Why Singapore's Lee Kwan Yew stopped admiring India

[Soulspeek]

Its not Indians but Chinese who are known as copy paste masters. You people are so so good at copying stuff that all chinese people look like clones of each other!

Too bad Lee Kuan Yew should told this "India is moron country with 1 billion idiot population". Today they economic are what Chinese created, they copy and now only can produce cheap sh!t. What the hell, stupid India only good at copy Chinese. Idiot Indian cannot do any sh!t, only copies whatever Chinese does.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

Its not Indians but Chinese who are known as copy paste masters. You people are so so good at copying stuff that all chinese people look like clones of each other!

You think so ?

Y U lai ?

 

[feilong]

Its not Indians but Chinese who are known as copy paste masters. You people are so so good at copying stuff that all chinese people look like clones of each other!

Oh you thank Chinese that you Indian learning to copy and paste now?

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

On a separate note, this is an Afghan guy from kabul ........... Seriously.

 

[Soulspeek]

We have enough friends in the world. We can buy anything we wish. It is Chinese who face sanctions and resort to theft and reverse engineer the products.

Oh you thank Chinese that you Indian learning to copy and paste now?

 

[feilong]

We have enough friends in the world. We can buy anything we wish. It is Chinese who face sanctions and resort to theft and reverse engineer the products.

Lol your friends sold you 1960 high tech weapons and you try to reverse engineering tech and turn out you cannot produce a bullet? No wonder your Modi is copying Chinese now, so now you can dream of sups powa India lol.

 

[Soulspeek]

Either you learn proper English or stay in some ching Ching Chinese forum.

Lol your friends sold you 1960 high tech weapons and you try to reverse engineering tech and turn out you cannot produce a bullet? No wonder your Modi is copying Chinese now, so now you can dream of sups powa India lol.

 

[Dragon Ball]

We you can certainly admire him, but what do you mean that the whole world abandoned you ? Singapore exist because the world did not abandon you. You are just a city state and anyone can conquer you if the world din't care.


On a separate note, Lee Kwan Yew's shallow understanding of India surprises me. I though he had more depth.

He got his view of India from the secular Delhites. So no wonder his understanding of India is flawed.

 

[Tshering22]

Avoid personal insults please.

Both sides.

We are talking about Yew's pragmatism that led to Singapore's evolution as a global economic powerhouse.

He knew that Nehruvian socialism will be a failure and had the long term vision to prove it. He knew what was exactly needed in order to sustain and develop a resource-less country.

Which is rightly so. India realized that nehruvian socialism was a failure only in 1990 when our economy was about to collapse and we were cash-strapped; not to mention our biggest ally and financial backer was being torn into pieces due to internal strife.

Sadly, our PMs who had the authority like how Lee had, used it to accumulate wealth, divide the country and use it for their own personal selfish gains. Lee was smart to eliminate certain parts of a democracy which is what led Singapore into a glorious era.

While India to this date continues to worship a system rather than look for the final output.

We you can certainly admire him, but what do you mean that the whole world abandoned you ? Singapore exist because the world did not abandon you. You are just a city state and anyone can conquer you if the world din't care.


On a separate note, Lee Kwan Yew's shallow understanding of India surprises me. I though he had more depth.

Singapore will not be conquered because there are no resources there for anyone.

Why are you belching fire against him?

He's not saying anything wrong.

Lee was smart to gauge what was flawed in the socialist secularist model taht India was following.

Please remember, that we are talking about a leader, THE ONLY leader who brought a third world dump into the world's 3rd richest country today while in India we have 'freedom' to shit and piss on the roads, abuse and do rioting, listen to garbage media and form opinions, whine and shout with candle-light marches across metro cities, but can't afford a tenth the quality of life that Singaporeans enjoy.

BTW the Indian political system is the reason why 50,000 sq Km of our land in J&K is under foreign rule.

Had a country of India's size, resources and capacity followed Singapore model of governance, we would have been a superpower today.

 

[feilong]

Either you learn proper English or stay in some ching Ching Chinese forum.

If you reading my English and replied then you welcome me here? Otherwise just shut up and eat your cow dung and cow urine.

 

[Tshering22]

We have enough friends in the world. We can buy anything we wish. It is Chinese who face sanctions and resort to theft and reverse engineer the products.

Bro, stop attacking him.

We cannot manufacture even reverse engineered products because of sekoolar socialism.

Let's first change that and transform our country.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

He got his view of India from the secular Delhites. So no wonder his understanding of India is flawed.

.... or maybe he just din't care enough. He was focused on making Singapore world class, I doubt he cared much about India or china for that matter.

Singapore will not be conquered because there are no resources there for anyone.

Why are you belching fire against him?

He's not saying anything wrong.

Lee was smart to gauge what was flawed in the socialist secularist model taht India was following.

Please remember, that we are talking about a leader, THE ONLY leader who brought a third world dump into the world's 3rd richest country today while in India we have 'freedom' to shit and piss on the roads, abuse and do rioting, listen to garbage media and form opinions, whine and shout with candle-light marches across metro cities, but can't afford a tenth the quality of life that Singaporeans enjoy.

BTW the Indian political system is the reason why 50,000 sq Km of our land in J&K is under foreign rule.

Had a country of India's size, resources and capacity followed Singapore model of governance, we would have been a superpower today.

He said plenty wrong, but I do not see where I am belching fire against "him". Who is "him" ?

I am specifically talking about Lee's flawed understanding about India that is being portrayed here. He is / was great for Singapore, a city. Its like being a glorified Mayor and he did a great job of that. Let us not blow it out of proportion.

I do admire the work he did for Singapore, just do not respect his opinion about India. Its as simple as that.

 

[Dragon Ball]

.... or maybe he just din't care enough. He was focused on making Singapore world class, I doubt he cared much about India or china for that matter.

I watched some of his interviews and he had amazing grip on history, politics, economy of various countries of the world. He messed up on India a little bit, mainly because I think all the literature he got and all the interaction he had was by the seculars and congrezzies in India. There has been no popular counter narrative of India until now, hence it is understandable.

This was a guy who never did things by half measures.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

I watched some of his interviews and he had amazing grip on history, politics, economy of various countries of the world. He messed up on India a little bit, mainly because I think all the literature he got and all the interaction he had was by the seculars and congrezzies in India. There has been no popular counter narrative of India until now, hence it is understandable.

This was a guy who never did things by half measures.

I know, I too have watch his interview and have read his writings on the issue and they show clarity of thought and action. However I do not buy into the fact that his understanding of India was based on his interactions with "seculars" and congis. As an intelligent man I expect him to know what to swallow and what to spit.

End of the day, your opinions are your own and you have to own up to it. You cannot blame the literature of the time. Not if you want to be viewed as a visionary leader.

 

[Luca1]

I know, I too have watch his interview and have read his writings on the issue and they show clarity of thought and action. However I do not buy into the fact that his understanding of India was based on his interactions with "seculars" and congis. As an intelligent man I expect him to know what to swallow and what to spit.

End of the day, your opinions are your own and you have to own up to it. You cannot blame the literature of the time. Not if you want to be viewed as a visionary leader.

His view that India was stitched by the British rail lines was accurate. India was created by the British. Evidence of that is India just lost cricket to another Former British colony