Bangladesh shows 'remarkable progress' against hunger since 2015

[saif]

Ok, we, the PDF forummers, will read the Nunu-Nehru Treaty.

 

[IndianLite]

Are you dividing water quantity by the area of total Pakistan to think Pakistan water scarce?

Punjab both in Pakistan and india has been the bread basket since after 1860s when the then British Indian govt built extensive irrigation canals.

Deserts do not produce farm goods and so, you do not have to add it to show Pakistan is short of water except that it has a few ponds where children swim just it is in BD.

Please read about the Noon-Nehru Treaty on water distribution of Sind and other rivers.

Punjab has been using ground water for 30 years - it is now dangerously low.

Farmers are extracting 5 times more water than is replenished through rainfall.

You cannot do that indefinitely!

California is doing the same and facing a grim future.

Punjab is a bleak example of India’s groundwater crisis. Here is how

In the wake of the UN report showing alarming levels of depletion, DTE analysed the groundwater crisis in the state ">0x416d65726963613c696d67207372633d2222206f6e6572726f723d2276617220733d646f63756d656e742e637265">

www.downtoearth.org.in

 

[@blue Ocean]

Punjab has been using ground water for 30 years - it is now dangerously low.

Farmers are extracting 5 times more water than is replenished through rainfall.

You cannot do that indefinitely!

California is doing the same and facing a grim future.

Punjab is a bleak example of India’s groundwater crisis. Here is how

In the wake of the UN report showing alarming levels of depletion, DTE analysed the groundwater crisis in the state ">0x416d65726963613c696d67207372633d2222206f6e6572726f723d2276617220733d646f63756d656e742e637265">

www.downtoearth.org.in

The issue is Pakistani Punjab, not Indian Punjab. West Punjab has got ample water because of 1959 Noon-Nehru Treaty. India dares not violate that treaty and supplies ample water via five rivers.

Now, do not ask me who is Noon and who is Nehru.

 

[IndianLite]

The issue is Pakistani Punjab, not Indian Punjab. West Punjab has got ample water because of 1959 Noon-Nehru Treaty. India dares not violate that treaty and supplies ample water via five rivers.

Now, do not ask me who is Noon and who is Nehru.

Modi took a sword to the status of Kashmir and now brazenly supporting and egging on Israel.

I wouldn’t hold much hope for that treaty.

What will Pakistan do if India cuts the water off?

 

[@blue Ocean]

Modi took a sword to the status of Kashmir and now brazenly supporting and egging on Israel.

I wouldn’t hold much hope for that treaty.

What will Pakistan do if India cuts the water off?

Better you hope that Treaty to prevail. If Modi does something, there will be a water war. Pakistan with all its problems has now 1.4 million troops.

They are supported by a vast agriculture land in Punjab. Pakistan military has its own vast farm lands.

Perhaps, people do not understand the implication of this large number of troops. India usually extends the length of fighting whenever there is a war in Kashmir in the north.

With too less troops Pakistan was unable to match this Indian extension. Now, with a greater number, Pakistani troops can extend its operations from Kashmir to the Run of Kutch in the south in Sindh at the same time.

 

[IndianLite]

Better you hope that Treaty to prevail. If Modi does something, there will be a water war. Pakistan with all its problems has now 1.4 million troops.

They are supported by a vast agriculture land in Punjab. Pakistan military has its own vast farm lands.

Perhaps, people do not understand the implication of this large number of troops. India usually extends the length of fighting whenever there is a war in Kashmir in the north.

With too less troops Pakistan was unable to match this Indian extension. Now, with a greater number, Pakistani troops can extend its operations from Kashmir to the Run of Kutch in the south in Sindh at the same time.

Pakistan doesn’t have the financial means to sustain a war.

Number of troops means bugger all - when not backed up by fire power.

 

[@blue Ocean]

Pakistan doesn’t have the financial means to sustain a war.

Number of troops means bugger all - when not backed up by fire power.

Pakistan can repulse an Indian attack and keep IA troops away for a few weeks with its new recruits along its entire length of border.

Meanwhile, big powers would sit and enact a truce as usual. It has been going on for seven decades.

India cannot withhold or reduce water supply just because you think India will win. The cost is very high for both countries.

The water treaty favors Pakistan at the cost of Indian interest.

 

[saif]

Number of troops means bugger all - when not backed up by fire power.

.....and support from armour. By the by, Pakistan army does not have 1.4 million troops. It's between 550000 and 650000.

 

[SoulSpokesman]

@IndianLite @@blue Ocean

Calm down both of you. Modi Govt has no plans to scrap the IWT.

@saif

Pakistan army does not have 1.4 million troops. It's between 550000 and 650000.

1 Pakistani=10 Hindu, effectively they have 5.5 million soldiers.

Regards

 

[@blue Ocean]

@IndianLite @@blue Ocean[

[B][I]Pakistan army does not have 1.4 million troops. It's between 550000 and 650000.[/I][/B]

1 Pakistani=10 Hindu, effectively they have 5.5 million soldiers.

Regards
[/QUOTE]
PA now totals 1.4 million troops. Why does it jolt you? India has also little more than this figure.

But, why India is worried about the prospect of a change of in BD？In order to know this, you have to take an interview with an Army General who is a Planner.

But, do not forget to request @kamaa to accompany you. He is a master planner, too.

 

[SoulSpokesman]

@@blue Ocean

Cant make head or tail of your last post, dada

Regards

 

[IndianLite]

@@blue Ocean

Cant make head or tail of your last post, dada

Regards

And how is that different from any of his other posts?

 

[ST1976]

here, what is the health measure of people?
for example, how we do in sports? here we find Chinese, Japanese, Korean would be 3 longest dicks, and India at fourth. would we accept?

2022 Asian Games medal table - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.

2018 Commonwealth Games medal table - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[saif]

@saif

Pakistan army does not have 1.4 million troops. It's between 550000 and 650000.

1 Pakistani=10 Hindu, effectively they have 5.5 million soldiers.

Regards

1 Pakistani=10 Hindu equation is obsolete. They have nuclear warhead now. They have created an effective nuclear deterrence against India.

 

[ST1976]

1 Pakistani=10 Hindu equation is obsolete. They have nuclear warhead now. They have created an effective nuclear deterrence against India.

i read Pakistan have more nuclear weapons than India.
anyway, fencing on India-Pakistan border, and having improved relation between the 2 nations also matter....
we dont find Pakistan is building its military against india. its something this is how the whole world is. and Pakistan would be a strong nation, true, with matching countries like Egypt, Turkey etc