WZ-10 and WZ-19 Photos, many and many of them.

[by78]

 

[by78]

 

[by78]

 

[cnleio]

But compare China WZ-10 with America AH-64, it seems our cockpit additional protection(add-on armor) thinner than Apachi. The issue is our WS-10 shaft turbine still lack enough power(WS-10 maybe 1200kw,T-700-GE-701C has 1800Kw), WZ-10 sacrifice some payload.

BTW still now we didn't see any pic of WZ-10's full-mount, it's a question WZ-10 can carry 16x HJ-10 anti-tank missiles like AH-64 Apachi, or just carry 8x HJ-10 ? WS-10 is not a good "Heart" for WZ-10 but now we only have it for WZ-10.

 

[Shaped charge]

that is all i wanted to know, a sound design is useless without a good power plant..thank god atleast someone can discuss without dragging other countries into it

 

[cirr]

The annual production rate of Z-10 is 48 according to the following “8-legged essay”（official speak）：

http://www.chinanews.com/mil/2013/09-04/5244018.shtml

 

[cnleio]

that is all i wanted to know, a sound design is useless without a good power plant..thank god atleast someone can discuss without dragging other countries into it

WZ-10 is a successful design, 1st domestic real armed helicopter, better & stronger than original WZ-9 in PLA Army. I just said currently WS-10 is not as powerful as AH-64's T-700-GE-701C, but if later China develop more powerful shaft turbine, we can directly use it on WZ-10. Now WZ-10 maybe weaker than AH-64 but much better than PLA's WZ-19 and WZ-9 armed helicopters

 

[cirr]

Z-19

 

[by78]

Some clear details of the chopper.

 

[by78]

 

[cirr]

 

[cirr]

 

[by78]

Your photos are too small and have very low quality.

Please post photos larger than 1280x1024.

 

[by78]

High-Resolution photos:

 

[by78]