That "proud" misinformed and misguided person should first stop praying 40 times a day like a Hindu Brahmin priest and stop looking and wearing strange and then contemplate on what constitutes some of the philosophies of Islam.

Hey dumb Islamophobe. First of all there are no 40 times prayers but 5 times prayers. And they are made obligatory on all muslims by Allah and His Prophet (SAW) and whether you like it or not you have to offer them if you are a muslim

All your philosophies are useless if you don't offer your prayers

If you are comparing 5 times prayers with some hindu priest and his prayers then I am going to get your socialist as$ kicked off from this forum. No insult of muslim prayers are accepted on this forum

I am among the few Muslims on the forum who regularly puts forth the true rational, scientific, logical and sensible nature and elements of Islam as against the Talib-type pronouncements that some others make. Who would a sensible non-Muslim like to engage with, my type or the second type ?

You are an islamphobe you scumbag. You hate people just because they have a beard or observe hijab

You are a bigot who hates people based on their appearance just like islamophobes of India and Europe

What is the type of person who is against her ? A Hindutvadi. Would this type be not the same type of puppet of NATO like AQ, MB and TJ are ?

Hindutvadis are also against Christian missionary. That doesn't mean that we would make them leaders of muslims of India
 
Why will Pakistan face criticism internally or externally? Aid is for Afghanistan, not for Pakistan. 2nd, On war like situations like flood, earth quake, no country will reject aid, even from enemy country? Indian, Pakistani earth quakes are examples.



Its aid for Afghanis,

I think all bags of wheat should be unload from trucks, open and check each bag ( so there should be no suicide jackets or weapons) and again pack them and deliver to Afghanistan.

Not a long ago, imran khan allowed direct flights from Kashmir to UAE..... But after criticism, he again blocked...

There are many other examples as well.. Imran khan does not affair for taking U-turns.
 
If you are comparing 5 times prayers with some hindu priest and his prayers then I am going to get your socialist as$ kicked off from this forum. No insult of muslim prayers are accepted on this forum

That forum has permitted me quite some radical ideas but if that happens then it would be not quite a good image of the forum. The forum would have succumbed to jaahils like you who can't engage with people in a rational and logical manner. Below is what the Islamic scholar, Ghulam Ahmed Parvez, first of undivided India and then of Pakistan said of your favorite TJ types :
In a series of essays for the magazine he used verses from the Qu’ran, incidents from the faith’s history and insights from the writings of Muhammad Iqbal to claim:

The clergy and conservative ulema have hijacked Islam.

They are agents of the rich people and promoters of uncontrolled Capitalism.

Socialism best enforces Qur’anic dictums on property, justice and distribution of wealth.

Islam’s main mission was the eradication of all injustices and cruelties from society. It was a socio-economic movement, and the Prophet was a leader seeking to put an end to the capitalist exploitation of the Quraysh merchants and the corrupt bureaucracy of Byzantium and Persia.

According to the Qur’an, Muslims have three main responsibilities: seeing, hearing and sensing through the agency of the mind. Consequently, real knowledge is based on empirically verifiable observation, or through the role of science.

Poverty is the punishment of God and deserved by those who ignore science.

In Muslim/Islamic societies, science, as well as agrarian reform should play leading roles in developing an industrialised economy.

A socialist path is a correction of the medieval distortion of Islam through Shari’a.
Go debate with the ghost of this man.

As for the rest of your post and the previous post, I advise you to debate with the ghost of your Pakistani Communist Jam Saqi whose thread I had tagged you in and you hadn't replied. I also advise you to depart immediately to Syria and fight the forces of "dictator" ( to you and to NATO ) Assad.
 
Last edited:
If that happens then it would be not quite a good image of the forum. The forum would have succumbed to jaahils like you who can't engage with people in a rational and logical manner.

As for the rest of your post and the previous post, I advise you to debate with the ghost of your Pakistani Communist Jam Saqi whose thread I had tagged you in and you hadn't replied. I also advise you to depart immediately to Syria and fight the forces of "dictator" ( to you and to NATO ) Assad.

This forum is for Pakistan and its defense. Pakistan was founded on the name of Islam and at least 96% of whole population is muslim

You try to insult our prayers one more time and I would make sure that you would be turned pink for that

And I didn't reply on Jam Saqi thread. Because he was someone who had no impact on Pakistan or its society thanks to the dead ideology he followed and hence wasn't important enough to get a reply from me
 
If you are talking about that mass murderer of Syria then yes he is opposed by NATO for now. If their strategic goals align then same NATO would start supporting him
One question:

Do you like Erdogan?
 
You try to insult our prayers one more time and I would make sure that you would be turned pink for that

Who is "our" ? How are you speaking for 1.8 billion Muslims in the world some of whom are naive yes but some of whom will laugh at you and oppose you ? And please make your fine points to the ghost of the Islamic scholar, Ghulam Ahmed Parvez, first of undivided India and then of Pakistan who said of your favorite TJ types :
In a series of essays for the magazine he used verses from the Qu’ran, incidents from the faith’s history and insights from the writings of Muhammad Iqbal to claim:

The clergy and conservative ulema have hijacked Islam.

They are agents of the rich people and promoters of uncontrolled Capitalism.

Socialism best enforces Qur’anic dictums on property, justice and distribution of wealth.

Islam’s main mission was the eradication of all injustices and cruelties from society. It was a socio-economic movement, and the Prophet was a leader seeking to put an end to the capitalist exploitation of the Quraysh merchants and the corrupt bureaucracy of Byzantium and Persia.

According to the Qur’an, Muslims have three main responsibilities: seeing, hearing and sensing through the agency of the mind. Consequently, real knowledge is based on empirically verifiable observation, or through the role of science.

Poverty is the punishment of God and deserved by those who ignore science.

In Muslim/Islamic societies, science, as well as agrarian reform should play leading roles in developing an industrialised economy.

A socialist path is a correction of the medieval distortion of Islam through Shari’a.
This scholar lived decades before you were born and he had different view points to you.

Pakistan was founded on the name of Islam

From the above article :
Understandably, Parvez was right away attacked by conservative Islamic scholars and political outfits.

But this didn’t stop famous Muslim philosopher and poet, Muhammad Iqbal, to befriend the young scholar and then introduce him to the future founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

Jinnah appointed Parvez to edit a magazine, Talu-e-Islam. It was set-up to propagate the creation of a separate Muslim country and to also answer the attacks that Jinnah’s All India Muslim League had begun to face from conservative Islamic parties and ulemawho accused the League of being a pseudo-Muslim organisation and Jinnah for being too westernised and ‘lacking correct Islamic behavior.’
So you will oppose a scholar who Iqbal and Jinnah promoted ?

And I didn't reply on Jam Saqi thread. Because he was someone who had no impact on Pakistan or its society thanks to the dead ideology he followed and hence wasn't important enough to get a reply from me

Ah yes, wasn't important enough for you. And how will you reply on threads about TTP and TLP ?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom