What's new

Zaid Hamid claims Chandrayaan 3 is fake CGI graphics

Zaid Hamid's IQ level initially led me to believe he was the result of inbreeding. After all, 70% of Muslims in India and Pakistan are the result of inbreeding.

Not 70% another exaggeration for likes hey zahid Hamid ? 😁

It’s same as south India where they go a bit further and uncle fucks niece


Of marriages in rural areas, 46·9% were consanguineous, and in urban areas, 29·1%. In more than 80% of the consanguineous marriages, the spouses were first cousins or more closely related.

led you to Believe, Who the fk are you ? A self-proclaimed scientist that talks out of thin air just like Zaid Hamid?
Arent you the same loser who claimed and then failed to provide even a single rebuttal that how Remotest Village of India has access to better healthcare and education than any modern Pakistani city ?

So what credibility do you have?
And what is the IQ level of Those Super Bhar,ins who eat and drink Gau muttar ? Are they result from fking cows that usually brahimns does in hiding ?

Yeah you got it in one
This slum dwelling street shitting product of rape ( did you know roughly 70% of Indians have been sexually abused at least once in their lifetimes ? British did a survey ) who peddles lies over and over to garner attention .😂🤣😂

And then calls out zahid Hamid for the same

Indians ... you couldn’t make them up lol

😁
 
Last edited:
Not 70% another exaggeration for likes hey zahid Hamid ? 😁

It’s same as south India where they go a bit further and uncle fucks niece


Of marriages in rural areas, 46·9% were consanguineous, and in urban areas, 29·1%. In more than 80% of the consanguineous marriages, the spouses were first cousins or more closely related.



Yeah you got it in one
This slum dwelling street shitting product of rape ( did you know roughly 70% of Indians have been sexually abused at least once in their lifetimes ? British did a survey ) who peddles lies over and over to garner attention .😂🤣😂

And then calls out zahid Hamid for the same

Indians ... you couldn’t make them up lol

😁
Jews marry cousins too. Never heard a Hindutva talk against them since they are Noble prize winners. Einstein was married to his cousin. Japanese culture allows cousin marriage as well.
 
Not 70% another exaggeration for likes hey zahid Hamid ? 😁

It’s same as south India where they go a bit further and uncle fucks niece


Of marriages in rural areas, 46·9% were consanguineous, and in urban areas, 29·1%. In more than 80% of the consanguineous marriages, the spouses were first cousins or more closely related.



Yeah you got it in one
This slum dwelling street shitting product of rape ( did you know roughly 70% of Indians have been sexually abused at least once in their lifetimes ? British did a survey ) who peddles lies over and over to garner attention .😂🤣😂

And then calls out zahid Hamid for the same

Indians ... you couldn’t make them up lol

😁
In Pakistan, the prevalence of inbreeding is remarkably high, exceeding 90%. However, a significant number of individuals within this population often do not acknowledge their inbred status. A survey conducted in Pakistan revealed that approximately 70% of marriages in the country involve unions between first cousins and step-siblings.
 
In Pakistan, the prevalence of inbreeding is remarkably high, exceeding 90%. However, a significant number of individuals within this population often do not acknowledge their inbred status. A survey conducted in Pakistan revealed that approximately 70% of marriages in the country involve unions between first cousins and step-siblings.
Article doesn't say Pakistanis prefer cousin marriage because of religion. Other factors are involved. But, for you, apparently, it is only about religion.

Islam permits cousin marriage, it does not say cousin marriage is preferable.
'Scientists have crunched the numbers and it turns out the risk that the cousins have a kid who inherits a genetic disease is 4-7%. For the general population, it’s 3-4%. ... So, as far as marrying your cousin is concerned, you shouldn’t make it a family tradition.'
 
Both Islamists and Muhajir neo-liberals are backwass. To suggest one of the other is false dillema.

As for Vedics being not like modern Brahmans and other religions/cults in India. It's correct. Archeology supports this claim.
depends on your understanding of how people cultures and everything else evolve.
if you are a fundamentalist that expects things to be stagnant, say from the 7th century, the funda and the ist disappear and you just become mental.

But more worrisome is teh inability to come out of the attempts to constrain / understand Vedas and Brahmins from the narrow framework of religions and cults you are used to. Doesn't work
 
Jews marry cousins too. Never heard a Hindutva talk against them since they are Noble prize winners. Einstein was married to his cousin. Japanese culture allows cousin marriage as well.
There is difference between cousins marriage and nana nani , chacha chachi , mama mami , fufa fufi , dada dadi , sas sasur , sister brother , khala khalu , you can marry all .
 
But more worrisome is teh inability to come out of the attempts to constrain / understand Vedas and Brahmins from the narrow framework of religions and cults you are used to. Doesn't work

The Vedic grave culture goes back to the Sintashta period. Even before our Y-chromsome came to Pakistan, they buried their dead.

They did not burn them. You can argue Vedic culture inspired Brahmanic religions, but to suggest they are derived from the Vedic religions is false.

you should learn some basic calculation skills from indians. Its gonna help you much more than being a grammar nazi

I already have! People there got no toilets but plenty of iphones, plane tickets, expensive cars, but not toilets. I already got pajeet calculation skills!

Advice of Zaid hamid urf lal topi wala balungda .

Dont forget to close down your rocket company suparco , it is a waste of money for a poor nation pakistan .

Indeed it's a waste of money, but I'm sure it costs less than sending rockets to the moon by the world's poorest country lol.


You're posting the original artcile in response to the refutation? Excellent.
 
Last edited:
There is difference between cousins marriage and nana nani , chacha chachi , mama mami , fufa fufi , dada dadi , sas sasur , sister brother , khala khalu , you can marry all .

Here comes brainwashed pagan with more lies .

In actual truth .

It is forbidden for you to marry: your mothers; your daughters; your sisters; your maternal aunts; your paternal aunts; nieces from the brother’s or sister’s side; your foster mothers who have suckled you, and your foster sisters; your mothers-in-law; the stepdaughters who are in your care from women with whom you have consummated marriage, but if you have not consummated your marriage to them then you are not to blame. Also forbidden to you in marriage are the wives of your biological sons and marrying two sisters at the same time. Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. Also forbidden are women who are already married, except what your right hands possess. These prohibited degrees of marriage are Allah’s commandment imposed on you. Whatever falls outside all the above-mentioned prohibitions is lawful for you to desire, using your wealth to become married men, not fornicators. Whichever of them you wish to enjoy in lawful marriage give them their marriage gift as a legal obligation; there is no blame on you, after fulfilling that legal obligation, in whatever you may mutually agree to do with the marriage gift. Allah has always been All-knowing, Wise” (Quran -An-Nisa: 3-24).
 
The Vedic grave culture goes back to the Sintashta period. Even before our Y-chromsome came to Pakistan, they buried their dead.

They did not burn them. You can argue Vedic culture inspired Brahmanic religions, but to suggest they are derived from the Vedic religions is false.
what has your view of age of Vedas, your understanding of Vedic burial / cremation practices etc have to do with current topic? There are many possible periodicities for these things and the evolution and changes depending upon sources you use. Each source uses a different set of assumptions and none of them can be considered authoritative. The actual Vedas themselves, without the confusions of translations say completely different periodicities across non-linear time.

Secondly, there is no such religion as Brahminc. WTH are you talking about?
 
As in Brahamnic religions. Because remember there is no "hinduism" as a religion. It's a made up concept.
there is no Brahminic religion either

You guys are limiting your thoughts and even imagination by very narrow structures such as religion. Vedas, and associated concepts are too broad and vast to be understood by such structural or even systemic closed-loop thinking.

When I say someone is not eligible to receive Vedic knowledge it is because they have not acquired the mental and spiritual equipment, not because I want to insult them. You simply can't get there.

A somewhat inaccurate but the closest analogy that I think you can understand is something like - you want to learn to count with your fingers but if you don't have fingers how are you going to do it?
 

Back
Top Bottom