What's new

Why you should NEVER drink water standing up

. . .
Asalamu Alaikum

Please don't quote sources that mention Mushrik nonsense like the "Ayurveda".



Assalam Alaikum, please don't be ignorant and stupid to reject knowledge regardless of where it comes, as long as it sounds valid based on something called "intellect" and "logic".

And next time don't refer to a piece of knowledge from any source as "Mushrik nonsense", because it shows your own stupidity and lack of understanding, and give bad name to Islam and Muslims with your stupid ignorance mindset.

And if you can't lift yourself from the darkness of self inflicted ignorance, try not to tell people to what to quote and what not to and just stay shut?

Here is some knowledge if you want to fix yourself though, ah but I know the "ego" and "ignorance" work side by side though...


Ayurveda is literally an ancient system of medicine, most of which was developed in the Indus region. Islamic scholars studied this "mushrik" system and adopted many parts of it into Islamic medicine.

Rejecting anything that originates from non-Muslims will continue to keep us in the stone-age and is hypocritical as well. Guess who designed/invented the laptop or the internet that you used to write your message?

Ignorants are not ignorant by default. They are making a choice to be ignorant and jahil on a daily basis. It's completely self inflicted and unfortunately they make a majority of the ones who call themsleves Muslims, yet completely unaware of what it means to be a Muslim.
You can't always help them but feel sorry for them. Their mind works through some ignorant and hypocrite Mullah as their leader, instead of pondering and using their own.
 
.
one should drink water while sitting as instructed by our Prophet. it must be having a scientific reason as well but may be science has not discovered it so far or we dont know the reason for it but the reason described in this thread seems illogical.
 
.
Drink water however you want.
Drown in your own spit for all anyone cares.

Why is this a thing even lol
 
.
Mushrik, Non-Muslim, Kaafir, Idolaters, Athiests...............what has any of that got to do with 'Science' and Knowledge?? Aren't we driving most of the discoveries and developments, medical breakthrough's etc. through Athiests/Christians/Hindus and Communists???

Ayurveda is literally an ancient system of medicine, most of which was developed in the Indus region. Islamic scholars studied this "mushrik" system and adopted many parts of it into Islamic medicine.

Rejecting anything that originates from non-Muslims will continue to keep us in the stone-age and is hypocritical as well. Guess who designed/invented the laptop or the internet that you used to write your message?

Assalam Alaikum, please don't be ignorant and stupid to reject knowledge regardless of where it comes, as long as it sounds valid based on something called "intellect" and "logic".

And next time don't refer to a piece of knowledge from any source as "Mushrik nonsense", because it shows your own stupidity and lack of understanding, and give bad name to Islam and Muslims with your stupid ignorance mindset.

And if you can't lift yourself from the darkness of self inflicted ignorance, try not to tell people to what to quote and what not to and just stay shut?

Here is some knowledge if you want to fix yourself though, ah but I know the "ego" and "ignorance" work side by side though...




Ignorants are not ignorant by default. They are making a choice to be ignorant and jahil on a daily basis. It's completely self inflicted and unfortunately they make a majority of the ones who call themsleves Muslims, yet completely unaware of what it means to be a Muslim.
You can't always help them but feel sorry for them. Their mind works through some ignorant and hypocrite Mullah as their leader, instead of pondering and using their own.

Although laboratory experiments suggest it is possible that some substances in Ayurveda might be developed into effective treatments, there is no evidence that any are effective in themselves.[11] According to Cancer Research UK, no significant scientific evidence has shown effectiveness of Ayurvedic medicine for the treatment of any disease, although massage and relaxation are often beneficial for some cancer patients and there are indications from animal studies that some herbal products used in Ayurveda might be explored further.[63]

Today, ayurvedic medicine is considered pseudoscientific on account of its confusion between reality and metaphysical concepts.[12] Other researchers debate whether it should be considered a protoscience, an unscientific, or trans-science system instead.[13][14][86]

A review of the use of Ayurveda for cardiovascular disease concluded that the evidence is not convincing for the use of any Ayurvedic herbal treatment for heart disease or hypertension, but that many herbs used by Ayurvedic practitioners could be appropriate for further research.[87]

Research into ayurveda has been characterized as pseudoscience. Both the lack of scientific soundness in the theoretical foundations of ayurveda and the quality of research have been criticized.[86][88][89][90]
 
.
Although laboratory experiments suggest it is possible that some substances in Ayurveda might be developed into effective treatments, there is no evidence that any are effective in themselves.[11] According to Cancer Research UK, no significant scientific evidence has shown effectiveness of Ayurvedic medicine for the treatment of any disease, although massage and relaxation are often beneficial for some cancer patients and there are indications from animal studies that some herbal products used in Ayurveda might be explored further.[63]

Today, ayurvedic medicine is considered pseudoscientific on account of its confusion between reality and metaphysical concepts.[12] Other researchers debate whether it should be considered a protoscience, an unscientific, or trans-science system instead.[13][14][86]

A review of the use of Ayurveda for cardiovascular disease concluded that the evidence is not convincing for the use of any Ayurvedic herbal treatment for heart disease or hypertension, but that many herbs used by Ayurvedic practitioners could be appropriate for further research.[87]

Research into ayurveda has been characterized as pseudoscience. Both the lack of scientific soundness in the theoretical foundations of ayurveda and the quality of research have been criticized.[86][88][89][90]

Up until about 2 years ago the medical community, derived by their understanding of science, firmly believed Cholesterol to be the leading candidate in Heart diseases including good and bad Cholesterol and the finer ratio between them...........Now, we know that Cholesterol has no effect on Heart diseases whatsoever.

Please keep an open mind when considering medical science, it is not constant; it rather changes with our understanding of Science based on new discoveries and explanations. And so there can be no absolute to Science.
 
. . . .
Water drank standing up should be heavily taxed.

What about crouching like your lot?

hqdefault.jpg
 
.
Mushrik, Non-Muslim, Kaafir, Idolaters, Athiests...............what has any of that got to do with 'Science' and Knowledge?? Aren't we driving most of the discoveries and developments, medical breakthrough's etc. through Athiests/Christians/Hindus and Communists???
It does. Science has postulated theory of evolution. Billions of people will become mushrik if they believe this theory of science.

BC, aaj kal paani mila to bahut hai. Ghanta koi bole kaise piyen. I often drink lying down.

Although laboratory experiments suggest it is possible that some substances in Ayurveda might be developed into effective treatments, there is no evidence that any are effective in themselves.[11] According to Cancer Research UK, no significant scientific evidence has shown effectiveness of Ayurvedic medicine for the treatment of any disease, although massage and relaxation are often beneficial for some cancer patients and there are indications from animal studies that some herbal products used in Ayurveda might be explored further.[63]

Today, ayurvedic medicine is considered pseudoscientific on account of its confusion between reality and metaphysical concepts.[12] Other researchers debate whether it should be considered a protoscience, an unscientific, or trans-science system instead.[13][14][86]

A review of the use of Ayurveda for cardiovascular disease concluded that the evidence is not convincing for the use of any Ayurvedic herbal treatment for heart disease or hypertension, but that many herbs used by Ayurvedic practitioners could be appropriate for further research.[87]

Research into ayurveda has been characterized as pseudoscience. Both the lack of scientific soundness in the theoretical foundations of ayurveda and the quality of research have been criticized.[86][88][89][90]
Like TCM
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom