AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
The 'price' that was paid was by Muslims, who were painted as intolerant, bearded terrorist buffoons globally.Actually no.
The man who was making such cartoons, found out soon enough that it is not easy for him to hurt sentiments of so many people and get away with it. There will be a price to pay for it.
Freedom of Expression but with Responsibility.
That one man's experience drove a whole host of other events and individuals posting cartoons and making fun of Islam and Mohamed to prove a point and act in solidarity with that man's right to freedom of speech.
How does abusing historical figures fit the definition of hate speech?Abusing historical religious figures isn't hate speech? Of course it is. TBH I I assumed we already had laws preventing this.