What's new

Taliban in 72 percent of Afghanistan: report

This money will just land up in some corrupt politicians pockets. These refugees need to be kicked out, not taken care of.

I fully agree with your point of view. Pakistan has been abandoned and only pressured to do more and more whilst the war refugees from neighbouring Afghanistan are living as orphans in bad conditions. To make matters worse, the world expects Pakistan to host these refugees until the war is over and everyone keeps on turning a blind eye. The world doesn't care about the fate of these war orphans. Pakistan has for over a decade now hosted the largest amount of war refugees anywhere on the planet. I think it's high time to make sure that we start repatriating most refugees. Since the arrival of the refugees there has been a lot of conflict and problems amongst the locals. Also, the security situation has deteriorated. The world cannot expect Pakistan to carry this burden forever. I don't blame any refugee. It's just that there are cultural differences even amongst the local Pukhtoon community. I can say that with certainty because I'm a Pukhtoon and have visited Peshawar many times in the past few years.
 
Last edited:
Yes, we have to take this decision.Look at Karachi..The Afghanis are taking over jobs of poor Pakistanis (I am not talking about high end jobs..I am talking about low end jobs)
They all should be deported back to Afghanistan.
 
‘Afghan intelligence helping Taliban’

LAHORE: Afghan intelligence agents are sharing information about US and NATO troop movements with the Taliban, wanted Taliban commander Sirajiddin Haqqani has told NBC News. In an interview, Haqqni said, “The Afghan intelligence officials are sympathetic to the Taliban and they communicate the movements of the occupying forces [US and NATO] to us.” He said there were no moderate Taliban willing to talk to America. daily times monitor

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
Pakistan under assault from Afghanistan? Well, thank God it isn't the Afghani gov't intelligence. Is this the same Haqqani, btw, that everybody claimed blew up the Indian embassy in Kabul last summer?:lol:

Just imagine. A.M. was arguing about how the Afghan intel boss was a protege of Massoud.

Gotta love it. Can't wait to see everybody who actually BELIEVES it now.:agree:
 
Talaban should learn lesson from their mistakes , they should make peace deal with Afghan government if Afghan government agreed on implementation of Shariah law .
 
Of courseTalibans have penetrated in all afghanistan!(72percent).
bt why their reactions&attacks are so intense in pakistan.
everybody know that they are not useful for us & will not act like buffer for us .(why our army&ISI have so expectations to taliban?)
they are millitants they will remain millitants.
pak army should give them a strong doze .
ONE THING I WOULD AGAIN LIKE TO SAY THAT WE HAVE TO PROTECT OUR AFGHAN FRONTIER WITH HELP OF ARMY NT BY TRIBAL TROOPS OR SO CALLED BUFFERS.
 
Of courseTalibans have penetrated in all afghanistan!(72percent).
bt why their reactions&attacks are so intense in pakistan.
everybody know that they are not useful for us & will not act like buffer for us .(why our army&ISI have so expectations to taliban?)
they are millitants they will remain millitants.
pak army should give them a strong doze .
ONE THING I WOULD AGAIN LIKE TO SAY THAT WE HAVE TO PROTECT OUR AFGHAN FRONTIER WITH HELP OF ARMY NT BY TRIBAL TROOPS OR SO CALLED BUFFERS.

They can not panetrate in settled areas of Pakistan because local farmers are strong enough to protect their lands.In Punjab ,Frontier, Sindh and Balouchistan still jirga or punjayt system is effective .Local farmer will not allow these talaban to enter in their areas and capture their land.

Yes if GOP failed to provide support to local farmer then they story will be different.
 
Taliban in 72% of Afghanistan? Right, that's why only in Southern part people get killed and only in Southern part Taliban get captured, which doesn't even form 50% of Afghanistan. So this statement is definitely wrong.
 
Thats why ISI have still so many Contacts with Taliban

Pak Knows that West will never ever WIN Afghanistan & eventually they have to Leave
Let me be very clear, that the real Al-Qaida never believes in ISI as its always inclined towards the Pak-US relations ...
 
Rockets hit presidential palace, police headquarters in Afghanistan
Updated at: 1246 PST, Tuesday, August 18, 2009


KABUL: A Taliban rocket struck the grounds of Afghanistan's presidential palace on Tuesday, just two days before incumbent Hamid Karzai seeks re-election in tense polls that could go to a second round.

Polls show Karzai likely to win Thursday's vote, but not with the outright majority required to avoid a second round. He is relying on the last-minute support of former guerrilla chieftains in a bid to tip the balance.

His main rival Abdullah, an urbane eye doctor, has run an energetic campaign, seeking to garner support from beyond his base in the mainly ethnic-Tajik north.

Several small rockets were fired overnight and a police source said one caused some damage inside the sprawling, fortified presidential palace compound in central Kabul, while a second hit the capital's police headquarters. Neither caused any casualties.

Militants who have vowed to disrupt Thursday's election have fired rockets at the capital twice this month as well as detonated a massive suicide bomb outside the NATO-led International Security Force Headquarters (ISAF) in central Kabul that killed seven people and wounded dozens more.

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, in a message sent to foreign news agency, claimed the fighters had fired four rockets, but gave no further details.

Rockets hit presidential palace, police headquarters in Afghanistan - GEO.tv
 
India Befriends Afghanistan, Irking Pakistan


With $1.2 Billion in Pledged Aid, New Delhi Hopes to Help Build a Country That Is 'Stable, Democratic, Multiethnic'

By PETER WONACOTT

KABUL -- After shunning Afghanistan during the Taliban regime, India has become a major donor and new friend to the country's democratic government -- even if its growing presence here riles archrival Pakistan.

From wells and toilets to power plants and satellite transmitters, India is seeding Afghanistan with a vast array of projects. The $1.2 billion in pledged assistance includes projects both vital to Afghanistan's economy, such as a completed road link to Iran's border, and symbolic of its democratic aspirations, such as the construction of a new parliament building in Kabul. The Indian government is also paying to bring scores of bureaucrats to India, as it cultivates a new generation of Afghan officialdom.

India's aid has elevated it to Afghanistan's top tier of donors. In terms of pledged donations through 2013, India now ranks fifth behind the U.S., U.K., Japan and Canada, according to the Afghanistan government. Pakistan doesn't rank in the top 10.

Afghanistan is now the second-largest recipient of Indian aid after Bhutan. "We are here for the same reason the U.S. and others are here -- to see a stable, democratic, multiethnic Afghanistan," Indian Ambassador to Afghanistan Jayant Prasad said in an interview.

Such a future for Afghanistan is hardly assured, as the run-up to Thursday's presidential election shows. On Tuesday, a pair of mortar shells hit near the presidential palace in Kabul while Taliban insurgents attacked polling stations across the country, as part of wave of violence aimed at preventing people from casting ballots in the election.

Despite backing the Taliban in the past, Pakistan doesn't want to see an anarchic Afghanistan, say Pakistani security analysts.

"Pakistan is doing nothing to thwart the elections in Afghanistan and everything to help Afghanistan stabilize and have a truly representative government," says Gen. Jehangir Karamat, Pakistan's former ambassador to the U.S. and a retired army chief.

Yet India's largess has stirred concern in Pakistan, a country situated between Afghanistan and India that has seen its influence in Afghanistan wane following the collapse of the Taliban regime. At the heart of the tensions is the shared fear that Afghanistan could be used by one to destabilize the other.

"We recognize that Afghanistan needs development assistance from every possible source to address the daunting challenges it is facing. We have no issue with that," says Pakistani foreign-ministry spokesman Abdul Basit. "What Pakistan is looking for is strict adherence to the principle of noninterference."

View Full Image

Reuters
India is seeding Afghanistan with a vast array of projects such as a completed road link to Iran's border and the construction of a new parliament building in Kabul. A view of the city, above.
The two countries have sparred repeatedly about each other's activities in Afghanistan. Indian officials say their Pakistani counterparts have claimed that there are more than the official four Indian consulates in Afghanistan, and that they support an extensive Indian spy network. For years, Pakistan refused to allow overland shipment of fortified wheat biscuits from India to feed two million Afghan schoolchildren. India instead had to ship the biscuits through Iran, driving up costs for the program.

The World Food Program, which administers the shipments, said the Pakistan government gave its approval for overland shipment in 2008 -- six years after the first delivery from India. "Why did it take six years ... is something that WFP cannot answer," a spokesman for the aid organization said. "However, we are indeed thankful to the government of Pakistan for allowing transit for the fortified biscuits."

Mr. Basit, the foreign-ministry spokesman, didn't respond to a question about the Indian food assistance.

India's aid has extended well beyond physical infrastructure to the training of accountants and economists. For a nation devastated by decades of war, these soft skills fill a hole, says Noorullah Delawari, Afghanistan's former central-bank governor and now head of Afghanistan Investment Support Agency, an organization that promotes private enterprise. "The country shut down for 20 years," he said. "We stopped producing educated people to run our businesses and government offices."

Some believe there is room for cooperation between India and Pakistan in Afghanistan since both countries share an abiding interest in its stability. "The opportunity is there," says Gen. Karamat, "if we can get out of the straitjacket of the past."

—Matthew Rosenberg contributed to this article.
86645f875da8abcbd77ce9ace7f13bbd.gif
 
8 U.S. soldiers killed in Afghanistan

October 27, 2009 -- Updated 2026 GMT (0426 HKT)

Kabul, Afghanistan (CNN) -- The U.S. military suffered another day of heavy losses in Afghanistan on Tuesday as roadside bombs killed eight soldiers, two military officials told CNN.

An Afghan civilian working with NATO troops also was killed in the attacks in southern Afghanistan, the military said. The officials said that, according to initial reports, one blast took place just outside Kandahar and the other was in neighboring Zabul province.

Seven of the soldiers who died were traveling together in one vehicle, said Sgt. Jerome Baysmore with the International Security Assistance Force Joint Command.

The military gave no further details about the bombings, which it said also wounded several other service members. The official said one service member was killed in one attack, while the other seven were killed in the other attack.

The U.S. military described the bombings as "multiple complex IED attacks," which means they were followed by small arms fire, the official said. That has been the typical Taliban operational method for attacking U.S. forces in recent months, the official said.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs issued a statement of condolence: "As always our prayers go out to those who have lost a loved one and for those who sacrificed so much to serve our country."

The attacks happened a day after 14 Americans were killed in a pair of helicopter crashes in Afghanistan. The 14 deaths were the largest number of Americans killed in Afghanistan in a single day in more than four years.

With the deaths of two troops on Sunday, a total of 24 Americans -- most of them military -- have been killed in a 48-hour period. That makes October 2009, with 58 fatalities, the deadliest month for the U.S. military since the Afghanistan war began in October 2001.

Enemy action was not thought to be the cause of either of Monday's helicopter crashes. Three Drug Enforcement Administration special agents and seven U.S. troops were killed in one crash in western Afghanistan as they returned from a raid on a compound believed to be harboring insurgents tied to drug trafficking.

The other crash, in which two helicopters collided over southern Afghanistan, killed four Marines.

But it is roadside bombs -- commonly referred to as IEDs, short for improvised explosive devices -- that have caused the majority of U.S. fatalities in Afghanistan in recent months. Last month, Defense Secretary Robert Gates approved a deployment of up to 3,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan to deal with the growing threat from roadside bombs.

Such attacks have been on a steady rise since February, and account for 70 percent of U.S. casualties in Afghanistan this year, according to U.S. military statistics.

Compared with just two years ago, the number of American troops killed by roadside bombs is up 400 percent.

"That's the number one threat," Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in July about IEDs in Afghanistan. Eighty-two deadly attacks occurred in June -- almost double the number from May -- and 105 in July, according to the latest U.S. military statistics.

Maj. Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, commander of U.S. troops in eastern Afghanistan, said he has noticed an "increasing sophistication" in the types of IEDs used.

"We're seeing some of the tactics, techniques and procedures that were used in Iraq, and [were] common there, migrate, obviously, here," Scaparrotti said in a recent briefing on operations in his area of command.

CNN Pentagon producer Mike Mount in Washington contributed to this report.

Source: 8 U.S. soldiers killed in Afghanistan - CNN.com
 
7 dead in attack on UN in Kabul
Updated at: 0955 PST, Wednesday, October 28, 2009


KABUL: Gunmen attacked a guest house used by U.N. staff in the Afghan capital of Kabul early Wednesday, killing at least seven people including three U.N. staff, officials said.

A Taliban spokesman claimed responsibility, saying it was meant as an assault on the upcoming presidential election. Heavy gunfire reverberated through the streets shortly after dawn and a large plume of smoke rose over the city following the attack in the Shar-e-Naw district. Kabul police chief Abdul Rahman said seven people were killed, including some attackers.

U.N. spokesman Adrian Edwards confirmed that three U.N. staff was among the dead and one was seriously wounded. He said 20 U.N. staff were known to be registered there but he was unsure whether all were there at the time of the attack.

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the attack in a telephone call to foreign news agency, saying three militants with suicide vests, grenades and machine guns carried out the assault.

7 dead in attack on UN in Kabul
 
they have got permannat presence in 72%? hope they know what 72% is.
 

Back
Top Bottom