No, you’re playing tangential squirrel trying to reflect the same idea you are trying to dismiss.So you still think that aqidah (in the context mentioned above) had nothing to do with Islam?
I suppose Sufi's then don't have anything to do with Islam then? Neither do Shafi, Hanafi, Maliki, Hambali or Jafri schools of thought as these words are not in Quran, right?
I'm just playing Devil's advocate...
the original context of the posts were words related to the Quran,you suggested aqeedah which is NOT a Word exclusive to Islamic context and as YOU mentioned nothing to do with the Quran just as Hijab, Burqa or Niqab have nothing to do with it. So lets stick to the Quran rather than trying to grasp at strawman tangents just so that established dogma is saved.
The Quran is not hanafi, hanbli or tehreek e insaf. It is the core text of Islam from which everything is “derived” and all derivatives cannot conflict with its commandments. Sufism or tasawwuf(not Abida Parveen shaking her head) is stated to be directly related to the method that Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique followed in his practices. It can also be related to the practices of Hazrat Umar Farooq or Hazrat Ali.. this has been diluted and amalgamated and is another topic entirely but the point remains that none of what you are trying to brandish in a all or nothing tangent has anything to do with the Quran.
Let me ask you a similar ridiculous question.
Tomorrow if you find people living in a remote island disconnected from the world, and all you did was drop down a Quran with translation into their language.. and by chance one of them read it and came into Islam but never was able to leave the Island.. would they not have “Aqeedah” or believe in “Tawhid” or practice their idea of Satar?
Would they not be a muslim?