What's new

Yogi Adityanath’s anti-Mughal stand has reasons. Akbar identified himself as a ghazi

Bless the Mughal Empire and Delhi Sultanate. Despite the wrong they did in their times, literally like every other empire... they left an Islamic footprint of Indo-Aryanic people as well.

You mean - Literally like every other islamic empire.

Even Naiz germany left their food print.

Foot prints is how we remember tyrants and despots who trample on our civilization.

Lmao, this is the dumbest thing I have read in a while... both the name change, and the builder.


Taj Mahal: The Illumined Tomb by WE Begley and ZA Desai has compiled an anthology of these sources, and it was from this book that we realised how well-documented the building of the mausoleum was. I use these translations to present my arguments that the Taj Mahal was built on the land where Raja Jai Singh had a mansion and that there is no mention of any religious building on that land.

These historians mention that though Raja Jai Singh wanted to give it for free for the noble purpose, the emperor was unwilling, and gave another mansion loftier than the one he had acquired in lieu thereof.

Two books give details and a translation of the royal "farman" giving four "havelis" in lieu of Raja Jai Singh’s haveli. Yes, the word mentioned is "haveli", or mansion.

Qazwini describes the tract of land on the southern side of Agra that had the qualities needed to be the final resting place of the one whose residence was paradise. Qazwini says it was formerly the word "khana", or house of Raja Jai Singh.


He also mentions that though the Raja was willing to give it for free, Shah Jahan gave him a lofty house in lieu of it.

Lahori also describes a tract of land south of the city as being suitable for the queen’s resting place, and uses the word "manzil" or mansion of Raja Jai Singh. He also mentions the fact that though Raja Jai Singh was willing to give it for free, Shah Jahan gave a lofty mansion from the crown lands in exchange.

Muhammad Salih Kanbo writes that the emperor acquired a "heaven-like tract of land (sarzamin e bihist-ain)" which was situated on the south side of Agra and belonged to Raja Man Singh. Once again, the word manzil is used.


I found details and translation of the "farman" giving orders for the exchange to Raja Jai Singh in two books. One is Mughal Documents by prof SAI Tirmizi and the other is Begley and Desai’s Taj Mahal: The Illumined Tomb.

While prof Tirmizi gives the bare details, Begley and Desai have translated the "farman" in its entirety and have given all the details of endorsements and scrutiny that were given on the back, which were necessary before it could be admitted in the royal office.

Though the mansion was gifted immediately after the decision to bury Mumtaz Mahal in Agra was taken in 1631, the exchange of the additional/replacement four "havelis" took two years to affect, as the royal "farman" is dated December 28, 1633.

A certified contemporary copy of the "farman" dated 26 Jumada II 1043 AH, sixth regnal year [corresponding to December 28, 1633], is available in the Kapad Dwara collection in Jaipur City palace. The word used in the "farman" too is "haveli" (mansion).

“Be it known through this glorious farman marked by happiness, which has received the honor of issuance and the dignity of proclamation, that the mansions (haveli) detailed in the endorsement, together with their dependencies, which belong to the august crown property, have been offered to that pride of peers and vassal of the monarch of Islam, Raja Jai Singh, and are hereby handed over and transferred to his ownership- in exchange of the mansion (haveli) formerly belonging to Raja Man Singh, which that pride of the grandees willingly and voluntarily donated for the mausoleum of that Queen of the ladies of the world ….. Mumtaz Mahal Begum.” [Translation Begley and Desai]


There are other royal "farmans" addressed to Raja Jai Singh which deal with sending of marble from Makrana mines which were part of Raja Jai Singh’s estates.



Here are more historical Facts,

 
Last edited:
.
Not interested in your limitations.

Then please go start a spaceship design company with knowledge derived from ancient 24,000-year-old vedic manuals. Since your thinking is not limited.

Tho mei kya karu ? job chod du ?

No, just come out of your delusions about the past and present of India.
 
.
Put your money where your mouth is. Demolish Taj Mahal and build a temple in its place. Or are you afraid white people may object? Prof Whitey McWhiteface of Whitechester University will condemn such an act, because whiteys understand that it doesn't matter wtf Akbar or Aurangzeb did centuries ago. Pillaging was all fun and games back then. Whites aren't hung up over it.

But Hindus are, right? Even though Hindus slaughtered Hindus, buddhists and other dharmics/abrahamics when necessary, and Aryans enslaved lower castes/darker Hindus as necessary, and railed venomously against Indus Valley Hindus, modern "secular loving" Hindus cannot get over the specific historical crimes of akbar and aurangzeb. The PTSD is perpetual with you people.

Cowardly white-worshippers like Yogi and @Nityam wouldn't dare do such things, even in Hindustan.

Sadly Taj Mahal is iconic so we we will have to put it to better use. But its true history needs to come out and IT WILL.

LOL at 'white people" and what they think. The same "White people." but a ban on Modi and Indians overwhelmingly voted him to power.

Indians will decide the fate of India and Indian heritages and you have NO say in and that is how it is going to remain for all times.

LOL at your Hindu atrocity literature. Go sell that snake oil in pakistan.
 
.
Sadly Taj Mahal is iconic so we we will have to put it to better use. But its true history needs to come out and IT WILL.

LOL at 'white people" and what they think. The same "White people." but a ban on Modi and Indians overwhelmingly voted him to power.

Indians will decide the fate of India and Indian heritages and you have NO say in and that is how it is going to remain for all times.

LOL at your Hindu atrocity literature. Go sell that snake oil in pakistan.
I bet you a bottle of mirinda India will cry and cry and cry about Taj Mahal but will never ever have the guts to demolish this monument to Mughal supremacy and absolute power over Hindustan. The only thing stopping you is white worship.
Maybe you can commission "Panipat 4" to present a Bollywood version of reality where modern descendants of the great Maratha empire can smash the TM? This will suffice for a nation that can't actually muster the courage and determination to rewrite history for real.
 
.
Then please go start a spaceship design company with knowledge derived from ancient 24,000-year-old vedic manuals. Since your thinking is not limited.

No, just come out of your delusions about the past and present of India.

LOL. Ye kya naya chutiyapa hai :lol:
I bet you a bottle of mirinda India will cry and cry and cry about Taj Mahal but will never ever have the guts to demolish this monument to Mughal supremacy and absolute power over Hindustan. The only thing stopping you is white worship.
Maybe you can commission "Panipat 4" to present a Bollywood version of reality where modern descendants of the great Maratha empire can smash the TM? This will suffice for a nation that can't actually muster the courage and determination to rewrite history for real.

What mughal supremacy ? Mughal documents PROVE that it was Haveli belonging to Raja Man sing and it was in that "mahal" the queen was buried.

SO the credit of building Taj "Mahal" goes to Raja Man singh, not to the Mughals :lol:
 
. . .
LOL. Ye kya naya chutiyapa hai :lol:


What mughal supremacy ? Mughal documents PROVE that it was Haveli belonging to Raja Man sing and it was in that "mahal" the queen was buried.

SO the credit of building Taj "Mahal" goes to Raja Man singh, not to the Mughals :lol:
Of course we thank Mr Singh, as well as countless Hindu labourers, for contractual services.

Ramesses thanked Hebrews likewise for Egypt's monuments...doesn't make them "The Hebrew Pyramids".

What a funny fellow you are.
 
.
If it was built as a Mahal and not as a Kabra then it is clear that the Hindus built it since it was on Raja Jai singh's land. :lol:



Feel free to PROVE me wrong.


What is "radical" Hindu ?
It was built by Mughals and on land of Mughals as for who built it then we all should be finding those workers with no hands maybe Jai Singh was one of them too..
 
.
Of course we thank Mr Singh, as well as countless Hindu labourers, for contractual services.

Ramesses thanked Hebrews likewise for Egypt's monuments...doesn't make them "The Hebrew Pyramids".

What a funny fellow you are.

Yeah, Because they are EGYPTIAN pyramids and INDIAN Monuments.

So I am not sure why YOU are thanking me :lol:

It was built by Mughals and on land of Mughals as for who built it then we all should be finding those workers with no hands maybe Jai Singh was one of them too..

Nope, it was built by Raja Man singh on HIS land which was later brought by the King in exchange for some other property. THIS as per Mughal documents.

Also no hands were cut. Its a urban legend.
Hindus who take articles like this seriously need deradicalisation programs.

I have heard China has some good one's. Can you ask them to give more details ?
 
. . .
Yeah, Because they are EGYPTIAN pyramids and INDIAN Monuments.

So I am not sure why YOU are thanking me :lol:

You're making my life as a troll needlessly difficult. Are you proud of Taj Mahal or not? I can't make you look like the well rounded moron that you are if you keep flip flopping like this. Then again, you don't actually need any help from me in this endeavour.
 
.
So the truth is out, even Akbar disliked Hindus.

Mughals civilization is foreign to India. I'm happy Indians are realizing it. Hindutva India needs to ban everything associated with Mughal culture.

Akbar was a savage who killed over 50000 Rajput civilians in Chittorgarh to try to impose Islam on the Hindus.
Change the name of taj mehal to ram mehal.
Even destroy it and make a tample out of it.
After all a mughal made this building.
demolish taj mahal nowwwwwwwwwww
If Indians have any little self respect left; they should destroy all signs of the Mughal empire, destroy all buildings of that era, they have a significant experience in demolishing (Read: Babri Mosque), the same should be done to everything else. And oh please start with Taj Mahal.


Firstly, Taj Mahal was built by a Hindus which was stole by a Muslim savage emperor to bury his wife.

Taj Mahal is not a symbol of Love but symbol of Islamic tyranny on the Hindus of India.

The solution to this issue is not destroying it. The solution is

  • We need to exhumed the grave and relocate it into a Muslim graveyard.
  • Cleanse and Purify (shuddhikaran) the whole place
  • Repurpose it


But alas we have sanghis ruling India and UP who will just pay lip service but take no concrete action.
 
Last edited:
.
They are at Galwan. If you remain patient, they may offer one when they reach Delhi

Can you ask them to hurry up ? How long will it take ? its been 6 months already.
You're making my life as a troll needlessly difficult. Are you proud of Taj Mahal or not? I can't make you look like the well rounded moron that you are if you keep flip flopping like this. Then again, you don't actually need any help from me in this endeavour.

Why are you so worried about my pride or lack of it for the Taj Mahal ?

Either way you have NO ROLE to play in this.

 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom