What's new

Will India go for war?

Why should we go to war in the first place ?? I mean can anyone please define any objective for any such war ?? LOL :)




FYI, the above guy was never dragged from his bedroom or home and tied on to the vehicle. Even he didn't claim so. He was actually in the wrong place at the wrong time. So he should be prepared for the consequences. :(
You mean to say that vicinity to polling booth is a wrong place, and participating in Indian elections was at wrong time.:undecided:

I Showed Them Voting Ink On My Finger, But They Didn't Listen

'I will never vote again': Kashmiri man used as 'human shield'
 
.
You mean to say that vicinity to polling booth is a wrong place, and participating in Indian elections was at wrong time.:undecided:

I Showed Them Voting Ink On My Finger, But They Didn't Listen

'I will never vote again': Kashmiri man used as 'human shield'

Hmm, actions speaks louder than words. Of-course he will try to defend himself, anyone including me will do the same if caught in the middle of such a situation. Never surprised. The question is did anyone else who went to vote and are doing so for years complained about mistreatment by security forces ?? Why security forces specifically targeted this young man ??

There won't be any smoke with fire my friend. :)
 
.
Let's go for war, use fist to make all disputes clearly one time...sh!t argue, argue again and again, am fedup.
 
.
Hmm, actions speaks louder than words. Of-course he will try to defend himself, anyone including me will do the same if caught in the middle of such a situation. Never surprised. The question is did anyone else who went to vote and are doing so for years complained about mistreatment by security forces ?? Why security forces specifically targeted this young man ??

There won't be any smoke with fire my friend. :)
Same can be said about the officer who abducted him and used him as Human shield. And if he was a stone pelter, why was no case registered against him? Speaks volumes about who is speaking the truth.
 
.
Same can be said about the officer who abducted him and used him as Human shield. And if he was a stone pelter, why was no case registered against him? Speaks volumes about who is speaking the truth.

Now who told you there was not case registered against him ?? LOL :P

Even cases are registered against Major Leetul Gogoi as well, a military court of inquiry and a criminal case with local police. It's matter of another discussion that the Military court had decided in favor of the Major. :azn:
 
.
Now who told you there was not case registered against him ?? LOL :P

Even cases are registered against Major Leetul Gogoi as well, a military court of inquiry and a criminal case with local police. It's matter of another discussion that the Military court had decided in favor of the Major. :azn:
So post a source which states that Farooq Dar was charged for Stone pelting.

Which military court decided in his favour:what:? The last time I heard it was still under inquiry.
 
Last edited:
.
Reading article before bragging helps ..Try Sometime..Here let me help you..a piece from article

"By waging war against Pakistan, New Delhi is hoping to gain on few fronts. It feels it would help contain Kashmir, destabilise Pakistan and, most importantly, disrupt China’s OBOR initiative in Asia and all this might turn the tables in India’s favour. And the timing for carrying out this ‘limited war’ as New Delhi is contemplating, could be this winter when lot of places in the Kashmir valley becomes a ‘No Go’ and the theatre becomes smaller.

Moreover, a war would help in creating a future market for India’s private sector arms producers who are investing in a big way. Already 300 licences have been awarded to local firms. Recently, the Indian government finalised a policy that will allow the entry of private companies into the manufacture of submarines, fighter aircrafts and armoured vehicles through foreign partnerships. India is forecast to spend $250 billion on modernisation of its armed forces over the next decade"

An idiotic article may be a Baible for you but it is stupid article and it can just give some excitement to warmonger but has no stuff in it.
 
.
According to there news channels and websites, India already at war , punitive actions going on loc, para troopers eliminating, BAT and SSG like mosquitoes, Stealthy dhurvs and Teja are pounding forward posts of Pak Army , Hundreds of forward posts been captured by indian army . indian tanks seen on shahra e raisham ..if this is not war then how war look like ? :o:
 
. .
Lol..you don't believe your army but some paid stone pelters.What an irony?
No I don't believe anything blindly.

My country's Army or for that matter any country's army aren't Angels, they are Humans like me and bound to make mistakes.

And I stand by Indian armed personal who follow the below mentioned things

18622246_1930381890553725_6751598720253796951_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
And people still wonder why Hindus hate your kind.

Imagine if someone drew a cartoon of Indian tanks with what Pakistani citizens perceive as holy or sensitive to them.
The perverse perversion of Hindu haters has reached it's peak.
we value human life over a cow. if a cow means more to you than a Kashmiri tied to a tank then you need to kill yourself and be reinvcarnated as a cow. grow up

Rather than going full fledged war, India needs to have diplomatic solution and/or achieve a covert operation in Pakistan to create enough confusion with in them. That will pave for the solution. After all everything is right in war.
mumbai was a test....we can do much better

By not joining the OBOR initiative, India is slowly realising the pain of isolation and they foresee the distress it could bring to India once the initiative evolves fully
 
.
Simple, "those who sow the wind will have to eventually reap the whirlwind". I seriously hope you are not stupid enough not to understand what I mean. :p:



You know something mate, I'm sorry to say but you are still stuck in medieval or 18th/19th Centuries. It's 21st century mate and war's today doesn't mean fully conquering a country and keeping their land. Objectives my friend OBJECTIVES, that is all what matters.

The NATO/US objective in Iraq was to kill Saddam Hussein as simple as that. Didn't they succeeded in that ??

In Libya it was Gaddaffi. Succeeded their as well.

In Afghanistan also they met all their objectives.

But still if you want to feel good that U.S.A couldn't take their land, well use they just lost miserably. :)





What??????????................it goes far deeper than that!!!!!!!!!!!.........
If they simply wanted to ONLY kill Saddam Hussein then there were many ways to do it without invasion........what you just said is as far fetched as the American propaganda which claimed that Iraq had WMD which could destroy Europe in 30 mins.
 
.
What??????????................it goes far deeper than that!!!!!!!!!!!.........
If they simply wanted to ONLY kill Saddam Hussein then there were many ways to do it without invasion........what you just said is as far fetched as the American propaganda which claimed that Iraq had WMD which could destroy Europe in 30 mins.

Do you think it's so easy mate ?? U.S also wanted to Kill Fidel Castro the president of much tiny Cuba, but they tried and failed miserably multiple times. LOL :p:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_attempts_on_Fidel_Castro

It's not that easy to assassinate a nation head as you may think how much small the country may, and Iraq was much better in that case since Saddam never had shortage of enemies if not friends. :-)

Now come up with some better counter arguments next time. :tup:
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom