What's new

Winner Of Pakistani Trials To Be Locally Produced

These are all different calibers of bullets. The first number, e.g 5.56 or 7.62, is the width of the bullet.
The second number, e.g 39 or 51, is the length of the cartridge, which contains the powder.

So 7.62x51 is generally more powerful than 7.62x39, but the cartridge is also much heavier (the actual bullet is the same size). The G3 uses 7.62x51, AK47 and Type56 (Chinese AK used by Pak forces) uses 7.62x39.

5.56x45 is used in M4, M16, HK-416, and many other NATO weapons.

Each is good for specific purposes and was designed with different tactics and equipment in mind, so which one is 'better' is highly debatable, but for Pakistan it's best if we stick to the Calibers we already use because shifting the entire military to a different caliber will be expensive.
7.62x51 is generally more powerful than 7.62x39
So it is powerful based on what? range i guess or some thing else?
 
.
7.62x51 is generally more powerful than 7.62x39
So it is powerful based on what? range i guess or some thing else?
There is more powder in the cartridge, so the bullet has a higher velocity, and also travels further. So yes, the 7.62x51 has a greater range, which is why it's often used in sniper rifles and DMR (Designated Marksman Rifles).
It is also better at piercing armour and does more damage in general as more force is transferred into the target.
 
.
There is more powder in the cartridge, so the bullet has a higher velocity, and also travels further. So yes, the 7.62x51 has a greater range, which is why it's often used in sniper rifles and DMR (Designated Marksman Rifles).
It is also better at piercing armour and does more damage in general as more force is transferred into the target.
Thank you very much Brother. Atlast, now i know what you guys talking about:cheers:
 
.
camera2.jpg



Divided if I live the weapon in hand or Uniform better

Very sharp Uniform


However , feel the weapon should have a targeting sight (you know Call of duty has built that bias up)


Certainly something like this is proper
FN-SCAR-H-Beretta-ARX-200-Battle-Rifle-Pakistan-Army..jpg



Certainly difficult choices we all have to make
cz_80510.jpg



I would certainly like to see Technology integrated in the weapon some products we made inside Pakistan
 
Last edited:
.
camera2.jpg



Divided if I live the weapon in hand or Uniform better

Very sharp Uniform


However , feel the weapon should have a targeting sight (you know Call of duty has built that bias up)


Certainly something like this is proper
FN-SCAR-H-Beretta-ARX-200-Battle-Rifle-Pakistan-Army..jpg



Certainly difficult choices we all have to make
cz_80510.jpg



I would certainly like to see Technology integrated in the weapon some products we made inside Pakistan
BREN has miserably failed in summer trials
 
. . .
Any specific reason why SCAR is failing to get orders ?
First it was mainly designed for use of Special Forces. So many Special Forces around the world are adopting them but as it's dam expensive not a single infantry has right now adopted it. I was also shocked to see SCAR in Pakistani trials but later I figured out that most likely some one is backing us up

SCAR H is not 4.5 KG without magazine
 
.
I hope the final decision look into the "add on package" that ship with the weapons
Vision / Targeting system and other tech

A capable soldier can do enough damage with few shots

Would be interested to know what Add-On Packages are being offered by the other guns


Pakistan Should pick
1- MPT-76 (For its support / Add-on packages) (Second Option) Specialist Weapon
2- CZ-807 (As it might be easier to carry by Troops), for Pakistani Soldiers and their general body type the lighter weapon might be easier on shoulders.



Scar should be considered if it offers some decent add on gadgets instead of CZ-807
 
Last edited:
.
Any chance of corruption? Who will decide winner?
 
.
I hope the final decision look into the "add on package" that ship with the weapons
Vision / Targeting system and other tech

A capable soldier can do enough damage with few shots

Would be interested to know what Add-On Packages are being offered by the other guns


Pakistan Should pick
1- MPT-76 (For its support / Add-on packages) (Second Option) Specialist Weapon
2- CZ-807 (As it might be easier to carry by Troops), for Pakistani Soldiers and their general body type the lighter weapon might be easier on shoulders.



Scar should be considered if it offers some decent add on gadgets instead of CZ-807
Why on earth we would choose CZ-807 and MPT-76 when both failed in our trials ?????

I hope the final decision look into the "add on package" that ship with the weapons
Vision / Targeting system and other tech

A capable soldier can do enough damage with few shots

Would be interested to know what Add-On Packages are being offered by the other guns


Pakistan Should pick
1- MPT-76 (For its support / Add-on packages) (Second Option) Specialist Weapon
2- CZ-807 (As it might be easier to carry by Troops), for Pakistani Soldiers and their general body type the lighter weapon might be easier on shoulders.



Scar should be considered if it offers some decent add on gadgets instead of CZ-807
SCAR is coming with full TOT and all the versions will come as well as handguns and Machine Guns. As for optics and Grenade Launcher well for that we are most likely going to Turkey

Any chance of corruption? Who will decide winner?
It would be a committee who will decide and removal of POF chairman from POF to less attractive post is a message that no corruption would be tolerated.
 
.
7.62x51 is generally more powerful than 7.62x39
So it is powerful based on what? range i guess or some thing else?

Caliber.

Bigger bullet, more damage......much higher chances of killing the victim quickly and right away.
 
.
Is it just me or the soldier in the pics resembles with Kulbhushan Yadav?
 
. .
You know everything and everyone has a price. If you have the money, which CIA has plenty of, you can buy anything and anyone. If you do some research, you'll find out CIA was able to buy fully functional Ex-Soviet nuclear warheads from ex-soviet states/persons, these are just ATGM's.

7.62x51 is generally more powerful than 7.62x39
So it is powerful based on what? range i guess or some thing else?

Please grow up and stop making such crappy statements. "Nobody" is backing us up, nobody is doling out billions of dollars to buy these toys. This nation is spending its hard earned money to spend on these weapons. Stop projecting us as beggars.

First it was mainly designed for use of Special Forces. So many Special Forces around the world are adopting them but as it's dam expensive not a single infantry has right now adopted it. I was also shocked to see SCAR in Pakistani trials but later I figured out that most likely some one is backing us up


SCAR H is not 4.5 KG without magazine
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom