What's new

Why neighbours dislike or suspect India

Brutal killings unabated on Indo-Bangladesh border
Adam Abdullah, November 6, 2017
Felani-3-F-1-min.jpg

It has been six years since Bangladeshis woke up to the horrendous photograph of 15-year-old Felani Khatun of Phulbari in Kurigram, hanging upside down on the barbed fence on the Bangladesh-India border with a Indian Border Security Force (BSF) trooper standing nearby.

This heartless act of killing a 15-year-old, and then having her body hang for the public to see, smacked of medieval barbarism. People in Bangladesh were outraged but it got little or no coverage in the Indian media.

Felani was returning home from India with her father through the Anantapur border along Phulbari Upazila of Kurigram on January 7, 2011 when BSF troops fired on her. Trooper Amiya Ghosh, who allegedly killed the child, faced two phases of trial in a court in India, but only to be acquitted at the end.

Killing of Bangladeshis trying to cross the border or lingering near it is continuing though 50 percent of the 4,096 km border had been fenced by March 2017.

However, the numbers have come down since 2010. While the number of killed was above 50 per year from 2007 to 2010, it ranged between 23 and 30 from 2011 and 2017 according to a study conducted by the South Asian Monitor (SAM). This could be attributed to border fencing which makes crossing difficult.

With data collected from documentation cells, newspapers and human rights organizations like the Bureau of Human Rights, Odhikar, Ain O Salish Kendro, SAM found that 494 people were killed and 484 injured by the Indian BSF between 2007 and 2017. That comes to 49 innocent people being eliminated every year in pursuit of “national security”. (See box for detailed year and month wise figures).

According to other sources, between 2006 and 2016, an average of 40 people, mostly Bangladeshis, were killed every year. The Guardian reported that almost 1000 had lost their lives on the border by 2011.

Bangladesh says that those killed are innocent villagers who might have strayed across the porous and very long border inadvertently, and that the BSF often enters Bangladesh to indulge in vengeful killing or even in “land grabbing”.

But the Indians say that the victims are typically cattle smugglers, currency racketeers and even Islamic terrorists who have links on both sides of the border.

According to Daily Mail of UK, about 3000 cows were smuggled across the Indo-Bangla border “every day” till recently. According to an estimate in the Christian Science Monitor Indo-Bangla cattle trade was valued at US$ 1 billion in its heyday. Daily Mail put it at a whopping US$ 5 billion a year.

While cow smuggling is totally banned by India, Indian cows are welcome in Bangladesh for beef, especially during Islamic festive seasons.

Fencing of the border, which is now half done, appears to have brought down cattle smuggling drastically. Smuggling of fake Indian currency by Islamic terror cells was a problem till demonetization of 85% Indian currency in circulation in late 2016.

The Guardian wrote: “Shockingly, some Indian officials endorse shooting people who attempt to cross the border illegally, even if they are unarmed. Almost as shocking is the lack of interest in these killings by foreign governments who claim to be concerned with human rights. A single killing by US law enforcement along the Mexican border makes headlines. The killing of large numbers of villagers by Indian forces has been almost entirely ignored.”

To control this, and also due to officially induced paranoia about Islamic terrorism, the BSF has been allowed to “shoot to kill”. Trigger happy BSF troopers have used this as a short cut to solve the problem. It does not matter to them if most of the victims are innocent as these are citizens of a weak country, which cannot retaliate.

The border guard organizations of the two countries meet periodically but little is achieved because the Indian side describes the victims as criminals and the Bangladeshi side insists that they are innocent.

Recent incidents: A Bangladeshi cattle trader was killed on March 2014 at the border near Satkhira Sadar Upazila by BSF. On January 2016, a Bangladeshi cattle trader was allegedly tortured to death by members BSF at Burungamari Upazila in Kurigram district. The same month, another Bangladesh national was killed by BSF in Sapahar Upazila in Naogaon District.

In April 2016 a Bangladeshi cattle trader was shot in Kurigram district. On June 2016, two Bangladeshis were killed by BSF in Gomostapur. A teenager was killed and three others were injured in BSF shooting in Chuadanga when they went to pick mangoes near the border on May 2016. The BSF suspended seven of its men following this incident.

However, human rights groups have issued strong statements against the killings. Casting India for its callousness, Brad Adams, Executive Director of the Asia Department of Human Right Watch said: “Routinely shooting poor, unarmed villagers is not how the world’s largest democracy should behave,” Adams said.

Commenting on the killings, The Guardian wrote: “Shockingly, some Indian officials endorse shooting people who attempt to cross the border illegally, even if they are unarmed. Almost as shocking is the lack of interest in these killings by foreign governments who claim to be concerned with human rights. A single killing by US law enforcement along the Mexican border makes headlines. The killing of large numbers of villagers by Indian forces has been almost entirely ignored.”

Some of the victims have been children. One father recounted how his sons were beaten by BSF officers. “The BSF personnel surrounded the boys and without giving any reason started beating them with rifle butts, kicking and slapping them. There were nine soldiers, and they beat my sons mercilessly. Even as the boys fell down, the BSF men continued to kick them ruthlessly in their chests and other sensitive organs,” The Guardian wrote in 2011.

“Under pressure, senior Indian officials have expressed revulsion at the behaviour of the BSF and have promised to send new orders to end the shoot-to-kill policy. They have committed to use nonviolent means to apprehend illegal border crossers or smugglers where they pose no risk to life.”

“The question is whether this will be translated into action on the ground. Similar promises of zero tolerance for abuses have been made in Kashmir and elsewhere but have not been fulfilled,” The Guardianwrote.

There has been a reduction in the killings, but this is due more to the fencing than any change of heart on the part of the BSF.
Human rights violations by Indian Border Security Force (BSF), 2007 – 2017
2017 Killed Injured
January
06 07
February 04 08
March 01 —
April 02 03
May 01 —
June 03 06
July 01 03
August — —
September 04 02
October — —
November — —
December — —
Total 41 32
2016 Killed Injured
January
02 03
February — —
March — —
April 01 —
May 02 03
June 03 02
July 03 —
August
September 06 02
October 01 05
November — —
December 09 —
Total 27 15
2015 Killed Injured
January
02 05
February 02 04
March 02 02
April 09 05
May 01 —
June 01 02
July 02 02
August 02 06
September 01 04
October 02 04
November 03 —
December 02 05
Total 29 39
2014 Killed Injured
January
02 01
February — 03
March 03 08
April 05 08
May 01 02
June 02 02
July 01 03
August 01 03
September 03 07
October 07 01
November 03 02
December 02 02
Total 30 38
2013 Killed
Injured
January
07 03
February 01 03
March 03 02
April 02 03
May 02 09
June 03 03
July — 03
August 02 07
September 01 03
October 03 11
November 01 02
December 02 03
Total 23 56
2012 Killed Injured
January
03 03
February 01 09
March 02 03
April 02 08
May 03 01
June 02 02
July 02 02
August 04 02
September 02 02
October 06 11
November — 02
December 04 02
Total 30 47
2011 Killed Injured
January
03 01
February 04 01
March 01 02
April 03 02
May 05 —
June 04 07
July — —
August 01 04
September — 03
October — 01
November 02 —
December 06 06
Total 29 27
2010 Killed Injured
January
10 05
February 05 15
March 05 30
April 01 02
May 03 02
June 05 03
July 05 02
August 05 03
September 02 02
October 04 03
November 05 02
December 04 03
Total 54 72
2009 Killed Injured
January
03 04
February 07 05
March 05 04
April 06 08
May 08 08
June 05 02
July 13 05
August 04 01
September 05 03
October 08 —
November 05 02
December 04 07
Total 73 49
2008 Killed Injured
January
08 05
February 17 04
March 04 02
April 04 06
May 03 05
June 05 03
July 10 06
August 04 03
September 02 02
October 02 —
November 05 02
December 01 02
Total 65 40
2007 Killed Injured
January
14 06
February 11 17
March 11 10
April 09 06
May 08 06
June 03 02
July 03 —
August 08 03
September 06 05
October 07 03
November 07 08
December 06 03
Total 93 69
https://southasianmonitor.com/2017/11/06/brutal-killings-unabated-indo-bangladesh-border/
 
12:00 AM, November 04, 2017 / LAST MODIFIED: 03:33 AM, November 04, 2017
Arms Smuggling: Just so easy
Criminals, terrorists rely on supplies from India through Chapainawabganj border
arms_smuggling_easy.jpg

Shariful Islam
In recent years, the country's northwestern border in Chapainawabganj has emerged as a major route for smuggling in arms. It has of late become militants' most preferred point for collecting illegal firearms and explosives.
This is the route through which terror outfit “Neo JMB” smuggled in the guns and bombs used in last year's Gulshan café attack.
With such chilling information surfacing, Shariful Islam visits the zero line area of Indo-Bangla border in the district to investigate how the illicit trade goes on there so easily.

It's just a piece of cake for him. An inhabitant of a remote village in Shibganj upazila of Chapainawabganj, he has been involved in smuggling for one and a half decades.

Born and brought up in the village, Karim (not his real name) had frequented India since his boyhood without any valid documents until the border with Malda of West Bengal was fenced some 10 years back. His home is within one kilometre of the zero line.

The barbed-wire fence could not stop smuggling. In October last year, police raided a house in Chapainawabgabj town and recovered 22 foreign-made pistols, 45 magazines and 136 bullets -- all brought from India.

Karim, now 37, started with phensidyle at a very young age and turned to arms three to four years back as it fetches more money.

Once he gets an order, he makes a phone call to his counterpart in Malda with an Indian SIM card. He uses code words like Goru (cow) for 9mm pistol, Bokna (cow that has not calved) for 7.62mm pistol, Bachhur (calf) for 6mm pistol and capsule or bichi (seed) for bullets.

Once the person on the other side collects the items, he calls back using a Bangladeshi SIM card. The two then gather near the fence at an opportune moment and packages are lobbed from the Indian side across the fence, dodging the eyes of border guards.

When Karim uses Indian SIM, it is not possible for law enforcers in Bangladesh to track him. The same is true for his counterpart.

In September, after over an hour's drive by a microbus from Chapainawabganj town and 10 minutes' walk, this correspondent reached the zero line in Shahabazpur union of Shibganj.

Paddy fields and bushes in the zero line area and on the other side of the barbed-wire fence facilate the consignment delivery without being noticed.

Apart from gunrunners and criminals, militants also use the border point to smuggle in firearms and explosives from India, investigators say.

“We just bring in arms when parties place orders. We do not know who is a criminal and who is a militant,” Karim said, standing near the zero line on September 14.

He agreed to talk to this correspondent after being persuaded by a source on condition that his identity would not be disclosed.

Police and local sources said there are over a dozen professional arms smugglers in Chapainawabganj that shares 155km border with India's Malda and Murshidabad districts.

“Finding small firearms or bullets in the bordering areas of Malda and Murshidabad is no big deal,” Karim said.

He added, “I just bring in the arms and hand those over to parties. There are people who would carry your arms if you pay them. After a certain distance, the goods change hands.”

The parties sometimes assign labourers to take the consignment directly to the capital, Karim said, claiming that he has kept himself out of the racket these days as he is facing cases though not related to smuggling.

Sometimes, cowboys while bringing cattle from India through corridors in different districts including Chapainawabganj also carry firearms and bullets.

The items often remain hidden inside goods-laden trucks entering Bangladesh through land ports, according to sources in law enforcement agencies.

Smuggling goes on also through several points of 4,096km porous border shared by Bangladesh and India.

Apart from firearms and explosives, phensidyle and heroin are smuggled in from India while counterfeit Indian currencies smuggled out from Bangladesh.

According to Karim, the price of a 6mm pistol is around Tk 20,000, 7.62mm pistol Tk 32,000 and 9mm pistol Tk 40,000 in India. Local smugglers pay the money through hundi, a method of illegal money transaction.

The 6mm, 7.62mm and 9mm pistols sell at around Tk 40,000, Tk 60,000 and Tk 76,000 respectively once they reach the capital.
MILITANCY, MALDA & MUNGER
Nine firearms, including three AK-22 rifles, and grenades used by the “Neo JMB” militants in Gulshan café attack on July 1 last year were brought in through Chapainawabganj and Jessore borders. Those were manufactured in Munger of Bihar, investigators said.

On August 15 this year, the National Intelligence Agency of India along with local cops busted a house, used as an arms factory, in Devipur village under Kaliachak Police Station in Malda. Kaliachak is just around 10km of Shahabazpur in Chapainawabganj.

The Devipur operation was conducted following information from Bangladesh police, said Md Moniruzzaman, assistant inspector general (intelligence and special affairs) at Police Headquarters.

During the raid, law enforcers seized 48 firearms, inlcuding 9mm and 7.62mm pistols, and arms manufacturing materials.

The firearms were made in Munger, known as a village of small arms makers. Mohammad Sayeed alias Mannai, the chief manufacturer, has been arrested.

On September 6, cops arrested suspected “Neo JMB” member Touhidul Islam from Dhobrabazar of Shibganj with a pistol and four bullets.

Chapainawabganj police, BGB and Rab seized 75 firearms and over 33kg gunpowder and arrested 116 people in eight months till August.

Chapainawabganj Superintendent of Police ATM Mojahidul Islam, who played a key role in busting a number of militant dens in the district in recent months, said they, in close coordination with BGB and Rab, have been working to stop smuggling.

Lt Col SM Abul Ehsan, commanding officer of BGB 9, told The Daily Star on October 19 that they always stay alert to check smuggling.

The Border Gaurd Bangladesh (BGB) recovered a number of illegal arms in Chapainawabganj border area since last year, he mentioned, refusing to accept that this is an established route for smuggling.

Ahsan said there might have been some smuggling activities there in the recent past but the situation is now under control of border guards amid constant vigilance.
CTG CONNECTION
Smugglers also use Mizoram border to bring arms into the country apart from the sea route, said sources in agencies. Chittagong Hill Tracts borders the Indian state on the east.

The 22 foreign-made pistols and bullets police seized in Chapianawabganj on October 24 last year were destined for Chittagong. One Osman Ali of Boalkhali upazila in Chittagong used a cowboy of Telkupi in Shibganj to smuggle in those.

In 2005, an NGO named Bangladesh Development Partnership Centre estimated that there were around 4 lakh illegal firearms in the country.

In the first six months of this year, police and different other agencies have recovered 1,128 illegal firearms across the country.
[Subrata Acharjee in Kolkata and Rabiul Hasan Dollar in Chapainawabganj contributed to this report]
http://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/arms-smuggling-just-so-easy-1486057
 
DELHI’S BANGLADESH POLICY
India’s arrogant behaviours with Bangladesh leaders

Dr.Taj Hashmi
Countercurrents.org

MR. PRANAB Mukherjee tells it all! India’s immediate past President Pranab Mukherjee,82, in his The Coalition Years, 1996-2012 – his twelfth book – tells his own tale about the last 16 years of his experience in active politics until 2012, when he became the President of the Republic.
He was in active politics for 43 years (1969-2012), holding important positions as MP; Leader of the Lok Sabha, and Rajya Sabha;

Deputy Chair of the Planning Commission; Defence; External Affairs; and Finance Minister. But for Congress President Sonia Gandhi’s selection of Manmohan Singh, he would have become the Prime Minister.
Pranab’s role in 2008 poll
Since I haven’t seen his latest book yet, this piece isn’t about the book per se but what media has revealed from excerpts of the work, some of which are very revealing, and relevant to Bangladesh. This piece is all about the excerpts, which I consider very disturbing from the Bangladeshi perspective. The small paragraph on India’s relationship with Bangladesh tells us all.

I know those who know about India’s hegemonic designs in Bangladesh, and its big brotherly attitude toward all its smaller neighbours, the excerpt I’m referring to here gives them the “you’re telling me!” moment.

They know, as I know, India has been very condescending, deceptive, domineering, and demeaning to Bangladesh. And Pranab Mukherjee – possibly inadvertently – has re-confirmed our perception and experience that India considers itself a hegemony, a neo-colonial master in the postcolonial world. Some of Pranab Mukherjee’s up-close comments about his intimate personal relationship with Sheikh Hasina and her family members, and some other important people in Bangladesh is very discomforting for patriotic Bangladeshis in general.

However, those who want Bangladesh to remain an Indian satellite, would be ever thankful to Mukherjee for his role in doctoring the 2008 Elections in Bangladesh.


In Part II of his autobiography, he narrates an episode which virtually amounts to meddling in the internal affairs of Bangladesh. Mukherjee writes: “In February 2008 (while he was India’s External Affairs Minister), Bangladesh army chief Moin Ahmed came to India on a six-day visit.
He called on me too. During the informal interaction, I impressed upon him the importance of releasing political prisoners.” T
hen Mukherjee mentions his assuaging the fears of the General about his personal safety under Hasina Government: “I took personal responsibility and assured the general of his survival after Hasina’s return to power….With my intervention through the then National Security Advisor MK Narayanan, I ensured the release of all political prisoners and the nation’s return to stability.” He also mentions India’s continued engagement with the military-backed caretaker government in Bangladesh.
Meddling in internal politics
What’s even more revealing in the autobiography that after Hasina came to power, she assured that General Moin would remain in office, and that Pranab Mukherjee also reprimanded Awami League leaders who deserted Hasina during her bad days: “In fact, when some Awami League leaders deserted her at the time she was in jail, I rebuked them for their stand and told them that to leave someone when they are down is unethical.” One may thank Mr Mukherjee for being so candid and honest! But there’s a problem here! He tells us – despite being an Indian politician – he regularly meddled in the internal affairs of Bangladesh, and moulded its politics to serve Indian interests.

So far, so good! We know India has always been an intrusive big brother, and a malignant neighbour of Bangladesh. And as to how some top Indian leaders assert India’s hegemony over Bangladesh is well-reflected in a personal correspondence of Dr Kamal Siddiquie, a former Principal Secretary to the PM Khaleda Zia, with this writer on October 23, 2017. He gives a candid eye-witness account of as to how India’s External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee behaved with PM Khaleda Zia in this regard, at a top-level meeting in New Delhi in 2006:

“It was a formal official meeting between the two PMs in Delhi in March 2006. On our side were the PM, Foreign Minister Morshed Khan, State Minister for Foreign Affairs Reaz Rahman, myself the Principal Secretary, and Shamsher Mobin Choudhury, the Foreign Secretary. As soon as the meeting began, I found the Indian Foreign Minister grossly overstepping his role and firing broadside against us, for our ‘bad behaviour’ with India, including our alleged support to the ULFA which was a damn lie. As he was speaking, he was also pointing his finger at our PM in a most disgusting manner, and it showed that he was no gentleman. His language was the Babu English spoken by clerks in West Bengal.”
India’s Bangladesh policy
Dr Kamal Siddiquie’s account corroborates what Babu Pranab Mukherjee – who was once an upper division clerk – has written about his manoeuvring and undermining Bangladeshi politicians in the recent past. There’s no reason to assume that he was the first and only Indian leader to do so. Even senior Indian civil servants at times could be much more powerful than most powerful and influential leaders in Bangladesh.

We know India’s former External Affairs Secretary Sujata Singh – who was just a public servant, not politician – directly intervened into Bangladesh politics on the eve of the so-called parliamentary elections of January 5th 2014.
She flew to Dhaka, and literally coerced Ershad into submission. Who, till his close-door meeting with Sujata Singh in Dhaka was unwilling to take part in the farcical elections, had to change his mind. He participated in the voter-less election, and was “elected” uncontested.
As desired by India, Ershad simply legitimised Hasina’s re-ascendancy to power, for another five years.

In view of the above, it’s obvious that Indian politicians in general – particularly those from the Congress Party – leave no stone unturned to see their own people in power in Bangladesh.
Their most preferred Bangladeshi politicians mostly belong to the Awami League and the various factions of the Jatiya Party, originally floated by General Ershad.
Possibly with the exceptions of Morarji Desai, V.P. Singh, and I.K. Gujral, all Indian Prime Ministers since 1971 have been intrusive and hegemonic with regard to Bangladesh. What we get from the anecdotes narrated by Pranab Mukherjee in his latest book, and from his grossly disrespectful behaviour with Khaleda Zia – a visiting Prime Minister from Bangladesh in 2006 – are just tips of the iceberg called “India’s Bangladesh Policy”, which is all about treating Bangladesh as an Indian satellite, not as a sovereign country.
Leaves a bad taste in mouth
As Mukherjee’s condescendingly intrusive mindset with regard to the internal affairs of Bangladesh is sickening, so are his public assertions as to how he treated General Moin, and rebuked those Awami League leaders who deserted Sheikh Hasina while she was in jail during the army-led “caretaker” government in 2007-2008.

Most importantly, Bangladesh should not take Pranab Mukherjee as an exception in this regard.
There’s no reason to believe that Narendra Modi, Shushma Swaraj, and other members in the Modi Government have any benign or non-intrusive policy toward Bangladesh.

What Shushma Swaraj did during her recent visit to Bangladesh – she didn’t meet Rowshan Ershad, the so-called Leader of the Opposition, and instead met Khaleda Zia (despite Hasina’s dislike) – shouldn’t make self-respecting and patriotic Bangladeshis complacent about New Delhi’s not-so-hidden anti-Bangladesh agenda.


Nothing would be more counterproductive and disastrous for Bangladesh than considering Modi a better alternative to Manmohan, and Shushma Swaraj a better person than Pranab Mukherjee, with regard to India’s Bangladesh policy.
By the way, who’s Shushma Swaraj to tell Bangladesh that parliamentary elections under an unelected caretaker government is not the right thing for democracy?

Dr Taj Hashmi teaches security studies at Austin Peay State University in the US. He is the author of several books, including his latest, Global Jihad and America: The Hundred-Year War Beyond Iraq and Afghanistan(Sage, 2014).
tajhashmi@gmail.com
http://www.weeklyholiday.net/Homepage/Pages/UserHome.aspx
 
Weapons in Indian trucks:Mayhem over arrest of C&F agent
ভারতীয় ট্রাকে আগ্নেয়াস্ত্র, সিঅ্যান্ডএফ এজেন্ট আটক করায় তুলকালাম

benapol-bondor_63048_1510215782.jpg

From Benapole land port a truck loaded with Indian imported consignment বেনাপোল স্থলবন্দরে ভারত থেকে আমদানিকৃত পণ্যবোঝাই ট্রাকে আগ্নেয়াস্ত্র পাওয়ার জেরে এক সিঅ্যান্ডএফ কর্মচারীকে আটক করায় তুলকালামকাণ্ড ঘটেছে।
সিঅ্যান্ডএফ এজেন্ট কর্মচারীরা অনির্দিষ্টকালের জন্য C & F of both the countries দুই দেশের মধ্যে আমদানি-রফতানি বাণিজ্য বন্ধ করে বিক্ষোভ করেছেন তারা।

সিঅ্যান্ডএফ এজেন্ট কর্মচারী ইউনিয়নের আন্দোলনের মুখে বৃহস্পতিবার সকাল থেকে বেনাপোল-যশোর সড়ক অবরুদ্ধ হয়ে পড়েছে।

কয়েক হাজার কর্মচারীর আন্দোলনের কারণে বন্দর থেকে মালামাল লোড-আনলোডসহ বন্ধ রয়েছে সব ধরনের পণ্য খালাশ প্রক্রিয়া।

ফলে চাল ও পচনশীল পণ্যসহ শত শত পণ্যবোঝাই ট্রাক আটকে আছে উভয় বন্দর এলাকায়।

এ ছাড়া বেনাপোল থেকে দূরপাল্লার যাত্রীবাহী বাসসহ সব ধরনের যান চলাচল বন্ধ রয়েছে।

জানা গেছে, on Wednesday on a tip off an Indian truck বুধবার রাতে খবর আসে ভারতীয় ট্রাকে আগ্নেয়াস্ত্র রয়েছে বলে খবর আসে।

এর পর রাত সাড়ে ১০টায় বেনাপোল বন্দরের ভারতীয় ট্রাক টার্মিনালে কাস্টমস, বন্দর, বিজিবি, পুলিশসহ বিভিন্ন সংস্থা অভিযান চালায়।

এ সময় ভারতীয় bearing Indian number plate # N -23 P -0373ন-২৩ প- ০৩৭৩ নম্বর ট্রাকের ডালার পেছনে কাগজে মোড়ানো প্যাকেট থেকে পুরনো একটি দেশি ওয়ানশুটার গান ও দুই রাউন্ড বন্দুকের গুলি উদ্ধার করা হয়।

এদিকে অভিযানের খবর পেয়ে আগেই পালিয়ে যান ট্রাকচালক। ওই ট্রাকের পণ্য চালানের আমদানিকারক ঢাকার ইউনিয়ন লেবেল এক্সেসরিজ লিমিটেড।

পরে অস্ত্র উদ্ধারের ঘটনায় সিঅ্যান্ডএফ কর্মচারী মিকাইল হোসেনকে আটক করা হয়।

তার নিঃশর্ত মুক্তি না দেয়া পর্যন্ত আমদানি-রফতানি বন্ধ থাকবে বলে জানিয়েছেন আন্দোলনকারীরা।
https://www.jugantor.com/online/country-news/2017/11/09/63048/ভারতীয়-ট্রাকে-আগ্নেয়াস্ত্র,-সিঅ্যান্ডএফ-এজেন্ট-আটক-করায়-তুলকালাম
 
Last edited:
Bangladesh is now very insecure with JMB and ARSA cadres gaining sympathy ,so many Rohingya in Bangladesh , Bangladesh can be destabilized if it continues with China so called Belt and Road initiative
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom