What's new

Will not roll back nuclear programme even if debts swell to $100 trillion: Dar

ito

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
9,177
Reaction score
-33
Country
India
Location
India
1058471-nucleararsenalx-1456961377-219-640x480.png


PHOTO: ISPR

ISLAMABAD:
“We will not roll back our nuclear programme even if our debts swell to $100 trillion,” says Finance Minister Ishaq Dar dismissing outright Western media reports that suggest Islamabad could barter its nuclear arsenal for dollars.

“We did not start this [nuclear] programme to roll it back,” Dar told lawmakers in the upper house of parliament on Wednesday. “This is a programme of our security, and it is a national responsibility to protect it,” he added. “All political parties of Pakistan share the ownership of our nuclear programme.”

US expresses concern over security of Pakistan’s nuclear stockpile

The finance minister was briefing the house on the country’s economy. And at the end of his policy statement, he referred to a 2008 article in Wall Street Journal headlined ‘Let’s Buy Pakistan’s Nukes’ in which the author asked Western donors to agree on a $100 billion economic package in exchange for eliminating Pakistan’s nuclear stockpile.

“This will never happen,” Dar said emphatically. He mentioned another article which suggested the ever-ballooning debt may lead Pakistan to compromise on its national security assets. “Even if our debts swell to $100 billion or $100 trillion, we will not roll back our nuclear programme.”

Dar’s forceful statement came after US Secretary of State John Kerry pressed Pakistan at this week’s strategic dialogue to reduce its growing nuclear arsenal. Dar did not mention Kerry’s statement but Senate Chairman Raza Rabbani asked Adviser to Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs to brief the house on this issue along with others.

Aziz would brief the house next Tuesday but Foreign Office has already issued a statement in which Aziz has “impressed upon the United States not to contribute to strategic imbalance in South Asia by helping India. He emphasised that the convergences in the relationship outweigh the irritants.”

On the demand of leader of the opposition Aitzaz Ahsan, the chair asked Aziz to brief the house on his Tuesday’s statement in which he said “Pakistan has some influence over the Afghan Taliban since their leadership lives here”. Ahsan also sought a briefing on Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar’s allegation that the non-state actors who carried out the Pathankot airbase assault had support of the state of Pakistan.

Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal could become world’s third-biggest: report

Earlier, the finance minister painted a rosy picture of national economy in a detailed presentation full of stats and comparison with the past. “A turnaround [of economy] has taken place today, and our next target is growth,” Dar said while inviting the opposition to join hands with the government to further improve the economy.

However, Dar’s hour-long speech failed to earn him appreciation from opposition lawmakers who remained skeptical about the numbers cited by the minister.

The opposition leader was poetic in his criticism as he read a few couplets of Mirza Ghalib mocking Dar’s opinion that borrowing money would one day result in an economic turnaround. He requested the chair provide copies of Dar’s speech to lawmakers so that they could cross-check the figure before a house debate.

PTI Senator Nauman Wazair said he wouldn’t use ‘fudging’ for Dar’s numbers but would call it ‘window dressing’. Other senators pitched in, with MQM’s Barrister Saif saying sarcastically: “We’re very happy to know that our economy is robust. We have no debt to pay – and all is well.”

Resolution on wining Oscar

In other business, the Senate unanimously passed a resolution paying tributes to Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy for winning a second Oscar.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 3rd, 2016.

 
.
That doesn't literally mean Pakistan's debt will swell to a 100 trillion. It's nothing more than political talk to show commitment to the program. Even Indian politicians make ridiculous and inflammatory statements all the time.

Really, this isn't news.
--
What should be news is that Fazlur rehman hasn't been arrested and tried for treason yet, for supporting the murder and murderer of a government official.

I seriously can't believe that no one is talking about this. Also, the desolation of the CII should also be considered.
 
.
in other Words................
We will keep working on our Nuclear program no matter how much Financial Threats are given to us.....................:-)
 
.
in other Words................
We will keep working on our Nuclear program no matter how much Financial Threats are given to us.....................:-)
We will be eating this country financial resources no matter what happen to it!!!
 
. .
1000-1200 warheads along with 50-60 ICBM & Afew hundered Long range cruise missiles with range of about 3000-3500 are more than enough for us...........Uske bd hm khud hi programme rok dnge

1000-1200 warheads along with 50-60 ICBM & Afew hundered Long range cruise missiles with range of about 3000-3500 are more than enough for us...........Uske bd hm khud hi programme rok dnge
 
.
the job of the ishaq dar is to reduce the debt . the number of the nuclear warheads will always be determined by the military. these dirty politicians are doing their politics in the name of nukes. what that ishaq will do? he will simply further increase the taxes on the general public as they have already done. they will never cut down their own expenses. pakistani parliament...hypocrisy at it's best.
 
.
Why they even have to give such statement, politicians are not supposed to give any statement about Nuclear arsenals. But then again we are talking about Pakistan where the country spends $ 2+ billions on just maintaining the warheads in 130-140 numbers. And all armed forces struggles with $ 7 billion annual defence budget.
 
.
1000-1200 warheads along with 50-60 ICBM & Afew hundered Long range cruise missiles with range of about 3000-3500 are more than enough for us...........Uske bd hm khud hi programme rok dnge

1000-1200 warheads along with 50-60 ICBM & Afew hundered Long range cruise missiles with range of about 3000-3500 are more than enough for us...........Uske bd hm khud hi programme rok dnge
First of all, Pakistan has no interest in ICBMs, as it's only real conventional threat is India. Second, 1000-1200? Do you have any idea what you're talking about? While Pakistan's strategic forces command has never given a solid number, most analysts estimate that Pakistan is looking to acquire around 300-350 nukes, which is enough to cover every single major area in India.
 
.
First of all, Pakistan has no interest in ICBMs, as it's only real conventional threat is India. Second, 1000-1200? Do you have any idea what you're talking about? While Pakistan's strategic forces command has never given a solid number, most analysts estimate that Pakistan is looking to acquire around 300-350 nukes, which is enough to cover every single major area in India.

Nukes are only meant as a deterrent not an actual component in military operations. That is why it is important to keep them away from tactical commanders.

Anyway what I am trying to say is that the "number" of nukes Pakistan will have beyond the threshold of MAD is dependant on the eventual gains it accrues when the times comes for roll back. In other words the large number of nukes serves as an important bargaining chip.

The other thing is that 350 number is arbitrary - Pakistan does not have to destroy every single inch of India, it has to destroy enough so that India cannot exist independently as a country and it's major population centres are destroyed. Keeping this in mind and the average yield of strategic nukes - I think One hundred is more than enough. India has stopped growing it's arsenal after reaching a similar number because it believes that the number is sufficient enough a deterrent for China as well as Pakistan (Land and Population much much bigger than India)
 
. . . .
nuke nuke everywhere damn . pakistan must not lay down nukes till regional countries did not lay their nuclear weapons down
 
.
Which only shows commitment ..nothing more..




source of ur claim?

A commitment to become a developed country by 2050 is much better than a commitment to pile $100 trillion in debt to keep your nuclear program live.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom