What's new

Yes, Australia is Getting New Submarines, But So is the United Kingdom

.
Dumb brown fanboys dont know anything, reality is the UK couldn't built the astute class subs and in the end had to beg the US to help. Without US help the sub would never have materialized.
 
. .
It's so funny when fanboys rush to say that the British are not a military power or that their aircraft carriers are bad or that their fleet is not good against the Chinese.

The British have one of the best fleets on the planet. They have some of the best-equipped ships and some of the most experienced soldiers and sailors.
 
.
keep dreaming

UK can deploy 2 carriers simultaneously one to counter Russia and one dead inside the South China Sea and none has enough guts to even come out and escort it out

not to mentioned the HMS QE has the largest 5th generation naval air wing in the world

no wonder neither China or Russia can send their carrier anywhere close to UK waters
they can always send some hyper sonic missiles!
 
.
Seriously,you guys that are mocking the Royal Navy,do you know what ships they have in their fleet? Have you checked the systems and weapons?

Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers are epic

QE class.jpg
Queen Elizabeth class.jpg



Type 45 Destroyers

Screenshot 2021-12-15 at 13-12-06 Type 45 destroyer - Wikipedia.png


Soon they will have Type 26 Frigates

Type-26 CITY CLASS B.jpg


The British have one of the best maritime traditions in history. You can't disregard that just like that! Come on!
 
.
thats because they are deployed

can’t hit under sea mountain if sitting in port like China

we call them pier queens
LOL Your excuse is very familiar. Do you learn it from India to mask your incompetency? Ship or aircraft crashed often becos of tough training? Are you high on drugs? :lol:
Seriously,you guys that are mocking the Royal Navy,do you know what ships they have in their fleet? Have you checked the systems and weapons?

Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers are epic

View attachment 801161View attachment 801162


Type 45 Destroyers

View attachment 801163

Soon they will have Type 26 Frigates

View attachment 801164

The British have one of the best maritime traditions in history. You can't disregard that just like that! Come on!
You are fool by their overhype media..



Queen Elizabeth class carrier basically is just a flat top. No catapult, no arrestor hook. During Falkland war, even a British container ship can launched Harrier like Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier...
 
.
LOL Your excuse is very familiar. Do you learn it from India to mask your incompetency? Ship or aircraft crashed often becos of tough training? Are you high on drugs? :lol:

You are fool by their overhype media..



Queen Elizabeth class carrier basically is just a flat top. No catapult, no arrestor hook. During Falkland war, even a British container ship can launched Harrier like Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier...

yes it had A leak they fixed it and moved on

British have big hearts they can sustain such a loss

in China the person responsible would be executed

and the communist party would make a movie and call him hero of the motherland who died trying to save the ship :rofl:
 
.
LOL Your excuse is very familiar. Do you learn it from India to mask your incompetency? Ship or aircraft crashed often becos of tough training? Are you high on drugs? :lol:

You are fool by their overhype media..



Queen Elizabeth class carrier basically is just a flat top. No catapult, no arrestor hook. During Falkland war, even a British container ship can launched Harrier like Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier...
Do you know how many ships and submarines have leaks and problems? Russian and Chinese ships more than others.
Every time there's rust on a Western ship,Russian media go crazy. But how about the problems on Admiral Kuznetsov or other vessels?

We suddenly talk about Chinese "supremacy"? Like @aziqbal said,how? The Royal Navy has had constant experience in naval warfare. Forget about the 16-19th century era. Early 20th century,World War I,World War II,Cold War conflicts. Constant operations since 2001.

Suddenly China builds a gazillion ships (which I am not saying are bad or that China isn't of the strongest countries in the world) and you guys go like "oh China can destroy the British Navy so easily".

Don't underestimate Western countries...
 
.
Do you know how many ships and submarines have leaks and problems? Russian and Chinese ships more than others.
Every time there's rust on a Western ship,Russian media go crazy. But how about the problems on Admiral Kuznetsov or other vessels?

We suddenly talk about Chinese "supremacy"? Like @aziqbal said,how? The Royal Navy has had constant experience in naval warfare. Forget about the 16-19th century era. Early 20th century,World War I,World War II,Cold War conflicts. Constant operations since 2001.

Suddenly China builds a gazillion ships (which I am not saying are bad or that China is one of the strongest countries in the world) and you guys go like "oh China can destroy the British Navy so easily".

Don't underestimate Western countries so easily...
Sorry, Chinese warships and submarine do not have leak problem like UK and its not common. I didn t expect your standard to be so low. Maybe soon you will claim B737 max auto diving problem is also common and we just need to take it as usual....

As for your experience, yes. UK carrier ops is even worst than China carrier ops experience. The F-35 wouldnt crashed if not for the slack handling of missing a plastic inlet cover which suxk into the F-35 engine and caused it to crash.

UK has not handle a real STOBAR carrier for many decades. Those experience carrier seaman has long retired or dead. While PLAN has CV-16 Liaoning since 2012 and we have constant and high tempo training more than any other countries operating aircraft carrier besides USN.

If by your theory of experience, JMSDF inherit the IJN shall have the most aircraft carrier experience due to their previous involvement in WWII?

By your theory, just becos somebody started earlier and that means other cant catch up. Then why Russia is first to put an lander on Mars but still lack behind in China in putting a working rover on Mars?
 
.
Falklands belongs to UK
The main problem with UK is it's reducing its Army size to dangerously low numbers. Which would eventually hurt them really bad. Yes technology in Air Force and Navy has changed lot of things plus AI. But still not having an Army of even 120000 is dangerous and highly threatening for UK.
 
.
As for your experience, yes. UK carrier ops is even worst than China carrier ops experience. The F-35 wouldnt crashed if not for the slack handling of missing a plastic inlet cover which suxk into the F-35 engine and caused it to crash.
So...



The main problem with UK is it's reducing its Army size to dangerously low numbers. Which would eventually hurt them really bad. Yes technology in Air Force and Navy has changed lot of things plus AI. But still not having an Army of even 120000 is dangerous and highly threatening for UK.
I agree there 100%
 
.
So...




I agree there 100%
LOL.. These 2 are fake fabrication source. Try harder. :enjoy: The same Uighur concentration camp story from these 2 media. SCMP is a pro US media based in HK.
 
.
LOL.. These 2 are fake fabrication source. Try harder. :enjoy: The same Uighur concentration camp story from these 2 media. SCMP is a pro US media based in HK.
If Google it there's a lot of sites reporting this story. Are you saying there was no accident?
 
.
If Google it there's a lot of sites reporting this story. Are you saying there was no accident?
Of cos there is lot site. Washington post , CNN, NYtimes, BBC and Reuter parrot the same anti-China trash?
One fake article repeated by many others. I dont think we need an expert to confirm this, right?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom