Wireless in Gaza

[TankMan]

I want him to stay here. I appreciate his presence. His threads are exactly appropriate for my rebuttals.

That's funny that he wrote that.

You should start keeping a clipboard like I do, all people like him do is repeat the same lies over and over again, what we end up doing is repeating the same facts and truths over and over again.
Might as well make it more convenient.

''veritas vos liberabit - The truth shall make you free''

You couldn't admit it if it did, could you?

I definitely could.

Since doing so is explicitly forbidden in Pakistan since the Model U.N. fiasco.

You're contradicting yourself now, before the Model UN incident you used to say it was always forbidden in Pakistan. Actually, it isn't, not at all. And even if it was, I am not in Pakistan as of right now. This argument of yours has collapsed entirely.
These kinds of underhanded tactics may work on some, but don't waste your time trying them on me.

Falcon29 resorted to invention several times in this thread.

No, he hasn't. You, on the other hand, like every other Zionist, have 'resorted to invention' dozens upon dozens of times.

The "mirror" is also a device used by people to complain about issues that are forbidden; one is simply supposed to know to substitute the forbidden nouns for the ones employed. Hard to tell what's going on here.

More propaganda tactics - you clearly aren't interested in a debate since you obviously know how badly you'd fail in one, so you resort to this kind of bs. Stop wasting your time.

If the Jews of Israel wanted "domination" of Arabs why don't they remove Hamas and the P.A. to do so? Why did they withdraw from Gaza, sign agreements with Arafat, withdraw from Sinai after conquering it three times, and so on?

First of all, I never said 'Jews'. I said 'Zionists', there's a difference.
Why didn't they remove Hamas and the PA you ask? Because it doesn't work that way. You can't just 'remove' entities like that -they could've tried but then they'd lose their little 'most moral in the world' and 'poor victim' card - most politicians are smarter than that.

Agreements with Arafat? You mean the ones that went down the toilet just like every UN resolution?
And you're delusional enough to believe that they 'withdrew' from the Sinai after 'conquering' it. They retreated because it simply wasn't practical to keep the Sinai - Egypt gained a lot of ground in 1973, wasn't practical for the IDF to keep defending it.
They didn't do it out of goodwill.

it's Arabs who support Hamas who are into "domination"

Even if that was true, its their land. It's justified for them to be 'into' dominating their own land. But since Israel exists now and there's no humane or justified way to change that, I oppose Hamas' ideology. But Hamas didn't even exist when Israel started its killing and oppression.
Accusing Hamas of the same is a mere invention of convenience.

You can lie all you want, I won't accept those lies.
'veritas vincit' - the truth prevails.

 

[lowish]

Hamas's Islamism is mostly cosmetic.

So accusing them to be some sort of Al-Qaeda light is ridiculous, since hardcore Islamists hate Hamas and have been in open conflict with them.

 

[Archdemon]

Obscenity of Zions have no limit !!!

Please read and, please notice how many Palestinians have killed by Zionists not so far.

The question is how many Muslims were killed by other Muslims

 

[IRAN 1802]

The question is how many Muslims were killed by other Muslims

Huge number "Thanks to Wahhabism".

Btw, your Zionist father have killed 5 millions people all over the world, which 3 millions of them are Muslim.

God damn all of Zionists

 

[500]

Troll Solomon now trying to portray Gaza as paradise

Its not paradise, but its better than most of the third world countries.

Here's most moral army in world that Solomon might tell us about next:

Compare to US siege of Fallihaj, Russian siege of Grozny Israeli army conduction is extremely moral. I am not even talking about actions of Syrian/Iranians in Ghouta, Jobar and Yarmouk.

 

[-SINAN-]

The Guardian is a trustworthy source.

Who decides ?