Will Israel be able to sell the Arrow system to India?

[tvsram1992]

yes sir we can have any name including Bharti but that certain gentleman was interested in getting know the word 'Bhartiya' or 'Bharatiya' which is about the nationality of Indian, hindi of word 'Indian'. like, in english we call a citizen of India as Indian, and in hindi we call him/her Hindustani or Bhartiya because we call India as Hindustan or mainly 'Bharat' in hindi language.

in fact, in english we would write it as Bharatiy but now Lord Ram is written in english as Rama, Sri Krishn is written as Krishna, Gautam Buddh as Buddha, so, we would write hindi of Indian as Bhartiya or Bharatiya, I think

u have good IQ

 

[Hello_10]

u have good IQ

And people like you and Kinetic are very smart, I understand. You people want to be member of Pakistani forum but you don’t want others to get to know how to even spell nationality of India in hindi language. And at the same time, Kinetic is smart enough to catch all those pakistani friends who say “we Bhartis” and he straight says, “change your flag”? and when I want to correct him, he says name of few girls is also Bharti?

Keeping other nationals under wrong information for so long isn’t sign of good IQ

 

[illuminatidinesh]

OUPS WAKE UPPPP - COLONEL sIR

Ask that to ur General.... Oops which one?

---------- Post added at 10:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 PM ----------

And people like you and Kinetic are very smart, I understand. You people want to be member of Pakistani forum but you don’t want others to get to know how to even spell nationality of India in hindi language. And at the same time, Kinetic is smart enough to catch all those pakistani friends who say “we Bhartis” and he straight says, “change your flag”? and when I want to correct him, he says name of few girls is also Bharti?

Keeping other nationals under wrong information for so long isn’t sign of good IQ

U dint catch the girl part... did U? I feel sorry for u.

 

[Kinetic]

yes sir we can have any name including Bharti but that certain gentleman was interested in getting know the word 'Bhartiya' or 'Bharatiya' which is about the nationality of Indian, hindi of word 'Indian'. like, in english we call a citizen of India as Indian, and in hindi we call him/her Hindustani or Bhartiya because we call India as Hindustan or mainly 'Bharat' in hindi language.

in fact, in english we would write it as Bharatiy but now Lord Ram is written in english as Rama, Sri Krishn is written as Krishna, Gautam Buddh as Buddha, so, we would write hindi of Indian as Bhartiya or Bharatiya, I think

But how many Indian language do you know? Hindi is not the only Indian language. While Bharti/Bharati and Bhartiya is a two different words, with somewhat similar meaning many times. I have studied so many about Bharat that I can say few here did so. Whatever that memebr means I know, I have seen idiots like him for many years.

And people like you and Kinetic are very smart, I understand. You people want to be member of Pakistani forum but you don’t want others to get to know how to even spell nationality of India in hindi language. And at the same time, Kinetic is smart enough to catch all those pakistani friends who say “we Bhartis” and he straight says, “change your flag”? and when I want to correct him, he says name of few girls is also Bharti?

Keeping other nationals under wrong information for so long isn’t sign of good IQ

I am too smart, everyone knows that. So is that a smart move by you to take on the smartest one with your weakest point? Think again.

They know what is the nationality of India and what Indians called. But in different parts of India it spelled different including Pakistan/Nepal/Bangladesh.


Now about catching false flag does not need to be smart like me, even you can catch them, like the one just got banned, don't you? lol

 

[Kinetic]

ARROW-3 seems to be a very capable platform.. Very cost effective and certainly much cheaper than THAAD...
Worth looking as an option along with S-500...

THAAD is a different beast all together than any other existing systems. Well proven with the best technology. Arrow-3 needs lots of tests and I doubt it will be more capable than THAAD, because uncle sam do not share the best technologies with anyone else.

 

[sancho]

because uncle sam do not share the best technologies with anyone else.

True, the parts in the article which states that they didn't even wanted to show us the missile or that they are worried about Israeli companies involved in India makes this clear. They simply likes to have the control and that's why they want to sell their arms and techs with many restrictions and limitations.

 

[jha]

THAAD is a different beast all together than any other existing systems. Well proven with the best technology. Arrow-3 needs lots of tests and I doubt it will be more capable than THAAD, because uncle sam do not share the best technologies with anyone else.

Cant compare both right now but an american officer associated with development of ARROW-3 did mention that the kind of advance technology being used in ARROW-3 is never tested in USA.. BTW American involvement in the project is mainly financial.
Tech. used in Arrow system is predominantly Israeli and if given a chance would love to see this new system forming a layer in India's Missile defence...

 

[Machine]

THAAD is a different beast all together than any other existing systems. Well proven with the best technology. Arrow-3 needs lots of tests and I doubt it will be more capable than THAAD, because uncle sam do not share the best technologies with anyone else.

Arrow is not US technology.

 

[Machine]

Defense Ministry conducts first test of “Arrow 3” system

IDF - Israel Defense Forces

 

[Kinetic]

True, the parts in the article which states that they didn't even wanted to show us the missile or that they are worried about Israeli companies involved in India makes this clear. They simply likes to have the control and that's why they want to sell their arms and techs with many restrictions and limitations.

Thats what I worry about so called US cooperation with other countries and the one they want with India. They can forget about any control of jointly developed weapons as India even not agreed with certain end user agreements as well. But they have the best technologies, it is in our interest to get some of the knowhow or sub-systems for our own projects.

 

[Kinetic]

Cant compare both right now but an american officer associated with development of ARROW-3 did mention that the kind of advance technology being used in ARROW-3 is never tested in USA..

That American officer definitely overstating. THAAD developed by Lockheed Martin in cooperation with Raytheon, Boeing, Aerojet, Rocketdyne, Honeywell, BAE Systems and MiltonCAT should be much better as I said Uncle Sam keeps the best for himself.

BTW American involvement in the project is mainly financial.

Arrow-3 has Boeing inputs.

Tech. used in Arrow system is predominantly Israeli and if given a chance would love to see this new system forming a layer in India's Missile defence...

I think there are lots of similarities between PDV and Arrow-3. We have to wait for more details.

---------- Post added at 10:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:32 PM ----------

Arrow is not US technology.

Arrow has many US technologies, like the latest Arrow-3's kill vehicle jointly developed by IAI and Boeing.

 

[Machine]

Arrow has many US technologies, like the latest Arrow-3's kill vehicle jointly developed by IAI and Boeing.

No, KKV is solely IAI development, patented technology. Yes Boeing has an input into the Arrow development/production but not key technologies, Kinetic Kill Vehicle, sensors, radar, netcentric infrastructure, C2I are all Israeli

 

[sancho]

Thats what I worry about so called US cooperation with other countries and the one they want with India. They can forget about any control of jointly developed weapons as India even not agreed with certain end user agreements as well. But they have the best technologies, it is in our interest to get some of the knowhow or sub-systems for our own projects.

The techs are not the issue as long as we have reliable, Russian, Israeli and European partners, but the political power they have is the really valuable part the in the Indo - US relations. See India could live without P8Is, C17s, or C130Js, but the nuclear deal and the pressure they put on certain countries, was crucial for Indias growth.
However, our forces and our foreign policies must remain independent!