What's new

China prepared for military confrontation, will annihilate all Indian troops: Chinese media warns PM

Dude, It's 67. Everything is running by a scripts. Be patient. You will get what do you want soon or later.
The USA is planning to attact South Korea, I guess you lost your priority temporarily. Someone says India is used as a chess to pin down China from South Korea issue. We are quite astonished why the India willings to be a dog for them. Maybe Modi already sold India to USA for something.

Can you tell us your "citizen score" ?

Your govt. want you to be proud of it. Please demonstrate pride and share that score with us. Thanking you in advance.
 
Annihilate all of Indian military :lol:...My god...when will Chinese media stop bragging.

OMG. It seems that the power of India is not directly proportional to arrogance.:-)

Indian Army ammunition won’t even last 10 days in event of a war, suggests CAG reports

India is good at provocation, but not good at war. To put it simply, India is considering a conflict, but China is preparing for war.

I heard that India can't even make cannon... Is that true?
:-)
Saudis Use Chinese-made Cannons in Yemen

$

PLZ-45

Saudi PLZ-45 howitzers have been deployed to the border in preparation of Operation Decisive Storm. Currently firing at Houthi rebel positions like artillery bombing Saudi border posts, the PLZ-45s will advance alongside any Arab intervention force into Yemen.

Reuters

The Saudi Army is deploying its best cannons, the NORINCO PLZ-45 self propelled howitzer (SPH) to bombard Houthi rebels in western Yemen. This is the first time that a modern Chinese SPH has seen combat. While Saudi Arabia has bought primarily American weapons, recent advances in Chinese artillery technology has actually made Chinese artillery more capable in many respects over its American counterparts.

PLZ-45 IN ACTION

The PLZ-45 is the artillery workhorse of the Saudi Army, it can a range of nearly 40km and can fire American and Chinese made smart munitions guided by lasers and satellite navigation, as well as cluster munitions.

Reuters

The PLZ-45 is a 33 ton artillery vehicle, with a 6.97 meter long cannon that fires guided and unguided 50kg 155mm shells up to 39 kilometers away (in contrast, the America M109A7 Paladin's shorter cannon has a 30km maximum range). First developed in the 1980s, the PLZ-45 did not see widespread Chinese service, though its bigger descendant, the 50km ranged PLZ-04, is in widespread PLA service. The PLZ-45 comes with an ammunition supply vehicle that carries 90 shells, as well as sophisticated counterbattery and fire control radars, in addition to forward observation scouts.

$

KUWAITI GUNS

While Kuwait has chosen to buy western equipment such as the American M1A1 Abrams tank, it has ordered 75 PLZ-45 SPHs from China. The original 1998 purchase of 27 was intended as a political favor for Beijing, but the Kuwaiti was satisfied enough to keep ordering more cannons.

www.fyjs.cn

Currently, over 200 PLZ-45 SPHs have been sold by China's NORINCO weapons manufacturer to Algeria, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Especially noteworthy is that while Saudi Arabia also possesses American made M109A5 and French AMX-GCT SPHs, they have chosen more capable Chinese made artillery to take the lead in Operation Decisive Storm, the Arab intervention into Yemen. However, we should not be too surprised at the use of Chinese land weapons; as the 2014 U.S. Defense Department's China Military Power Report noted that Chinese defense contractors like NORINCO are producing world class weapons systems not just in new areas like drones, but also in traditional technology like armored vehicles.

http://www.popsci.com/saudis-use-chinese-made-cannons-yemen#page-3

Can you tell us your "citizen score" ?

Your govt. want you to be proud of it. Please demonstrate pride and share that score with us. Thanking you in advance.
Oh, the pride of India? Tell us your opinion. What is the pride of India? Or what did you do for 70 years?
BTW, Indians have always had high marks in China. They make countless jokes...

The real gap between China and India
 
& bite, we are br
OMG. It seems that the power of India is not directly proportional to arrogance.:-)

Indian Army ammunition won’t even last 10 days in event of a war, suggests CAG reports

India is good at provocation, but not good at war. To put it simply, India is considering a conflict, but China is preparing for war.


I heard that India can't even make cannon... Is that true?
:-)

They can and do make cannons , but operates 100s of advanced cannons is something that should worry you more .
 
They can and do make cannons , but operates 100s of advanced cannons is something that should worry you more .
Really???
As always, a lying nation will not stop lying.

Fake Chinese spares for indigenised Bofors guns

Even parts of basic weapons such as cannon rely on imports from China.:-)


Can all the chinese posters in pdf give us their "citizen score" ?


That way we can know who are the "good" chinese and who are the bad "chinese".

Please cooperate with us and provide us your score as provided by your communist govt. We thank you in advance.
Oh, lovely India friends don't seem to understand... There is no "superpower" propaganda here. Recently, too many Indians have exposed their morbid fanaticism.
Indians need to explain the identity in the PDF, Dalit or brahman. This will affect our attitude.

But I've been weird even if you're in a foreign forum. Still believe in your "superpower" campaign?

Haha, garbage is always garbage.:lol:

The real gap between China and India

360截图20161006020936571.jpg


Awww ....... are you ashamed of your true citizenship as a chinese ? :lol:

Tell us your "citizenship score" so that we can know what a good little citizen you have been. The communist party will be so proud.
Indians in China... Citizen score - 0. It's nice to see indiapigs brainwashed by the “superpower”.:lol:

https://www.internations.org/china-expats/indians
http://indiansinchina.com/
128248157_14427171638111n.jpg

7078951baa274b9362da0039d288d88b.gif

37f08cbfcfb648e2a4de59844f9a13a8_700_0_max_jpg_30.jpg

a09759f0gy1fflz5pjg11j21120ku0vz.jpg

t0194381d02b12a4263.jpg
t01db3af507784bf05c.jpg

360截图20170809022929451.jpg

Img379700687.jpg

:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Last edited:
Sikhs would be first in line to get some dibs on girly Chinese soldiers.

Girly Chinese soldiers will learn 'once you go sardar, you have no need to go back' ;)
I heard that the price of children's prostitute in India is 5 rupees once? Please try not to expose your dirty thoughts. It makes people feel sick. Oh sorry, my mistake... It's almost impossible to find anything clean in India.

Ah, it seems that Indian fantasies are seriously out of touch with reality. I've been thinking, since the war started, what else does India have besides the mouth?

Indian Army ammunition won’t even last 10 days in event of a war, suggests CAG reports
 
Last edited:
Chinese wet dreams are funny :lol:
But I think Indian confidence is the most interesting. Just like 1962.:lol:

A 'Crash Landing': The Slow and Painful Death of India's Air Force

LCA_Tejas.jpg


The Obama Administration is gearing up to sell eight new Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon jets to Pakistan, the New York Times reports. Those jets will add to Pakistan’s fleet of seventy-six existing “Vipers” as the type is colloquially known. Meanwhile, its arch-nemesis India’s air force shrinks by the day as planes age out and squadron are disbanded.

Assuming Pakistan completes the sale, the eight F-16s would help boost that country’s fleet of eighteen existing advanced Block 52+ Vipers. The rest of the Pakistani F-16 fleet consists of modified A-model jets that have been upgraded to Block 15 MLU standard, which bring those aircraft nearly up to the same capability as the newest Block 52+ jets.


Pakistan is also buying more than 150 Pakistan Aeronautical Complex/Chengdu JF-17 Thunder fighters. According to Flight International’s World Air Forces Directory 2015—Pakistan currently has forty-nine of the aircraft in service with 100 more on order. The JF-17 ultimately originates as an extensive redesign of the Chendu F7, which was originally a license-built MiG-21 derivative. Powered by a Russian-made Klimov RD-93—which is a version of the MiG-29’s engine—the JF-17 provides decent capability at low prices. It is likely that the JF-17 will replace Pakistan’s geriatric fleet of Chengdu F-7s, Mirage IIIs and Mirage Vs.


The rest of Pakistan’s fleet is composed of 140 Chinese-made F-7P and F-7PG fighters, which are a Chinese copy of the Mikoyan MiG-21. The aircraft have been upgraded with Italian-built Grifo-Mk-II radars, but are now obsolete. There are also roughly 157 French-built Dassault Mirage IIIs and Mirage Vs in service with the Pakistani air force. But while the F-7 will eventually be replaced by the JF-17, it’s not clear what Pakistan’s intentions are to replace the Mirage fighters.

The bottom line for Pakistan is that while its air force can’t compete with the Indian air force in terms of numbers, it is upgrading its forces and potentially even growing. Meanwhile, India’s air force is shrinking.

The overall balance of power in South Asia rests with India—but that nation is increasingly being challenged by an ever more powerful China, even if Pakistan is not quite the threat it once was. But the Indian military—particularly its air force is suffering due to that nation’s dysfunctional government, incompetent bureaucracy and intransigent negotiating tactics.

The Indian air force is required to muster a strength of forty-two combat aircraft squadrons, however, due to decades of negligence it can barely manage to operatethirty-five units. That number could further shrink and hit a low of twenty-five squadrons if nothing is done to staunch the bleeding.

Part of the problem is a lack of trained pilots, but mostly it’s India’s inability to select a new fighter and complete negotiations in a timely manner—or really at all. The prime example of Indian bureaucratic incompetence is the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) competition, which started with an Indian air force requirement for 126 fighters in 2001. While the Dassault Rafale eventually “won” the competition in 2011—nearly ten years later—India managed to derail the negotiations with various unreasonable demands that neither the French government or Dassault would ever agree to. Ultimately, the MMRCA program was cancelled earlier this year.

India is currently negotiating to buy thirty-six Rafales directly from the French government; a deal is allegedly imminent by the end of the year. But given India’s track record—that’s dubious at best. But the Indian air force still needs at least 120 medium combat aircraft with similar capability to the Rafale. Indeed, the Indians still hope to buy more Rafales, but they might have to extend production of the indigenous Tejas to keep their fleet numbers up.

But the problem with India’s HAL Tejas is that it is one of the single worst fighter projects that has ever been conceived of in the history of aviation. Even as it enters service, the aircraft is obsolete and is probably inferior in many respects to the JF-17. The jet has 57 known deficiencies and will probably get a lot of Indian pilots killed if any type of conflict were ever to break out.

Meanwhile, the one bright spot for the Indian air force is the Sukhoi Su-30MKI. While the Indians have had some issues with the Russians in supporting the Flanker-H, the 220 Su-30s that are currently in service are that country’s first line of defense. India will ultimately buy 272 Flanker-H fighters, but it should give serious consideration to extending that buy until its air force recovers some of its numerical strength. Basically, India should consider scrapping the Tejas and buying 120 or more additional Flankers.

In the future, the Indians are likely to buy a derivative of Russia’s T-50 PAK-FA stealth fighter. But the Indian-Russian co-development effort is a rocky one—and it is unclear how many jets will ultimately be delivered to the Indian air force and when. India is also developing it’s own fifth-generation fighter—but given it’s previous efforts on the Tejas, it’s not likely to fly any time soon.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...w-painful-death-indias-air-force-14149?page=2
 
Can you tell us your "citizen score" ?

Your govt. want you to be proud of it. Please demonstrate pride and share that score with us. Thanking you in advance.
I don't know what do you mean. Maybe you are talking about some propaganda again. But I do know we will score the foreigner in our country, like A,B,C.

Of course I am very proud of my country. After visiting India for months, I understand how great my country is even more.

Everything happens for reasons, you Indianese are too simple to understand the diplomatic way. In RPC's history, every wars started at the similar way, include 1962's.

Again, I just want to say, you are wrong with us. Once we believe the world understand our justice well, It's time to beat your naive India.
 
Last edited:
Chinese wet dreams are funny :lol:
UK's GDP is even small than his former colony, India, don't you UK fell shame.

The empire on which the sun never sets , is now only a dog for USA now, It's the British dream? very impressive.

As for our Chinse dream, only US is on our way now. We leave the little UK behind, long time ago.
 
you mean 1967 :lol:

China should stop ratcheting up 1962, remember 1967 Nathu La battle

NEW DELHI: Notwithstanding rise in China's power and military strength, Nathu La is physiologically a weak spot for the People's Liberation Army, akin to the Sino-Vietnam border, having lost to the Indian and Vietnamese counterparts in 1967 and 1979, respectively.

The Indian military, overcoming the loss in 1962, had dealt a severe blow to PLA in 1967 in Nathu La sector that resulted in the death of 400 Chinese soldiers, a fact neither debated in Beijing nor Delhi. The Vietnamese ..

The Nathu La and Cho La clashes, (September 11-14, 1967 for Nathu La; October 1, 1967 for Cho La) were a series of clashes between India and China along the Sikkim border. According to an Sino-Indian expert, the conflict ended with the defeat of China. Indian troops drove back the attacking forces. Many PLA fortifications at Nathu La were destroyed.

Starting from August 13, 1967, Chinese troops started digging trenches in Nathu La across the Indian border. After Indian troopsdrove back the attacking forces. Many PLA fortifications at Nathu La were destroyed.

Starting from August 13, 1967, Chinese troops started digging trenches in Nathu La across the Indian border. After Indian troops observed that some trenches were inside Sikkim, it asked the local Chinese commander to withdraw from the then Indian protectorate state.

On October 1, 1967, another clash between India and China took place at Cho La, a few km north of Nathu La. According to the Indian government version with which neutral experts concur, the clash was initiated by the Chinese troops after a scuffle between the two, when the Chinese troops infiltrated into Sikkim, claimed the pass and questioned the position of Indian troops.

According to the defence ministry, 88 Indian Army personnel were killed and 163 wounded while China lost 340 soldiers and 450 were wounded during the two incidents.
Self make up story, I applause your desperate effort. :lol:
 
Funny fiction to defence your poor dignity. Thanks for sharing us this joke.
The indian always love to self make up story or article to boast their ego in reality. They cant win Chinese in real world but sure they are great in their delusion mind. :lol:

If anybody want, sure they can make up plenty of things to brag about.

But surely these footage cannot be make up and is life footage during the fateful 1962.


Indian simply cant produce any concrete proof for their fantasy battle to back their numbers and outcome. :enjoy:
 
you mean 1967 :lol:

China should stop ratcheting up 1962, remember 1967 Nathu La battle

NEW DELHI: Notwithstanding rise in China's power and military strength, Nathu La is physiologically a weak spot for the People's Liberation Army, akin to the Sino-Vietnam border, having lost to the Indian and Vietnamese counterparts in 1967 and 1979, respectively.

The Indian military, overcoming the loss in 1962, had dealt a severe blow to PLA in 1967 in Nathu La sector that resulted in the death of 400 Chinese soldiers, a fact neither debated in Beijing nor Delhi. The Vietnamese ..

The Nathu La and Cho La clashes, (September 11-14, 1967 for Nathu La; October 1, 1967 for Cho La) were a series of clashes between India and China along the Sikkim border. According to an Sino-Indian expert, the conflict ended with the defeat of China. Indian troops drove back the attacking forces. Many PLA fortifications at Nathu La were destroyed.

Starting from August 13, 1967, Chinese troops started digging trenches in Nathu La across the Indian border. After Indian troopsdrove back the attacking forces. Many PLA fortifications at Nathu La were destroyed.

Starting from August 13, 1967, Chinese troops started digging trenches in Nathu La across the Indian border. After Indian troops observed that some trenches were inside Sikkim, it asked the local Chinese commander to withdraw from the then Indian protectorate state.

On October 1, 1967, another clash between India and China took place at Cho La, a few km north of Nathu La. According to the Indian government version with which neutral experts concur, the clash was initiated by the Chinese troops after a scuffle between the two, when the Chinese troops infiltrated into Sikkim, claimed the pass and questioned the position of Indian troops.

According to the defence ministry, 88 Indian Army personnel were killed and 163 wounded while China lost 340 soldiers and 450 were wounded during the two incidents.
OMG!!! Really?
But... We all know that Indians are lying expert.Tell me - India uses stone to beat a nuclear weapon state in 1967?:lol:

bbb74c3b-c728-47ee-94a4-98efc3c17c48.jpg

t0175a83a400f268d9e.jpg

t0157222bb8fd80978b.jpg

t01524ee7c8c10876bf.jpg

20151017112101896.jpg

t01d71153819f704976.jpg

"Superpower" lies don't need logic :rofl:
 
India should look around and see how many of her neighbours using chinese made equipment and realise that her neighbours are china allies
 
The indian always love to self make up story or article to boast their ego in reality. They cant win Chinese in real world but sure they are great in their delusion mind. :lol:

If anybody want, sure they can make up plenty of things to brag about.

But surely these footage cannot be make up and is life footage during the fateful 1962.


Indian simply cant produce any concrete proof for their fantasy battle to back their numbers and outcome. :enjoy:
Concur.

Yesterday, indiatoday.intoday.in thinks for a few days, and releases a news, the say, India are better than China in 5 aspects. And the 5 aspects are all jokes. Even theirs people won't believe it.
 
I hope china will use opportunity to take back some of the disputed areas but most importantly china must win more global approval before commencing this war.

Maybe tawang can be taken back as well
:china:
 
Back
Top Bottom