GodToons
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,570
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
On the contrary Bihar Govt had data which they provided to the Central Govt how the Dam has dramatically affected Bihar, Hard to decide which one is the Jingoistic call. Bihar Govt or your post.
Read my post again... I am for Silt management. Only question is.. This person is CM of Bihar for last 10 years.. enlightenment came bit too late
The benefits of 'river linking' is not a slam dunk compared to the cost. However it is your money and your decision....
I think Indian inter state issues will be bigger....
What is the problem?
- Article 246 and 7th Sch. the states have exclusive jurisdiction over waters in their territories, including inter-state rivers
- This provision prevents Union and Judiciary to settle the issue.
- It has also stopped the Centre from clearly defined water rights among states, and end the long drawn legal battles.
- The latest example is the second Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal. It has turned into a warzone, with a battery of lawyers, technical staff and irrigation department officials from Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. Everyone fighting to win the maximum allocation of the Krishna river for their respective state.
Yes. Certain variety of Rice needs water to mature before harvest. The dam keeps the water from flowing away. This is needed mainly in Northern districts.
Agreed with your points.. few states like Rajasthan, MP and Gujarat are doing it within their states. Lets start doing it