Zaid hamid's shocking tweets

[Khafee]

Then why is he 'protected' by the powers? Media is against him, Politicians are against him, Mullahs are against him, then why the protection? Who is protecting him despite being what he's accused of?

I can categorically tell you - its NOT the deep state.

The rest, you are smart enough to figure out yourself.

 

[Shane]

Here is Zaid Zaman Hamid refuting that he never supported Yousuf Kazzab but caught in a fix:

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Be ware the fitna that is Zaid Zaman Hamid.

I have researched the guy throughly and with enough proof to safely and 100% claim that he is nothing but Fitna.

@Verve and @Umair Nawaz it is not that Zaid Hamid was right or wrong about Hindu genocide against Muslims or whatever Nationalistic ideologies he clings on to in order to fool the general public but Zaid Hamid himself.

The guy is a certified Kazib fitna who used to be self proclaimed (NaoZuBillah) SAHABI of another Kazib false Prophethood claimant. He never repented nor ever called his leader Kazib despite the unanimity of Ulema-e-KhatmeNabowat against the Kazib.

Whatever just cause this Filth Zaid Zaman Hamid touches shall not change his devious past nor fitna beliefs that he keeps disclosing to his inner circle of confidants who have exposed him since and over the years.

Kakay! is there any proof of that? because i have also thoroughly researched him since 2007 and have found nothing........

That Hamid Mir story is what yr talking abt, and we all know who hamid mir is and whom he works for.

He brought those ulema and rallied them behind him.

 

[Verve]

Fatwa Fobia – Zaid Hamid's Historic Article In Defense Of His False Prophet



Although some of the younger generation might have got confused by the sudden U-turn in Zaid Hamid’s stand – who previously was claiming that he had no relationship with Yusuf Kazab, and have now suddenly came out defending the False Prophet.

But the people in the know, are certainly not confused. Zaid Hamid was one of the most aggressive defenders of his False Prophet, throughout the trial of Yusuf Kazab. He was present in all the court hearings, took letters from one place to other asking people to withdraw the case, tried to threaten and blackmail the people involved in the case against Yusuf Kazab. Even after Yusuf was sentenced to death by hanging, Zaid Hamid didnt rested and wrote a splendid piece of defense in favor of his False Prophet in DAILY DAWN. The article was published on 13th Aug 2000. Zaid Hamid himself re-published it on Chowk. The article is being re-published here:

FATWA-FOBIA

There are a lot of allegedly moderates pakistanis on the chowk, who believe in human rights, who have woRn out their fingers posting about kashmir, the jinnah speach, the tolerant islam in pakistan, the 2% extremists. In supporting the killing of kashmir in the guise of human rights, selfdetermination etc. they are in tune with the mullahs, who prefer the word jihad.

In the following story, if the alleged moderates criticise the blasphemy laws they will be in conflict with the mullah. No, the moderates cannot afford to do that because of the fatwafobia. The human rights blah blah does not apply to pakistani nationals.

Convicted for blasphemy

A kind, benevolent and honourable Muslim Sufi of a small order has been sentenced to death on blasphemy charges by a court in Lahore. I am an eyewitness to what happened in the court and how the prosecution murdered justice, human dignity, Islamic and contemporary law and all norms of humanity in the name of Islam. Mohammad Yusuf Ali is a staunch Muslim and a scholar of the Holy Quran. He has rendered meritorious services to Islam, Pakistan and humanity in his career. It was only a difference of interpretation which was exploited by extremist mullahs and some Urdu newspapers. Yusuf Ali had already spent two years in jail and now he has been convicted.

I was present in the courtroom to assist the defence lawyers. It was barred to the outside world. I am witness to what happened inside and how he has been convicted. The prosecution had based their case on four items: audio cassette of Juma Khutba, video cassettes of Juma Khutba, Yousuf Ali`s purported diary, and one Pir and his few followers, who claimed that he had claimed to be “Muhammad“ in front of them many years ago!

There was nothing objectionable in the cassettes, and even according to Qanoon-i-Shahadat, they were inadmissible, as the one who had made these was not known. They were highly edited, doctored and manipulated.

The diary was not of Yusuf Ali`s at all, and even the prosecution admitted that they were not sure of its origin. It had no name, no handwriting match, no owner. It was simply alleged on Yusuf Ali and was torn to shreds in its originality and credibility.

The Pir and his followers were again torn to shreds, as none of them was the complainant. They never reported the alleged blasphemy to the police or any other authority, which supposedly happened many years ago. Their credibility did not exist at all in terms of contradictions in cross examinations.

One of them was on bail on fraud charges. The complainant had all the info on hearsay. He had never met the accused in his life. All his info was through Urdu newspapers. He accused Yusuf Ali of adultery, but even in the FIR, the relevant section was not mentioned for lack of evidence, making the complainant liable to “Qazaf“. His testimony was not admissible at all.

Yusuf Ali had categorically, even before the registration of the FIR, made it clear through paid ads that he had not claimed to be a prophet and he was a staunch Muslim. Top religious scholars like Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi had declared him a true Muslim and asked the charges to be dropped. According to all legal and Shariat requirements he had proved himself to be a true Muslim. Still the prosecution insisted that he called himself a prophet. How can anyone be the judge of someone`s faith? The prosecution lawyers went so overboard that even the judge had to stop them from committing blasphemy in trying to prove Yusuf Ali wrong. Even though Yusuf Ali was on bail, he was arrested one day earlier against all rules, laws and norms. It is extraordinary how the bail given by a High Court was cancelled by the Sessions Court and the accused was arrested.

The whole trial was in camera and the media was not allowed in to hear Yusuf Ali`s explanations, his speeches and comments. The media was also barred from seeing the hopelessness of the prosecution witnesses and their lawyers.

It was on this quality of evidence that a great living sufi has been condemned to death on so many counts that we have lost count.

Now Yusuf Ali is in the line for gallows. Will we wait and let the evil win or raise our voices for our own survival?

Z.Z. HAMID

Rawalpindi

This article has been published as part of our on-going effort to unearth all evidences, past and present against this believer and defender of False Prophet Yusuf Kazab.

Update: The Chowk article has now been removed by Zaid Hamid but the original letter in Daily DAWN can be viewed here Convicted for Blasphemy, Zaid Hamid’s Article In Daily DAWN 13 Aug 2000 [Original Scan]

Did ZH ever declare Kazzab to be a prophet?

This letter is about the court proceedings and application of law.

Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi

Did he get done for blasphemy as well for calling Kazzab a true Muslim?

Having bias is one thing but a guy who never claimed Kazzab to be prophet and then his questioning the legal proceedings somehow equates to declaring Kazzab as prophet. How does that logic work?

Kazzab may have declared himself to be a prophet but if ZH didn't believe that to be the case and neither did he ever declare as such then logically and rationally he can't be accused for it.

If I didn't make a statement in front of you and you also didn't think I would make such a statement, would you believe the others or would you try to defend me? Even if I tell you repeatedly that I didn't make that statement?

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Here is Zaid Zaman Hamid refuting that he never supported Yousuf Kazzab but caught in a fix:

read his books ''from indus to oxus; memoirs'' he has answered and told his side of story in it.

 

[Verve]

Here is Zaid Zaman Hamid refuting that he never supported Yousuf Kazzab but caught in a fix:

Please stop twisting.

Question was 'are you Ajmal Kazzab's pero-kaar'?

Please enlighten us with the meaning of pero-kaar'!?

 

[Armchair]

Did ZH ever declare Kazzab to be a prophet?

This letter is about the court proceedings and application of law.



Did he get done for blasphemy as well for calling Kazzab a true Muslim?

Having bias is one thing but a guy who never claimed Kazzab to be prophet and then his questioning the legal proceedings somehow equates to declaring Kazzab as prophet. How does that logic work?

Kazzab may have declared himself to be a prophet but if ZH didn't believe that to be the case and neither did he ever declare as such then logically and rationally he can't be accused for it.

If I didn't make a statement in front of you and you also didn't think I would make such a statement, would you believe the others or would you try to defend me? Even if I tell you repeatedly that I didn't make that statement?

Exactly. I think ZH has been set up a number of times. By whom? that is the important question, not these fake and half-baked "accusations".

 

[Shane]

Here is Zaid Zaman Hamid back to defending his beloved false prophethood claiment Yousuf Kazab in interview with Syed qutub:

Continued...

Zaid Zaman Hamid continues to dodge his interviewer but does not call the false Prophethood claiment as Kazab...

 

[Khafee]

One reason he got exposed to "deep state" was his funding i.e. where it was coming from.

@Maarkhoor @Shane @Mangus Ortus Novem @zulu @H!TchHiker @ali_raza

 

[H!TchHiker]

One reason he got exposed to "deep state" was his funding i.e. where it was coming from.

@Maarkhoor @Shane @Mangus Ortus Novem @zulu @H!TchHiker @ali_raza

Where he used to visit our dearly neighbor...meeting with there president .......

 

[Verve]

Here is Zaid Zaman Hamid back to defending his beloved false prophethood claiment Yousuf Kazab in interview with Syed qutub:

Continued...

Zaid Zaman Hamid continues to dodge his interviewer but does not call the false Prophethood claiment as Kazab...

Sorry bro، this line is very poor from you.

His stance is clear as it can be.

1. If it wasn't said to him or in his presence, he can only give his opinion on that matter but not declare another kafar. And that's exactly what Islam teaches us. We can't call anyone kafar despite another person taking an oath on Quran, because we are not witness to it.

2. Legal and Islamic formalities were not followed. Now you study the case yourself and then YOU swear on Quran that all Islamic and legal formalities were adhered to in declaring him a kafar. Can you do that?

ZH stance is logical and as per Islamic values and principles. Argue why his position is otherwise, in the light of Islam. Emotions and biases aside, if that's remotely possible.

 

[Shane]

Sorry bro، this line is very poor from you.

His stance is clear as it can be.

1. If it wasn't said to him or in his presence, he can only give his opinion on that matter but not declare another kafar. And that's exactly what Islam teaches us. We can't call anyone kafar despite another person taking an oath on Quran, because we are not witness to it.

2. Legal and Islamic formalities were not followed. Now you study the case yourself and then YOU swear on Quran that all Islamic and legal formalities were adhered to in declaring him a kafar. Can you do that?

ZH stance is logical and as per Islamic values and principles. Argue why his position is otherwise, in the light of Islam. Emotions and biases aside, if that's remotely possible.

All he needed to do was to send Laanath on Yousuf Kazab. He did not.

He tried to defend Yousuf Kazab.

He tried to convince people in private that Yousuf Kazab was innocent.

His stance is nothing but play dodging game with youth of Pakistan.

How can anyone accept being called a SAHABI of RasulAllah after his departure from this world... in any day and age let alone the contemporary age ...when the claimant has claimed to be reincarnation NaozuBillah then it becomes a Fitna and Zaid Zaman Hamid is nothing but a decietful Fitna.

 

[Verve]

All he needed to do was to send Laanath on Yousuf Kazab. He did not.

He tried to defend Yousuf Kazab.

He tried to convince people in private that Yousuf Kazab was innocent.

His stance is nothing but play dodging game with youth of Pakistan.

How can anyone accept being called a SAHABI of RasulAllah after his departure from this world... in any day and age let alone the contemporary age ...when the claimant has claimed to be reincarnation NaozuBillah then it becomes a Fitna and Zaid Zaman Hamid is nothing but a decietful Fitna.

He did say that if he said that then 'kufar me zimray main atta hai'. Maybe you should listen again.

Also please take an oath on Quran that Kafar declaration and death sentence was all according to Islamic and legal formalities. But you won't take such an oath yourself because you fear the consequences of being wrong.

You can't force your view on another. His stance is logical irrespective of you expect him to do or say.

 

[Shane]

Listen to the Laanath on his face Kazab Yousuf introducing his exalted SAHABI NaozuBillah, second of which is Syed Zaid Zaman Hamid himself.

The first NaozuBillah Sahabi narrates famous Iqbal verse about Sajda and then Congratulates the audiance that the deserved of that sajda is among us NAOZUBILLAH...REINCARNATION FILTH GALORE...then Zaid Hamid is introduced as second of his exalted SAHABI NAOZUBILLAH....

Just this audio alone gives enough pointers towards the gangs shenanigans in the name of religion...but there is plenty more available still on the internet for anyone looking to research the issue.

There are still living witnesses of Yousuf Kazab's false Prophethood claims which he made even in front of Syed Qutub as he himself testifies in earlier posted vids.

He did say that if he said that then 'kufar me zimray main atta hai'. Maybe you should listen again.

Also please take an oath on Quran that Kafar declaration and death sentence was all according to Islamic and legal formalities. But you won't take such an oath yourself because you fear the consequences of being wrong.

You can't force your view on another. His stance is logical irrespective of you expect him to do or say.

Alhamdulillah Here is my solemn oath dear:

I hereby declare with Allah Subhan Taala as my witness that I believe Yousuf Kazab is making the most henious transgressions in his audio introducing Zaid Zaman Hamid and others as his false Sahabi and that Yousuf was a false Prophethood Claiment and the most deplorable human being ever to have lived.

 

[Verve]

Alhamdulillah Here is my solemn oath dear:

I hereby declare with Allah Subhan Taala as my witness that I believe Yousuf Kazab is making the most henious transgressions in his audio introducing Zaid Zaman Hamid and others as his false Sahabi and that Yousuf was a false Prophethood Claiment and the most deplorable human being ever to have lived.

I've listed to this twice now. 6:29 onwards he DID NOT introduce ZH as HIS 'sahabi and wali'.

Please give exact time where he said 'mera sahabi' ...

his exalted SAHABI