Zaid Hamid on Ghazwa e Hind a full interview

[B+ Dracula]

MM_Haider, Your Post is Superb and you just steal my words...Whcih seemz to me ur Knowlege is sufficient or your keen student of these future prophecies
Zarvan on the other hand answers us Well , His arguments also seemz to me WONDERFUL
......I've Some Objections or in softer words I've some Questions..
1. Saha-e-sitta is most reliable books of Ahadees, and Bukharai/Muslims are on top of it, Why.....bcoz their rule on Accepting Hadees Critaria is Strict, Why we're unable to find those famous "Ghazwa" hadees in Bukhari/Muslim, you know meaning of Ghazwa?? High profile World...u know that

2. If we pakistanis wont fall in the definition of "Khorasaanis" ..then i think its suicidal to hve battle with India, offcource india is 7 times big power...which means simply "A Suicide Mission"

3. Doctor Israr, famous muslim scholar(now died) tends to interpret that ,there is no more Ghazwa-e hind bcoz its done by Muhammad bin Qasim, Which means that ...You're at your OWN??

4. Indian King will be presented to King of Jerosulem?? ....Jerosulem is capital of Israel, So which means to me is that first we've battle with Israel, then India???? ......CONFUSED...

 

[Victory]

MM_Haider, Your Post is Superb and you just steal my words...Whcih seemz to me ur Knowlege is sufficient or your keen student of these future prophecies
Zarvan on the other hand answers us Well , His arguments also seemz to me WONDERFUL
......I've Some Objections or in softer words I've some Questions..
1. Saha-e-sitta is most reliable books of Ahadees, and Bukharai/Muslims are on top of it, Why.....bcoz their rule on Accepting Hadees Critaria is Strict, Why we're unable to find those famous "Ghazwa" hadees in Bukhari/Muslim, you know meaning of Ghazwa?? High profile World...u know that

2. If we pakistanis wont fall in the definition of "Khorasaanis" ..then i think its suicidal to hve battle with India, offcource india is 7 times big power...which means simply "A Suicide Mission"

3. Doctor Israr, famous muslim scholar(now died) tends to interpret that ,there is no more Ghazwa-e hind bcoz its done by Muhammad bin Qasim, Which means that ...You're at your OWN??

4. Indian King will be presented to King of Jerosulem?? ....Jerosulem is capital of Israel, So which means to me is that first we've battle with Israel, then India???? ......CONFUSED...

Dude dont fall for this bs , zarvan is radicalized maulavi who has plans to cross LoC

 

[B+ Dracula]

I dont want WAR.....meri abi shaddi bhi nai hoiiii.
I want to see all India...Historic Places / Street Food = Dahi bhaly, Gol Gappy
.Me Comming India as Traveller .......

 

[danger007]

Mr GOD always helps those with Islam he tests them with troubles but final victory is always those who follow ALLAH and his RASOOL SAW and your country will be turned into history really soon don't you worry

im not sure about islam Allah. . I follow Christianity. . which tells be good , do good.. so why would Allah help your country? are you sure you guys doing good? innocent? fallowing islam perfectly? I don't know ... but first save your country from self destruction mode..

 

[Zarvan]

MM_Haider, Your Post is Superb and you just steal my words...Whcih seemz to me ur Knowlege is sufficient or your keen student of these future prophecies
Zarvan on the other hand answers us Well , His arguments also seemz to me WONDERFUL
......I've Some Objections or in softer words I've some Questions..
1. Saha-e-sitta is most reliable books of Ahadees, and Bukharai/Muslims are on top of it, Why.....bcoz their rule on Accepting Hadees Critaria is Strict, Why we're unable to find those famous "Ghazwa" hadees in Bukhari/Muslim, you know meaning of Ghazwa?? High profile World...u know that

2. If we pakistanis wont fall in the definition of "Khorasaanis" ..then i think its suicidal to hve battle with India, offcource india is 7 times big power...which means simply "A Suicide Mission"

3. Doctor Israr, famous muslim scholar(now died) tends to interpret that ,there is no more Ghazwa-e hind bcoz its done by Muhammad bin Qasim, Which means that ...You're at your OWN??

4. Indian King will be presented to King of Jerosulem?? ....Jerosulem is capital of Israel, So which means to me is that first we've battle with Israel, then India???? ......CONFUSED...

Mr if a Hadees is not in Sahih sitta that doesn't mean its not reliable Mr in fact their are Many many Sahih Hadees which are no in Sahih Sitta and Mr when ever Muslims have won war in almost all wars they were far less than the enemy and he is one scholar and Hadees clearly points out the Ghazwa which is referred has not taken place because after than Ghazwa almost after few days HAZRAT ESA AS will emerge no first India will be taken and than Israel and their are hundreds of scholars who have told about this ghazwa and they agree its not what Muhammad bin Qasim did

MM_Haider, Your Post is Superb and you just steal my words...Whcih seemz to me ur Knowlege is sufficient or your keen student of these future prophecies
Zarvan on the other hand answers us Well , His arguments also seemz to me WONDERFUL
......I've Some Objections or in softer words I've some Questions..
1. Saha-e-sitta is most reliable books of Ahadees, and Bukharai/Muslims are on top of it, Why.....bcoz their rule on Accepting Hadees Critaria is Strict, Why we're unable to find those famous "Ghazwa" hadees in Bukhari/Muslim, you know meaning of Ghazwa?? High profile World...u know that

2. If we pakistanis wont fall in the definition of "Khorasaanis" ..then i think its suicidal to hve battle with India, offcource india is 7 times big power...which means simply "A Suicide Mission"

3. Doctor Israr, famous muslim scholar(now died) tends to interpret that ,there is no more Ghazwa-e hind bcoz its done by Muhammad bin Qasim, Which means that ...You're at your OWN??

4. Indian King will be presented to King of Jerosulem?? ....Jerosulem is capital of Israel, So which means to me is that first we've battle with Israel, then India???? ......CONFUSED...

Are they authentic ?
The writer of the original article has given a very good set of questions that challenge the authenticity of these Ahadith. And if answer of these questions goes against the Ahadith, we can safely declare Ahadith of Ghazwatulhind as false or fabricated. So let’s explore them one by one.

Just a brief look at these will make it clear that none of these five ahadees are found in Sihah-e-Sitta. Two of these appear to be in the collections of ahadees by Imam Nisai but not in Sunan an-Nisai al Sughra, the book considered to be among the Sihah-e-Sitta, the six books considered most reliable by main-stream Muslims.

Factually wrong: Imam Nisai has narrated this Hadees in both of his books; ‘As Sunan al Sughra (also known as Al Mujtaba) as well as in ‘As Sunan Al Kubra. This is exactly the same book in which writer suggests it does not exist but the fact is that it is there in the same book. Would you like to see that?

Learning Aspect: Please browse Sunan-Nasai available online or in any public/Islamic library. Sunan-Nasai is available at Scribed.com,Ekabakti.com (you can also download that from the links given at the end of this article) and there will be 1000s of online reading resources which you can try. I encourage you to visit any nearest library and find Ahadith of Ghazwatulhind yourself. Ahadith of Ghazwatulhind exist at:

• Sunan-Nasai (Al Sughra/ Al Mujtaba) Vol. 3/6
  • Chapter No. 26 – KitabulJihad
    • Sub Chapter No. 41 - Ghazwatulhind
      • Hadith No. 3173 (By Hazrat Abu Hurraira)
      • Hadith No. 3174 (By Hazrat Abu Hurraira)
      • Hadith No. 3175 (By Hazrat Soban)

Note: There are two Hadith narrated by Abu Hurraira and one by Hazrat Soban. Somtimes two Ahadith of Abu Hurraira are considered as one Hadith and therefore three Ahadith of Sunan-Nasai are sometimes described as two Ahadith.

The others are not even found in the reliable collections of respected muhadiseen.

Factually Wrong: Immam Nasai is one of the most credible and respectable Mohadis. To establish his credibility further, Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal, (Sheikh Ul Islam) narrated this Hadees in ‘Masnad’. And ImmamIbn-e-Kaseer (the author of Tafseer ibn-e-Khatir) mentions this Hadees with his reference in his book ‘Al-Badaya Wa Nahaya’.

Also it is important to note that in the list of books called Sahi Sita (6 credible books of Hadith), Sunan-Nasai is accepted third most credible book after Sahi Bukhari and Sahi Muslim.

Note that Imam Nisai died in 915. The years of death of other respected muhadiseen to whom Sihah-e-Sittaare attributed to: Imam Bukhari in 870, Imam Muslim in 875,Abu Daud in 888, al-Tirmizi in 892,Imam Malik in 796, Ibn Maja in 886. All of them died before Imam Nisai. It does not make much sense that we have theseahadees being narrated through Imam Nisai but not through any of the other respected muhadiseen who lived before him.

Learning Aspect: There are thousands of Ahadith which are narrated by Immam Nasai and not all of them exist in Sahi Bukhari or Sahi Mulims or other books of Ahadith. Also Sahi Bukhari has narrated hundreds of Ahadith which are not listed on other books. To judge the credibility of a Hadith, this is not a criteria to see if it exists in other books too but there are parameters and defined procedures to evaluate whether given Hadith is credible or not-credible. [Learn what makes a Hadith Sahi, Hasan or Zaeef]

They are narrated through a single chain. Reported only once through one companion of the Prophet.

Factually Wrong: Hadith has been quoted by multiple narrators with independent chain of references.

Learning Aspect: Ahadith mentioned in Sunan-Nasai Al Sughra quotes it with reference to “Hazrat Soban” and “Hazrat Abu Hurraira” independently. There are 3 unique and credible chain of narration for the 3 Ahadith mentioned in Sunan-Nasai.

It is also important to learn that there exist more than 14 “Ravis”who have quoted the same Hadith with “slight changes” but because of weaker chain of narrations, those Hadith are not given their due significance. Regarding Ahadith of Sunan-Nasai, there are more than 16 witnesses of one Hadith alone. So there aremultiple, independent and credible narrators who quote these Adhadith in various times all being independent of each other in various books.

Considering the reward for participating in this war and the importance of it, as these Ahadees tell, they should have been narrated by more companions of the Prophet and should have been there in more books ofAhadees.

First: Hadith of Ghazwatulhind are not “the” most important Hadith as it is about future events instead of belief or practices which constitute Fiqa (the Islamic Law).

Second: there are already multiple witnesses to the Hadith and Multiple and Independent Muhadiseen have narrated it.

Third: there are extremely important Ahadith which were narrated by Hazrat Ayesha Sadiqa and Hazrat Ans bin Malik alone as they were among few companions of Prophet Mohammad PBUH who stayed close to him at times when others were not. This has never been a pattern of the life of Prophet Mohammad PBUH that the most important Hadith would be told before many Sahaba (R) and least important ones would be told before one, two or few companions.
It is very important to note that none of these are found in any of the collections of ahadees which theShia Muslims consider authentic. This raises the question if they were invented by the Ummayads/Abbasids considering their expansionist designs? This is also to be noted that Ummayads did reach Sindh, a part of Hind back then.

Learning Aspect: Shia Muslims do not rely on source of Ahadith outside Silsila of Ahle-e-Bait. That’s why Ahadith of Ghazwatulhind is not the only Hadith but there thousands of Ahadith in Sunni Muslim’s books but not in Shia Mulims’s books. For more learning:Wikipedia: Shia Muslims books of Ahadith.
One must also note the fact that we don’t have any history report telling us about the use of theseahadees in the past by Muslim rulers or conquerors, even those who did invade India or waged a war on it. If they were respected and authentic ahadees, we should have such history reports.

Factually Wrong: Muslims in the past made several military expeditions in the light of these Ahadith. The commentary by Ibn-e-Kathir (written around 1370 AD, some 700 years ago) on that “Ghazwa-e-Hind” Hadith is worth reading and he interpreted that Hadith and clearly written that all those Muslim rules who launched expedition on Hind were Jihad. He included Mohammad Bin Qasim and Mahmood Bin Subugtagin [Mehmood Ghaznavi] and many other Turk Kings as well.
After understanding various aspects about Ahadith of Ghazwatulhind, we can establish

• Ahadith of Ghazwatulhind hasn’t been discovered recently and Muslims know them since the time of Holy Prophet PBUH.
• Ahadith of Ghazwatulhind are Authentic and found in Sunan-Nasai Al Sughra, one of the 6 credible books of Ahadith.
• These Ahadith have multiple narrators and Independent Silsila of Naration.
• Muslims in the past knew about these Ahadith, referenced them and used them in their books.
• There has been multiple expeditions against Hind by Muslims in the past on the basis of Ahadith of Ghazwatulhind.

In the “What if they are authentic ?” section, the writer has provided testaments of Ulema who believe Ahadees to be true. The only difference of opinion they have is that in their opinion, the Ahadith have came true already. If these Hadith were non-credible, the Ulema must have rejected them the first place, but rather they gave their opinion about the fulfillment and believed these Ahadith have already came true.

The Ulema who has given this verdict include:

• Maulana Abdul Hamid Numani, a leading figure of the Jamiat ul-Ulema-i Hind.
• Mufti Sajid Qasmi, who teaches at the Dar ul-Uloom Deoband.

Are these Ahadith fulfilled already?
Now let’s look at all the Ahadith of GhazwatulHind once again and try to understand if they have been fulfilled already.

In addition to 2 Ahadith of Sunan-Nasai, there exist 3 more Ahadith and one of them says
“A King of Jerusalem (Bait-ul-Muqaddas) would make a troop move forward towards Hindustan. The Warriors destroy the land of Hind; would possess its treasures, then King would use those treasures for the décor of Jerusalem. That troop would bring the Indian kings in front of King(of Jerusalem). His Warriors by King’s order would conquer all the area between East & West. And would stay in Hindustan till the issue of Dajjal”.

Reference: Naeem bin Hammad(R) Ustaaz Imam Bukhari(R) narrate this Hadees in his book ‘Al-Fitan’. In it, the name of the quoter is not mentioned who related it to Hazrat Kaab(R.A.). But some Arabic words are being used, so this would be considered intersected. Those wordings are: (Almuhkamubnu Naafi-in Amman Haddasahu An Kaabin).

In the last line, the Hadith says “And would stay in Hindustan till the issue of Dajjal”. The Dajjal didn’t arrive after the expeditions on Hind in the past. That means the battle which is being referred to hasn’t happened yet.

Question: Does it mean Muslims would arrive in Hind as conquerors and thereafter would stay there centuries after centuries until Dajjal would appear? Is Hadith referring to past expeditions and settled Muslims of Hind of today?

Answer: According to Hadith, the Muslims will capture the Kind of Hind and present him before King of Jerusalem. In the past conquests over Hind, such incident did not happen. So that gives us an indication that past campaigns against Hind were not GhazwatulHind. Following Hadith makes this aspect further clear which says:
“Some people of My Ummah will fight with Hindustan, Allah would grant them with success, even they would find the Indian kings being trapped in fetters. Allah would forgive those Warriors. When they would move towards Syria, then would find Isa Ibn-e-Maryam(A.S.) over there”

Reference: Naeem bin Hammad did narrate this Hadees in ‘Al Fitan’.

Thus Hadith is reffering to the warriors who would conquer Hind and when they would move back, they would find Isa Ibn-e-Maryam (A.S) in Syria. Thus same army would Join Hazrat Isa (R.A) who would conquer Hind and this event never took place in the past battles.

It is also important to note that the events of Dajjal, the Immam Mehdi and Prophet Isa (A.S) are connected and will happen within a short period of time, one after the other. There is good deal of detail available on this the subject at Shia.org (which discusses Shia and Sunni point of view) and a Sunni Fatwa which explains and connects these Ahadith without leaving a shadow of doubt whether the time of Ghazwatulhind was in the past or lies ahead of us. However if we only consider Ahadith of Sunan-Nasai, we wouldn’t be able to derive any conclusion.

Some contradictions and flaws found in the original article.

• The writer gives wrong information, claiming Ahadith of GhazwatuHind do not exist in Sunan-Nasai al Sughra but later in the references of First Hadith, Mentions the references to Sunan-Nasai AlMujtaba which is the same Sunan-Nasai Al Sughra and Al Mujtaba is its second name. [Wiki Reference] It is sad to know that the writer does not know names of books of Ahadith.
• The writer himself quotes one of the Hadith that has broken chain of command and insist the event has already taken place, while ignoring 2 similar Ahaidth (similar because they also lie outside Sunan-Nasai/Sunan-Nasai Al Sughra/Sunan-Nasai Al Mujtaba) that give answer to his own question.
• After acknowledging the Ahaidth of Ghazwatulhind do not exist in the book accepted by Shia Alims, he has presented Fatwa by a Shia Alim who cannot testify in any case.
• In the Section “Opinions of Scholars”, the given references who speak against are weak and not compareable to Jimeat-Ulema-i-Hind or Dar-ul-Aloom Deoband who are in the favor and who represent millions of Muslims.
• People with no religious background are considered adequate to comment on religious aspect while Alims and Mohadaseen are considered as non-credible.
• Representing “Al Mawarid Institute”, the ‘Editor’ has mentioned only 3 out of 6 books of Ahadith who he searched for reference for “Ghazwatulhind”. His searched books include Sahi Bukhari, Sahi Muslim and Moutha etc. It is essential that whoever gives Fatwa must do so after making complete research and exploring every possible authentic resource. But the “alim” made search through ’3 etc’ books. The ‘Editor’ did not mention name of Sunan Nasai altogether, thus an incomplete research cannot be accepted as basis of a Fatwa.
• Reference Article written by Khalid Zaheer ( Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences of University of Central Punjab) himself states that he has not made any study on the authenticity of these Ahadith.
• The writer claims Ahadith of GhazwatulHind to be in the “Collection o f Immam Nasai” withuot giving name of thatcollection and negates their existance in Sunan Nasai. However Ahadith of GhazwatulHind exist in Sunan-Nasai (both collections of Ahadith known as Al Kubra and Al Sughra/ Al Mujtaba).
• The over-all understanding of writer on the subject is weak and he has made claims without making research.

Since deen is a sensitive subject and not everybody who follows religion has capacity to make research, who-ever writes about religion must have adequate knowledge and research in hand before writing something. It is unfortunate that writer has been factually incorrect and used selective material to build his argument. I request all Muslims to make proper research before believing or accepting anything about religion.

May Allah help you find the right path and may all Muslims be on Sirat-e-Mustaqeem. Aamin.
@Anoushirvan Please bother to read the answer of those things said by Haider

 

[B+ Dracula]

@Zarvan you're posting same Article again & again, If you possess some percent of knowlege ,then you can deliver your Answer in Few Sentences....Unfortunately you're Photocopy of ZAID HAMID
Just Trumpeting the Un-authentic hadees here in Thread, to the indians who wont understand what you're posting,

LOGIC 1:
All muslim world are not Unified on hadees u mentioned, and interpretation varies Scholars to Scholars, So how a person like you (u seemz to me Teenager) is giving FATWA
LOGIC 2:
Your are just hiding your so called scholarly thinking by posting same column again & again...maybe u find that column somewhere in google, there are many bloggers of your mentality that given us deadlines after deadline....2006 is last date, then again in same blog 2007 is last date for Imam mahdi, then no Shame in same Blog they given date 2012- 2013 and 2015 is last date, After Hajj imam mahdi or someone else will come to lead the muslim world....
LOGIC 3:
you r unable to give answers of my 4 Objections.......Given above
LOGIC 4:
Your are supporting your arguments by Quoting old scholars books (Badaya wan nahaya, Fitan etc) are Reverent to us BUT cant be authentic...........The Source of All Authentic Hadees are SAHA-E-Sitta, not u mentioned above...ok (let it be clear)
If Molvi of my city writes a book on Hadees, then that book is considered respectable to us BUT not AUTHENTIC...OK

 

[Zarvan]

@Zarvan you're posting same Article again & again, If you possess some percent of knowlege ,then you can deliver your Answer in Few Sentences....Unfortunately you're Photocopy of ZAID HAMID
Just Trumpeting the Un-authentic hadees here in Thread, to the indians who wont understand what you're posting,

LOGIC 1:
All muslim world are not Unified on hadees u mentioned, and interpretation varies Scholars to Scholars, So how a person like you (u seemz to me Teenager) is giving FATWA
LOGIC 2:
Your are just hiding your so called scholarly thinking by posting same column again & again...maybe u find that column somewhere in google, there are many bloggers of your mentality that given us deadlines after deadline....2006 is last date, then again in same blog 2007 is last date for Imam mahdi, then no Shame in same Blog they given date 2012- 2013 and 2015 is last date, After Hajj imam mahdi or someone else will come to lead the muslim world....
LOGIC 3:
you r unable to give answers of my 4 Objections.......Given above
LOGIC 4:
Your are supporting your arguments by Quoting old scholars books (Badaya wan nahaya, Fitan etc) are Reverent to us BUT cant be authentic...........The Source of All Authentic Hadees are SAHA-E-Sitta, not u mentioned above...ok (let it be clear)
If Molvi of my city writes a book on Hadees, then that book is considered respectable to us BUT not AUTHENTIC...OK

Mr you are talking about one scholar their are several hundred scholars who believe in this Hadees and have told it several times and also that is going to happen because it is close to time of Hazrat ESA not Muhammad Bin Qasim did and those who know Hadees majority are unified Mr after Sahabas not many will get unified but when will war will take place they will know it O Mr your Logic 4 shows your level of Jahalat about Hadees Mr know Sir their are thousand more Sahih Hadees in other Books like Masnd e Ahmed Bin Hanbal Like Mastadrak e Imam Hakim Like Mutta of Imam Malik and few more first know about Hadees than come and talk

 

[he-man]

Mr you are talking about one scholar their are several hundred scholars who believe in this Hadees and have told it several times and also that is going to happen because it is close to time of Hazrat ESA not Muhammad Bin Qasim did and those who know Hadees majority are unified Mr after Sahabas not many will get unified but when will war will take place they will know it O Mr your Logic 4 shows your level of Jahalat about Hadees Mr know Sir their are thousand more Sahih Hadees in other Books like Masnd e Ahmed Bin Hanbal Like Mastadrak e Imam Hakim Like Mutta of Imam Malik and few more first know about Hadees than come and talk

 

[jatt+gutts]

yaar ek gall de samj nahee aundi eh allah saday he pichay kyo paya..assi kee rabb day mah maray ya. jehra kehra hades saday khilaf ya.. assi v rabb day banday ya ... Pakistani tah gallah edah karday jivay allah nu jaib vich paya vah tay allah onah de hee sunuga

 

[Zarvan]

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=169149599940408

 

[pursuit of happiness]

@Zarvan you're posting same Article again & again, If you possess some percent of knowlege ,then you can deliver your Answer in Few Sentences....Unfortunately you're Photocopy of ZAID HAMID
Just Trumpeting the Un-authentic hadees here in Thread, to the indians who wont understand what you're posting,

LOGIC 1:
All muslim world are not Unified on hadees u mentioned, and interpretation varies Scholars to Scholars, So how a person like you (u seemz to me Teenager) is giving FATWA
LOGIC 2:
Your are just hiding your so called scholarly thinking by posting same column again & again...maybe u find that column somewhere in google, there are many bloggers of your mentality that given us deadlines after deadline....2006 is last date, then again in same blog 2007 is last date for Imam mahdi, then no Shame in same Blog they given date 2012- 2013 and 2015 is last date, After Hajj imam mahdi or someone else will come to lead the muslim world....
LOGIC 3:
you r unable to give answers of my 4 Objections.......Given above
LOGIC 4:
Your are supporting your arguments by Quoting old scholars books (Badaya wan nahaya, Fitan etc) are Reverent to us BUT cant be authentic...........The Source of All Authentic Hadees are SAHA-E-Sitta, not u mentioned above...ok (let it be clear)
If Molvi of my city writes a book on Hadees, then that book is considered respectable to us BUT not AUTHENTIC...OK

--
dont try much..
logic and zarvan is inversely perpotion ..

 

[Soumitra]

OK let us for a moment agree that Ghaza-E-Hind is written in some Hadith. Is there a deadline for the same? If yes what is the deadline?

If there is no deadline is it given that who will do this great deed? If yes why hasnt he done it?

If Who or when is not given but many people believe in it then why havent they acted regarding it. This joker Zaid Hamid has been crying hoarse for so many years why hasnt he led the forces of Islam into India. You also have the nuclear bomb. Use that to invade India.

We are waiting for you @Zarvan

 

[pursuit of happiness]

OK let us for a moment agree that Ghaza-E-Hind is written in some Hadith. Is there a deadline for the same? If yes what is the deadline?

If there is no deadline is it given that who will do this great deed? If yes why hasnt he done it?

If Who or when is not given but many people believe in it then why havent they acted regarding it. This joker Zaid Hamid has been crying hoarse for so many years why hasnt he led the forces of Islam into India. You also have the nuclear bomb. Use that to invade India.

We are waiting for you @Zarvan

--
same guy said pak wil reach moon in 2 yr when patriotic technocrat govt forms in pak,,
he means make me PM i will take you all to ride ..

 

[B+ Dracula]

OK let us for a moment agree that Ghaza-E-Hind is written in some Hadith. Is there a deadline for the same? If yes what is the deadline?
If there is no deadline is it given that who will do this great deed? If yes why hasnt he done it?

above discussion deals with End of Times Hadees, and Interpretation of Hadees varies scholars to scholar in all over the world. After the death of Prophet Muhammad PBUH, Millions of fabricated Hadees invented to prove their side of arugments...to avoid dilemma in whole islamic world ""Critaria of True Hadees"" was Establish (what to accept wat to reject)...by numbers of profound scholars and they also shared their CRITARION (why they accepted those hadees), there are many reverent books written by many scholars but only 6 Books are considered AUTHENTIC in Sunni islam which comprise 80% of muslim world ..(right now)
LET ME GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE...
first authentic book is called "SAHI BUKHARI" and why it is Authentic bcoz author accepted 2 Sources of Hadees
Mr A: that man lives in (syria/kabul/mecca or else) but he was present there when Prophet PBUHnarrated about one particular Hadees
Mr B: father/grandfather of MrB was present there when Prophet PBUH narrated about the hadees
On that critaria he accepted 6500 Hadees in his book & rejected more than 500,000 Hadees
Later Century Scholars tends to accept Un-authentic hadees on the basis of "if they're not contrary to the basic foundation of Islam" ....that ACT is debatable among scholars
@Soumitra You basically hve no understanding of Authentic books so lots of people swindle you by quoting un-authantic source of narration.

 

[GURU DUTT]

all short dark evil banya hindu indian making fun of "masd e momin" & ruhani fighter of Islam & Ummah and the great scholar Sir zaid hamid