Xi Jinping Could Make the Same Mistakes as Kaiser Wilhelm II

[Reashot Xigwin]

Trident is not a cruise missile. It is an SLBM. It does not need a base. Zero credibility.

Tell that to the god of pedantics as you are vaporized to nothingness.

 

[CAPRICORN-88]

Trident is not a cruise missile. It is an SLBM. It does not need a base. Zero credibility.

So China SLBM JL-2 or JL-3 do not represent any real threat to USA and yet Pentagon is highlighting them in their report to the US Congress.

 

[CAPRICORN-88]

Tell that to the god of pedantics as you are vaporized to nothingness.

And USA will issued anti-vaporized PPE like suit to all US citizen. They will be safe.
What if Trump lied and you just found out.
Do you have any contingency? Or maybe you just jump into your bath tub?

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

Tell that to the god of pedantics as you are vaporized to nothingness.

it means you have no idea what you are talking about. all this talk about bases this and that, it's all irrelevant with ICBMs. This is not for educating you, since it seems that the concept of "long range, does not need closeby bases" is very difficult for you to grasp. It is for educating others.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

it means you have no idea what you are talking about. all this talk about bases this and that, it's all irrelevant with ICBMs. This is not for educating you, since it seems that the concept of "long range, does not need closeby bases" is very difficult for you to grasp. It is for educating others.

We're not talking about ICBM. Not only you don't know how to read you don't have basic comprehension skill.

Here's the thing:

First no way in hell china is going to target any US cities unless it wants to be wiped out from the face of the earth.

Second any ICBM that china fired would have been detected & intercepted the minute it fired.

Third any Nearby US bases like Okinawa would have been sent B-2 or equivalent armed with nuclear cruise missiles to strike major population center.

This is why SRBM is more likely to be used against US allies & why STRATCOM is more concerned with it.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

First no way in hell china is going to target any US cities unless it wants to be wiped out from the face of the earth.

Second any ICBM that china fired would have been detected & intercepted the minute it fired.

This is why SRBM is more likely to be used against US allies & why STRATCOM is more concerned with it.

1. why? its a tool of state survival.
2. with what?
3. SRBM with conventional warhead.

 

[Paul2]

For all the talk of Xi Jinping's personality, his "arrogance" this, "bullying" that... his speeches are actually extremely neutral with highly standardized diplomatic/political language. Even when he talks "openly" he is a very calm person.

The Prussian kaiser cripple at least finished . . . a high school,. . . and even a university.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

1. why? its a tool of state survival.
2. with what?
3. SRBM with conventional warhead.

The Pentagon literally have a whole department dedicated to shooting down ballistic missiles.

& You accuse me of knowing nothing.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

The Pentagon literally have a whole department dedicated to shooting down ballistic missiles.

& You accuse me of knowing nothing.

with what? paperwork? that's all a department is at the end of the day.

China will only use ICBMs as a tool of state survival. US knows it will never come to that as well.

US doesn't even talk about taking out Kim Jong Un after he tested the Hwasong-15, you think they're going to go after China? lmao. I'll take this as an admission that you know nothing.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

with what? paperwork? that's all a department is at the end of the day.

China will only use ICBMs as a tool of state survival. US knows it will never come to that as well.

US doesn't even talk about taking out Kim Jong Un after he tested the Hwasong-15, you think they're going to go after China? lmao. I'll take this as an admission that you know nothing.

China is more likely to use SRBM mate that's the entire point. That's why china are so adamant about the removal of THAAD despite it not being aimed at them.

Because North Korea is not considered a serious threat that's why KJU are always the object of ridicule in US media. KJU is more of a threat to south Korea.

 

[Feng Leng]

China is more likely to use SRBM mate that's the entire point. That's why china are so adamant about the removal of THAAD despite it not being aimed at them.

LMFAO please send you ideas to Xi Jinping. I am sure he would follow them because it comes from a primitive Indonesian guy.

 

[Zsari]

US bases are US soils & those countries will turn into direct one the moment china launch it first SBM.

While you guys trade cities. US bases in the region would already pummeled most Chinese cities using Trident & other nuclear cruise missiles. Making what ever gain you got absolutely pointless if it hit any city on America the retaliations will be tenfold & that is assuming it can reach mainland US.

STRATCOM knows that china would be most likely arming it's SRBM to target US allies in the region.

Guess you have no idea what MAD is. When US launches nuclear attacks against Chinese cities from its bases in Asia, the retaliatory targets will not be these countries but rather directly at US cities. It will be a pre-emptive attack as in entire ICBM stock will be launched. That's the whole premise of MAD. Whether the retaliatory will be 10 fold or not is pointless as everyone will be going up in a multitude of mushroom clouds.

 

[Paul2]

Guess you have no idea what MAD is. When US launches nuclear attacks against Chinese cities from its bases in Asia, the retaliatory targets will not be these countries but rather directly at US cities. It will be a pre-emptive attack as in entire ICBM stock will be launched. That's the whole premise of MAD. Whether the retaliatory will be 10 fold or not is pointless as everyone will be going up in a multitude of mushroom clouds.

You know, there is only one country in the world which can possibly consider "taking a hit" a valid option during a nuclear war.

 

[Zsari]

You know, there is only one country in the world which can possibly consider "taking a hit" a valid option during a nuclear war.

That's at a time when nations doesn't have thousands and thousands of warheads. Besides, when you have none, you can only make such bluff.

BTW, your statement is historically false, as Japan was the first nation to make such consideration as it did try the last ditch effort in make peace with the USSR while absorbing the nuclear attack from the US.

 

[Paul2]

That's at a time when nations doesn't have thousands and thousands of warheads. Besides, when you have none, you can only make such bluff.

BTW, your statement is historically false, as Japan was the first nation to make such consideration as it did try the last ditch effort in make peace with the USSR while absorbing the nuclear attack from the US.

That country will be also not sitting still, and retaliating with all its might, expecting the adversary to take bigger losses as a percentage of its military-economic power than it does.

That country is also ruled by a political system which is way more suited for total mobilisation, down to 70 years olds with shovels, with a bigger, more militant populace in general, has world's second largest fleet of civilian airliners already being commandeered by ex-military pilots, has world's biggest merchant navy (also staffed by a lot of militia, and ex-military cadres,) and has bigger, and better spread heavy industry complex.