What's new

Winston Churchill’s family begged him not to convert to Islam.

Please elaborate

10470.jpg
 
Yes Burma was part of British India. But whats its relation with Bengal famine?

Bengalis were dead in millions in between 3 to 7 million which in real was the reason for the loss of Indian land. These all were historical events which has made Indian nation to suffer.

A family of Rohingya Muslims at a camp for internally displaced persons in Arakan State.
10.jpg
 
Bengalis were dead in millions in between 3 to 7 million which in real was the reason for the loss of Indian land. These all were historical events which has made Indian nation to suffer.

A family of Rohingya Muslims at a camp for internally displaced persons in Arakan State.
10.jpg
It would have made more sense to give the Rohingya areas to Pakistan/now Bangladesh.
 
It would have made more sense to give the Rohingya areas to Pakistan/now Bangladesh.

Partition of India was itself to cover up the deaths of the 3 to 7 million Bengalis. if that would not happened then Burma was even part of India and Indian people would have been more prosperous.
 
Yeah, because Hindus weren't licking his boots, but kicking his a$$. That's why...
Germans were the only ones who came close to kicking his A$$ and hindus like ghandhi had racist views about blacks just like churchill.
 
Just like many Muslims claimed that Rowan Atkinson Converted to Islam.
 
No powerful politician in their right mind would ever convert to a different faith. It negates their practical intelligence. Anyway, by all accounts Churchill was more of an atheist than anything else. A letter by his sister in law frightened due to his fascination of Islamic culture is no legitimate proof of his religious inclination. Besides, what are these news agencies doing, digging on historical files trying to make news. Even if he had converted, why is that newsworthy. Neither does that news elevate his personal importance nor does it validate or invalidate any specific religion. Besides personal fascination of historic buffs to a particular figure, this isn't much insightful than the present historical accounts of him.

Just like many Muslims claimed that Rowan Atkinson Converted to Islam.
And Atkinson too is an Atheist.
 
No powerful politician in their right mind would ever convert to a different faith. It negates their practical intelligence. Anyway, by all accounts Churchill was more of an atheist than anything else. A letter by his sister in law frightened due to his fascination of Islamic culture is no legitimate proof of his religious inclination. Besides, what are these news agencies doing, digging on historical files trying to make news. Even if he had converted, why is that newsworthy. Neither does that news elevate his personal importance nor does it validate or invalidate any specific religion. Besides personal fascination of historic buffs to a particular figure, this isn't much insightful than the present historical accounts of him.


And Atkinson too is an Atheist.

Read this Batsh*t Crazy Claim Of The Day: Rowan Atkinson Converted To Islam
 
Old news. There have been several throughout the years. Some religious organisations have morbid fascination of trying to legitimize their beliefs by claiming someone famous converted. Same was the case with Emma Watsons photoshopped pictures. i would say again, neither does this legitimize or invalidate any religion whether someone converted to it or not. but the ones trying to make news through it are despicable.
 
Germans were the only ones who came close to kicking his A$$ and hindus like ghandhi had racist views about blacks just like churchill.
LOL.... I don't know who dafaq is "ghandhi", but if you are referring to our Mahatma, you are batshit crazy. MLK Jr and Mandela almost worshiped him.. Your history too is little off.. Turks actually kicked his butt so hard in Gallipoli that he was sacked.... But in India, sadly, only some section of the society was against him where in other section was busy trying to benefit by (self censored)...
 
LOL.... I don't know who dafaq is "ghandhi", but if you are referring to our Mahatma, you are batshit crazy. MLK Jr and Mandela almost worshiped him.. Your history too is little off.. Turks actually kicked his butt so hard in Gallipoli that he was sacked.... But in India, sadly, only some section of the society was against him where in other section was busy trying to benefit by (self censored)...
I'm not batshit crazy and just because MLK,Mandela idolized him doesn't exclude his disdain for Blacks of South Africa.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom