Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well, this was a muslim judge, had to be, right ? or the intolerance brigade would have jumped on it.These Judges have some guts man... they say things that a common man can not.. even though he wants to ...God created everyone equal... why should laws be different for anyone... On man... One woman...Why is it such a problem for some people. Quoting some random examples form history doe not justify your acts.
You are rightYou can't really give rational explanations to religious dictum.
If a religion says it is necessary to paint your face blue or hop on one leg or cover your right elbow or whatever you cannot argue with it by providing scientific proof that it is not necessary.
Presumably the original reason that men were allowed to marry many women was that it enabled alpha males to reproduce more than their meeker counterparts, you cannot use modern notions of feminism to counter that. You have to find some religious justification for it, which I am sure can be found and will be found. When people see the need for change they will find the religious justification to do so.( or bend ancient rules with modern interpretations)
Give it ten to fifteen to years at most , India will have UCC.
You are right
What was the logic in Hindu widow HAD to do satti and die along with her husband? And why no such obligation to men?