Army Chief Believes No Political Party Is Sincere With Country, Says Businessman Motiwala

[HAIDER]

Yes they are sincere with their courption, zia ul haq fitna, ayab fitna, musharaf fitna then bajwa now asim.


View attachment 951360

corps commander defend smuggling, irani oil, bajwa defend dha seller n buyer no tax on land purchasing
MNA senatator said we will not pay tax on stell industry, tobaco n agriculture product.
All business man give middle finger to FBR on taxes

No doubt, its beyond military control, even they try, they fail all positive moves which benefits Pak economy

 

[PradoTLC]

10 Reasons Why Pakistan's Army Chief is Preparing for Dictatorship

Hard talking #pakistani journalist #wajahatsaeedkhan covers #pakistan #pakistannews #pakistanarmy and the #pakistani diaspora like nobody else. His latest re...

www.youtube.com

 

[Nasr]

With Pak-Army Generals raking in $$ millions $$ off the back of Pakistani People, he is NO ONE to lecture us about who is corrupt.

Asim Munir is a Zionist lapdog, a "Yes Man" of Washington DC & London.

 

[PradoTLC]

With Pak-Army Generals raking in $$ millions $$ off the back of Pakistani People, he is NO ONE to lecture us about who is corrupt.

Asim Munir is a Zionist lapdog, a "Yes Man" of Washington DC & London.

forget generals.... their daughter in laws are racking in billions of rupees

General Qamar Bajwa’s family became billionaires in six years - Times of India

Pakistan News: Pakistan’s outgoing army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa’s extended family became billionaires after he took command of the military in 2016, accumul

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

 

[Edevelop]

There is truth in this. No political party is sincere. But as much as I like Asim Munir I question was Bajwa and other generals sincere??? Why don’t they take any action against them?

 

[allaisa]

If army can remove Sharifs, Zardaris and religious parties from politics, declare Pakistan a secular republic, then they have my support.

To that add, "If the Army removes ITSELF from power and goes back to barracks etc." When an Institution accounts for 40% of the Country's budget it should show SOME accomplishments (engineering Coups is NOT an accomplishment).

 

[LeGenD]

To that add, "If the Army removes ITSELF from power and goes back to barracks etc." When an Institution accounts for 40% of the Country's budget it should show SOME accomplishments (engineering Coups is NOT an accomplishment).

Ideally.

And what to do about corrupt politicians and dynasty politics? Pakistani judiciary has failed to bring these people to justice.

Pakistan's current system has flopped because it supports dynasty politics instead of cultivating true democracy.

Pakistan needs to revisit its leadership system. Presidential model will do.

 

[Goritoes]

Someone wake this sharabi and tell him the reality that it was Army that ruled Pakistan for most, it was the Army who cause Pakistan to break into pieces, and its was them who brought extremism into our society, and it was the Army who causes Pakistan's political system to rely on their help.

 

[salarsikander]

But one who breaks their own oath repeatedly is sincere to their country?
The one who wears uniforms and calls Fatimah Jinnah a bitch is sincere
The one who breaks the country into two and sends another 60k as cannon fodder to lose a lost war is sincere to the country?
The one who licks American boots are sincere to the country by always retiring abroad
Swuars of the highest order

 

[Jazzbot]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1699068584880972264

https://twitter.com/x/status/1699054508595134611

And as expected, patwari ki phatt gai

 

[IceCold]

Lost half the country in war, and they consider themselves sincere. Oh Bhai jaan chor do humeri. We don't need you. Just **** off and leave Pakistan and Pakistanis from your so called patriotism.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

The elephant in the room is military establishment, Nawaz sharif was nurtured and brought into politics by Zia, earlier was pampered by general Jilani, he was a blue eyed boy of military, so the onus rest on the military for bringing this corrupt Sharif family into politics.

As for judiciary, who controls them and made them pliable, with orders not met by the military establishment.

And who has flouted the constitution with impunity, again it is the military establishment.

The root cause of all the devastation, and finally when a popular politician was elected and country was stabilizing and poised for growth, he was ousted for obvious reasons.

And the blame lies squarely on military establishment.

Ideally.

And what to do about corrupt politicians and dynasty politics? Pakistani judiciary has failed to bring these people to justice.

Pakistan's current system has flopped because it supports dynasty politics instead of cultivating true democracy.

Pakistan needs to revisit its leadership system. Presidential model will do.

 

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

View attachment 951376
Millennials and gen z can now watch zia 2.0 in making

They have taken turns, one general liberal comes, another religious, again a liberal, a religious . .. . the circle continue

 

[TriptiD]

Almost all national politicians in Pakistan after Jinnah and Liaqat Ali Khan have been sponsored by the military at some point or the other. Bhutto was blue-eyed boy of Ayub. Nawaz Sharif grew up in politics under Zia. Benazir was somewhat independent but took a NRO and Zardari did deals with the military. Imran Khan was selected by Bajwa to run his agenda, but Imran turned the tables oh him before taking things too far. Shahbaz was also the fauji choice among the available candidates.

The only politicians after Jinnah and Liaqat Khan who never compromised with the army were Fatimah Jinnah and Mujib and everyone knows what the army did to them.

 

[hembo]

This routine (every other decades) forceful attempts to set Governance in correct course by the Military is the reason democracy has never even come to maturity in Pakistan. If things were let as it is, inspite of the initial hiccups (incompetency, corruption etc.) from the beginning, things would have have fallen in place, slowly but surely. I'm not saying it would have been fully matured with zero corruption and great competency. But these would have slowly reduced significantly by now & the Pakistan governance would have made good strides towards a matured democracy. Instead, what we see since its inception is a vicious cycle of dictatorship followed by the same incompetent civil govt, which never got the required curing time to move towards competency.

Add a bit of other tadka (I would not say what) to it, you get a bad concrete which seldom cures.

9 pregnant women cannot together give birth a baby in 1 month.