What's new

When India was Importing. Pakistan was making

India had been making drones in the 90s,Lakshya and Nishant are two names I can remember as of now. I've given you two sources,but you have chosen to call them unreliable. I'll give you more sources if I find them.

Lakshya was a target uav... nishant was? inducted in 2012.... as for your sources... they also claim Argo ATV is a Pak product.. so much for reliablity and corrent info... meanwhile ive provided you your own indian sources about nishant in troubles over/delayed induction in 2011-12... etc...
 
That was because of our politicians act. We needed more funds for future projects and we didn't got it.
Yes it is due to politicians only... but common Pakistani will elect their leader.. If you say the failure is because of politicians then the actual failure is of common Pakistani... we are also democratic country, we also have all the negatives of democracy... but common Indian voters act smart at least once in a while. What makes India different is that we want to improve ourself and our future generation and we dont want to eat grass for the sake of pride and we dont want to starve to bleed some one else....
 
Lakshya was a target uav... nishant was? inducted in 2012.... as for your sources... they also claim Argo ATV is a Pak product.. so much for reliablity and corrent info... meanwhile ive provided you your own indian sources about nishant in troubles over/delayed induction in 2011-12... etc...

I've made it clear for you,Nishant is yet to a have squadron level induction. The system is not exactly the need for the hour of the army, and constant improvements are being made to cater for the limited and changing requirements of the army. Whether you question the use of Nishant or not, the point that India has been making and using its own UAV is proven.

New rotary takes flight in India - RotaryNews.com

And also,Laksya's importance isn't to be littled as it has helped us a lot. Its capable of doing 0.7 mach and has a range of 150 km, can be launched from land and sea.
 
second your "chopper" itself is a german MB design.

over 60% of it is still imported from over 3 dozen companies around the world

I've owned you many times before,now just tell me how a chopper designed by a design team of 250 Indian designers working with 15-30 German designers became 'German design' ? :lol:
 
I've owned you many times before,now just tell me how a chopper designed by a design team of 250 Indian designers working with 15-30 German designers became 'German design' ? :lol:

owned? bitch dont talk tough on internet... we know how shameless you are...... 19% input by indian scientist on an already production model turbomeca engine = indian.
MB desin = indian.
36 outsourcing countries... 70% imported shit ... still indian.. dont make me laugh.
 
owned? bitch dont talk tough on internet... we know how shameless you are...... 19% input by indian scientist on an already production model turbomeca engine = indian.

Thats it-Shakti engine is a JV.This is when many choppers use imported foreign engines.

MB desin = indian.

MB ? Whats that ? Mercedes Benz ? :omghaha:

''There are 15-30 West German engineers at the Bangalore site. This is set against a HAL design team of 250
engineers assisted by 700 technicians''

source:flightglobal june 1990


36 outsourcing countries... 70% imported shit ... still indian.. dont make me laugh.

Already proven wrong.Its not 70 percent as many key components are already manufactured locally.
 
Thats it-Shakti engine is a JV.This is when many choppers use imported foreign engines.



MB ? Whats that ? Mercedes Benz ? :omghaha:

''There are 15-30 West German engineers at the Bangalore site. This is set against a HAL design team of 250
engineers assisted by 700 technicians''

source:flightglobal june 1990




Already proven wrong.Its not 70 percent as many key components are already manufactured locally.

see the similarities gal?

dhruv_l4.jpg
SachsenAnhalt-BK117-(Wassew.jpg.2787038.jpg
 

See the differences..gal ?

MBB/Kawasaki BK 117


General characteristics

  • Capacity: up to 10 passengers
  • Length: 9.91 m (32 ft 6 in) (fuselage length)
  • Height: 3.85 m (12 ft 8 in) (rotors turning)
  • Empty weight: 1,727 kg (3,807 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 3,350 kg (7,385 lb)
  • Fuel capacity: 697 L (183 US Gallons, 153 Imp Gallons) internal fuel
  • Powerplant: 2 × Textron Lycoming LTS 101-750B-1 turboshaft, 442 kW (593 hp) each
  • Main rotor diameter: 11.00 m (36 ft 1 in)
  • Main rotor area: 95.03 m2 (1,022.9 sq ft)
Performance

  • Maximum speed: 250 km/h (155 mph; 135 kn) at sea level
  • Never exceed speed: 278 km/h (173 mph; 150 kn)
  • Range: 541 km (336 mi; 292 nmi)
  • Service ceiling: 4,575 m (15,010 ft) (max certified altitude)
  • Hover Ceiling: 3,565 m (11,700 ft) (in ground effect)
  • Rate of climb: 11.00 m/s (2,165 ft/min)

HAL Dhruv

 
owned? bitch dont talk tough on internet... we know how shameless you are...... 19% input by indian scientist on an already production model turbomeca engine = indian.
MB desin = indian.
36 outsourcing countries... 70% imported shit ... still indian.. dont make me laugh.
I've already quoted you on this,MBB was brought in as design consultants and their involvement was limited and ended at 1994-95. The Dhruv is an Indian heli,tailor made for Indian conditions. We were successful in developing its variants too. And regarding the components,as I said,in this globalized world its common to get the required parts from others. Step by step,these ones are being made by Indian companies. Indian companies too supply parts and systems for foreign aircrafts.
 
Funny title..... Those who dnt even know how to built cars and comparing themselves with a nation who is working for its own passenger jets.
 

Back
Top Bottom