What's new

Why Sri Lanka Does Not Trust India?

South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Philippines and Taiwan don't agree with you. Best example of Chinese proxy is North Korea.
north korean is not chinese proxy. and north korean people will not agree with it.
but country like Bhutan is india proxy.
and india itself act like west proxy.
 
Sri Lanka has two neighbours. 1) India 2) Indian Ocean (Both incidentally has 'India' in it):lol:

So Sri Lanka has two options. Either trust India or 'trust' Indian Ocean. I can say the former is better.
 
Why India Does Not Trust Sri Lanka?


Because periodically Lankan govt tried to stab India by its act. In 1948, 65, and 71 they helped Pakistan. Indian govt Beg to Lankan govt to stay out of the feud, But lankan purposefully bought enimity of India by helping Agressor Pakistan.

Now again Lankan govt is helping china , they are providing china there land, resource and help for military purpose. There act is not only provocating India, but Australia and USA as well..

Lankan Rangers must not provoke the hornets... They must follow non-allignment policies. Our western neighbour Pakistan is good example.

So indian govt have Long History of begging is being proved by you!
 
Sri Lanka has two neighbours. 1) India 2) Indian Ocean (Both incidentally has 'India' in it):lol:

So Sri Lanka has two options. Either trust India or 'trust' Indian Ocean. I can say the former is better.

you forgot Maldives :P
 
this is the fundamental stupidity of all Indians..you don't own the Indian oceans..Lanka as an Independent country is free to offer its land, ports and resources as they please.
Yes so plz stop crying bringing india in everything. Your country has always opposed india by supporting enemy nations. Sri-lanka always try to be smart. when they are in need they try to seek india's support. And in return never misses a chance to snub india.
:devil:
 
north korean is not chinese proxy. and north korean people will not agree with it.
but country like Bhutan is india proxy.
and india itself act like west proxy.
Well north korea is on the news for all the wrong reasons while it is the opposite for Bhutan. The ruthless n Korean regime is surviving only because of china. China wants to be an imperialist .

When you look up the word proxy, stooge, puppet,etc ......you get one country........INDIA!
Do you look that up in fake google made by china?
 
Wow, this thread is about why Sri Lanka does not trust India, and these Indians have turned it into a China-bashing thread already? :rofl:
 
Wow, this thread is about why Sri Lanka does not trust India, and these Indians have turned it into a China-bashing thread already

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...nka-does-not-trust-india-2.html#ixzz24NjvIfZU
Sounds like India-Bashing to me..........considering that India didn't bad mouth China at all, all these comments were unwarrented. The guy who said that NK is a proxy of China is pretty much justified, cause that's what it looks like if you take a very general view of the situation. I mean Nk's 80% power is imported from China, most of the weaponry is dependant on China for repairs and replacement, China exerts political influence on it's behalf and it even fought a bloody war to support it!!

When you look up the word proxy, stooge, puppet,etc ......you get one country........INDIA!
north korean is not chinese proxy. and north korean people will not agree with it.
but country like Bhutan is india proxy.
and india itself act like west proxy.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...nka-does-not-trust-india-2.html#ixzz24NjTVG2Y
 
Why Sri Lanka Does Not Trust India?

Shenali Waduge

MONDAY, 20 AUGUST 2012 00:00

We cannot expect either gratitude or apology from India but it is our right to set the story straight as far as India’s role is concerned in establishing terrorism in Sri Lanka.

We now need the world especially the Indian people to understand how its government had launched the separatist struggle in Sri Lanka making a friendly nation a guinea pig to governments and illegal arms industries that turned Sri Lanka into a theatre of war.

It is to the credit of the Sri Lankan State and its valiant armed forces that showed the world how even the most sophisticated and technically savvy terrorist movement can be eliminated within just three years and raises anyone’s concern why other movements exist if the will to eradicate terrorism prevailed just as it finally did in Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka weathered a terrorist movement that ran an international campaign as the victim, used “ethnicity” as a camouflage and was brutal enough to be “recruited” by international forces to carry out their “designs” with time. These design range from political, economic and sociological to even religious emancipation of Asia.

Our contention is that it was India that helped make Asia vulnerable to these external players who today use “terrorism” as sufficient grounds to deploy “security”, “political advisors”, “strategic counsellors” and others all to either further advance or use ground situations to newly create challenges for Governments and nations that are economic targets to secure natural assets.

Nevertheless, lest people forget some of India’s dark and ugly past vis a vis its role in establishing terrorism in Sri Lanka needs continued mention. No friendly nation would secretly create training programmes for Sri Lankan Tamil youth to be turned into militants and ordered to create anarchy in Sri Lanka even if that excuse was due to India’s anger with Sri Lanka’s political leadership. Sri Lanka was certainly caught unawares, its army at the time was ill-equipped and it was also considering these scenarios that the LTTE made its theatrical entry in 1983. The background to that entry should raise the question whether Black July was also staged to provide legitimacy to the movement and enable it to openly carry out its terror campaign and asks the logical question why Sinhalese would attack Tamils to bring international condemnation to itself. This should raise anyone’s eyebrows whether the riots itself were also pre-planned and in Asian countries an exchange of a few notes will suffice to do what the CIA did in Iran.

Be that as it may the initial years of LTTE’s “liberation” crescendo was steered undoubtedly by India. Why would India threaten to invade Sri Lanka and politically humiliate the nation by sending its air force over Sri Lanka’s territory demanding that the cornered Prabhakaran be released in 1987 (Vadamarachchi)? It was in realizing that external players were also lobbying the LTTE that made India quickly push for its version of a political solution – the 13th Amendment and the Provincial Council system.

It is having signed this that India no longer required the explicit services of the LTTE and probably would have contributed to giving orders to the IPKF to eliminate the LTTE – which severed ties with India resulting in LTTE-Premadasa joining their voices to demand India remove the IPKF forthwith. That LTTE was steered not only by India became clear with the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi and it questioned why India did not at that time take a sincere stand on LTTE at least over the death of its former PM without allowing LTTE to unofficially continue to use Tamil Nadu as a logistics and safety base.

Was it because it had concluded that Tamil Nadu leaders lacked the capability of launching Eelam in India or was India as it appears now to be remote-controlled by western forces?

It is perhaps time the Indian people dwell on the notion why neighbours on its border unanimously find India a threat to them personally as well as to the entire South Asian region.

Why Sri Lanka Does Not Trust India? | Opinion


The Question y SL cannot co operate with the South Asia's biggest power?
1.Now The racist sinhalese of yesteryear (am talking about past, not now) tormented the tamils living in the island for 2000 years, by bringing pro sinhalese legislation !
2. They tried tamil genocide on their own island.
3. They helped pakistan and never stayed neutral, even though it got aid and trade from India.
4. They destroyed tamil jaffna library.
5 . They provided arms to LTTE, when Indian soldiers tried to defeat them, perfect case of backstabbing by lankans.
6 . Even after genocide of 40000 tamils, indian govt is still supporting SL, an another case of ungratefull favouritism by congress.
7 . SL have no other neighbours to blame , other than India.
8 . Tamils in India are not oppressed or killed . So an Independent tamil land proposal does not exist. The word "Eelam" itself refers to lankan tamils.
 
The Question y SL cannot co operate with the South Asia's biggest power?
1.Now The racist sinhalese of yesteryear (am talking about past, not now) tormented the tamils living in the island for 2000 years, by bringing pro sinhalese legislation !
2. They tried tamil genocide on their own island.
3. They helped pakistan and never stayed neutral, even though it got aid and trade from India.
4. They destroyed tamil jaffna library.
5 . They provided arms to LTTE, when Indian soldiers tried to defeat them, perfect case of backstabbing by lankans.
6 . Even after genocide of 40000 tamils, indian govt is still supporting SL, an another case of ungratefull favouritism by congress.
7 . SL have no other neighbours to blame , other than India.
8 . Tamils in India are not oppressed or killed . So an Independent tamil land proposal does not exist. The word "Eelam" itself refers to lankan tamils.

1. 2000 years :cheesy::cheesy: you can say then Sinhalese lived in India for the last 5000 years!

2. did genocide in North while letting tamils escape into the Sinhala heartland of South! :disagree:

3. Diplomacy is something you don't know! :tdown:

4. Correction not Sinhalese but United National Party.

5. India provided arms to LTTE when Sri Lanka tried to destroy them. So we are even here! :angel:

6. Prove 40,000 Tamils killed by SLA. PROVE IT!

7. Because India is our only troublesome neighbor!

8. The Eelam refers to Sri Lanka or Sinhala or Seelan or Seilou to chinese or to Ceylon. Get your fact correct, it dosen't refer to Tamils! :oops:
 
Back
Top Bottom