EndangeredSpecies
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 1,333
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Lol, just like how they were treated in east Pakistan ?
Why Khalistan is being questioned on Justin Trudeau's India's Visit ?
- Thread starter shootingstar
- Start date
MultaniGuy
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,243
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
I agree the Bengalis were treated badly.
Lol look your own country how it treats Muslims, Christians, and Parsis. I heard stories of lynching Muslims and Christians in India.
So dont give me crap. Also the Mukti Bahini commitedd crimes against the Muslim Bihari community in East Pakistan.
kmc_chacko
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2008
- Messages
- 1,076
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
If he is serious about trade and economy then he should understand what Indian's think otherwise he is free to create Azad Khalistan inside Canada.
90% Sikhs live in India without any issues and not bothered about Khalistan, but in PDF asking for referendum to satisfy 10% in which not even half is not favour of Khalistan, its truly funny.
third eye
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2008
- Messages
- 18,519
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
Which is alright , Indian leaders too have to think of their voters.
I dont understand why posters here are fretting about it, thats how Politics works
pothead
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2017
- Messages
- 4,109
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
When ever I visit these kinds of threads, I get a good kick and a hearty laugh.
We all get to see the fantastic, delusional and idiotic fantasies of Pakistanis where they dream of breaking India. They know it won't happen and they know they can't do it. Yet, they keep dreaming, all the while loosing parts of their own country
What a bunch of.........
We all get to see the fantastic, delusional and idiotic fantasies of Pakistanis where they dream of breaking India. They know it won't happen and they know they can't do it. Yet, they keep dreaming, all the while loosing parts of their own country
What a bunch of.........
Chhatrapati
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2016
- Messages
- 11,579
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Typical Pakistani who knows nothing about Sikhism or Sikhs but get their emo's up on hearing 'Khali' Stan. You see that's the symbol of Sikhism. It's called Kaithal if wearing it makes one gangsta then take a look at Haryana
BABA AGHORI
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2015
- Messages
- 1,389
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
That's funny, Like India is planning to vacate it's part of punjab.Wrong map. Muslims have no plan in vacating West Punjab. West Punjab is Muslim land.
This is the correct map of Khalistan.
Sikhs just want Indian Punjab, not Pakistani Punjab.
PM Justin Trudeau will soon give a courageous statement that he's not supporting any Khalistan movement because Buzdil Indian slaves of the west is scared of the Khalistani supporters in Canada & Trudeau's support. And with that statement PM Trudeau will put Modi & India in its place
Month after month, year after year anything happens in Balochistan, KPK you will hear people talking Pakistan should support Khalistan, Sikkim, Nagaland, Assam, Tamil, etc, but it will be all talk no action.
Pakistan is running around the world to save its sanctions now & dream of having friendly relations with brother Iran, Afghanistan & the Middle East. Nobody visits Pakistan. Nobody cares about Pakistan. You can keep screaming everywhere & nobody will bother to your voices rather mock at you.
At the end lut pit ke, you will surrender to India & say we are the same culture, our ancestors were Hindus & we should shed all our hatred since we are brothers. In next 2-3 years you will see many sane people raising the voice in Pakistan to normalize relations with India even give up Kashmir for prosperity
Month after month, year after year anything happens in Balochistan, KPK you will hear people talking Pakistan should support Khalistan, Sikkim, Nagaland, Assam, Tamil, etc, but it will be all talk no action.
Pakistan is running around the world to save its sanctions now & dream of having friendly relations with brother Iran, Afghanistan & the Middle East. Nobody visits Pakistan. Nobody cares about Pakistan. You can keep screaming everywhere & nobody will bother to your voices rather mock at you.
At the end lut pit ke, you will surrender to India & say we are the same culture, our ancestors were Hindus & we should shed all our hatred since we are brothers. In next 2-3 years you will see many sane people raising the voice in Pakistan to normalize relations with India even give up Kashmir for prosperity
Last edited:
GodToons
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,570
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
One Dalit (Mandal) trusted on Jinna of Secular society, became Education minister post 1947 in Pakistan. Once Jinna died, he has to run away from Pakistan and had to spend his last years in Kolkota repenting his decision to support for Pakistan. Get real baby.
AUSTERLITZ
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2008
- Messages
- 6,025
- Reaction score
- 175
- Country
- Location
The only khalistanis are jokers sitting in britain and canada.It has no support in India.The sikhs here are part of the bureaucratic and military elite of India.The khalistan idea is simply a joke in practical terms.It would be a small landlocked entity with no natural resources except agriculture,no ports to trade with the world,no real industry or tech hubs to equip and defend itself.If anti-india,it could only delve into being a puppet state of pakistan,which is what ISI dreams of.Every thinking man understands this very clearly,that is why khalistan militancy was defeated by officer k.p.gill and other sikh officers themselves.The whole khalistan issue was a result of dirty politics by indira gandhi to win votes in Punjab and the disastrous formula of mixing religion and state affairs which always ends in catastrophe.
third eye
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2008
- Messages
- 18,519
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi routinely lands up at the airport to receive world dignitaries. From the moment a world leader sets foot on Indian soil, Modi's photo ops begin. Who can forget the famous Modi hug reserved for world leaders?
Modi's Canadian counterpart, Trudeau, is equally an ace at producing visuals of himself doing things. When they landed in New Delhi on February 17 on the beginning of the Canadian prime minister's week-long trip to the country, the Trudeaus came out of the plane with a namaste, the traditional Indian greeting. But Modi wasn't there to receive them. No Modi hugs for Trudeau. Instead, Modi sent his junior minister for agriculture. Modi hasn't even welcomed Trudeau to India on Twitter, instead busying himself campaigning for a state election in the south.
It gets worse. The beautiful, photogenic Trudeaus went to see the Taj Mahal in Agra, where they were welcomed not by the provincial chief minister, not even a junior minister, but by district officials. Still, the Trudeaus managed to make memorable visuals at India's famous mausoleum of love. Modi often likes to take visiting dignitaries to Ahmedabad in Gujarat, his home state. Many good visuals have been produced in Gujarat with Modi showing world leaders around Mahatma Gandhi's Sabarmati Ashram or just taking them around the city. But the Trudeaus had to go alone to Gujarat, where they wore ethnic Indian clothes to visit a Hindu temple and Gandhi's abode.
There seems to be no end to the Indian snubbing of the Canadians, even as the Trudeaus are trying their best to disarm the Indians with a charm offensive.
Why is India being so rude to Trudeau? Answer: It has to do with the Sikhs.
India has often accused Canada of sheltering Sikh separatists. Sikhs in Canada form a voting bloc for Trudeau, so much so that he even attended a Khalsa Day parade organized by a radical Gurudwara, or Sikh temple, in Toronto. Some Sikh Gurudwaras in Canada have also barred the entry of Indian diplomats.
The violent Khalistan movement in the 1980s wreaked havoc in Punjab, resulting in India crushing the Khalistan militancy. After the Indian army cleared the Golden Temple of militants, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her own Sikh bodyguards in 1984. Anti-Sikh riots followed in Delhi and elsewhere, killing thousands of Sikhs. The next year, Khalistan militants blew up an Air India plane flying from Canada to Mumbai.
Sikh, numbering less than half a million, form the largest ethnic group among Indian-origin Canadians. All four of Trudeau's Indian-origin ministers are Sikh, and Trudeau has publicly boasted how he has more Sikh ministers than Modi. Amarinder Singh, chief minister of the Sikh-dominated state of Punjab and himself a Sikh, has publicly accused Trudeau's ministers of having sympathies with Canadian Sikh extremists who would like to see Indian Punjab separated from India into the state of Khalistan. Last year, Singh had refused to meet Trudeau's defense minister, Harjit Singh Sajjan. All four Sikh ministers have recently visited India, and New Delhi would have liked it if Trudeau didn't bring them along again. But for Trudeau, this trip is all about the Sikh vote in Canada.
As the Khalistan issue simmers between India and Canada, New Delhi wants Trudeau to publicly affirm Canada's commitment to "the unity and integrity of India." Speaking on Monday, Trudeau said Canada supported "one united India." At the same time, Trudeau is going around making noises about India's diversity and pluralism, which will be read by Sikhs back home as having given India the message.
Canada's position is that it cannot curtail the right to freedom of speech and expression of its Sikh citizens, but New Delhi wants Trudeau to publicly distance himself from Sikh separatists. As the two sides were unable to resolve the tension by the time Trudeau landed in New Delhi, the aim of Modi's snub is to mount pressure on the Canadians. Modi will meet Trudeau only toward the end of his week-long India visit. There's time for a detente.
As Trudeau goes around discovering India, hectic backroom negotiations are on between the two countries. Trudeau wasn't planning to meet Amarinder Singh, given the Indian leader's comments against Trudeau's Sikh colleagues. But the Canadians have relented, and the two will meet soon.
Ironically, Trudeau's visit was meant to mend fences with India, given that India has made clear its disapproval of Trudeau's appeasement of Sikh separatists. It's the sort of thing, India fears, that could reignite Sikh extremism in Indian Punjab.
Trudeau has to choose between not reigniting Sikh separatism in India and keeping some of his voters happy. He can't have both. If India was to start supporting Quebec separatists, it can't imagine that Canada would have good relations with India. It works both ways.
- - -
source NDTV
Modi's Canadian counterpart, Trudeau, is equally an ace at producing visuals of himself doing things. When they landed in New Delhi on February 17 on the beginning of the Canadian prime minister's week-long trip to the country, the Trudeaus came out of the plane with a namaste, the traditional Indian greeting. But Modi wasn't there to receive them. No Modi hugs for Trudeau. Instead, Modi sent his junior minister for agriculture. Modi hasn't even welcomed Trudeau to India on Twitter, instead busying himself campaigning for a state election in the south.
It gets worse. The beautiful, photogenic Trudeaus went to see the Taj Mahal in Agra, where they were welcomed not by the provincial chief minister, not even a junior minister, but by district officials. Still, the Trudeaus managed to make memorable visuals at India's famous mausoleum of love. Modi often likes to take visiting dignitaries to Ahmedabad in Gujarat, his home state. Many good visuals have been produced in Gujarat with Modi showing world leaders around Mahatma Gandhi's Sabarmati Ashram or just taking them around the city. But the Trudeaus had to go alone to Gujarat, where they wore ethnic Indian clothes to visit a Hindu temple and Gandhi's abode.
There seems to be no end to the Indian snubbing of the Canadians, even as the Trudeaus are trying their best to disarm the Indians with a charm offensive.
Why is India being so rude to Trudeau? Answer: It has to do with the Sikhs.
India has often accused Canada of sheltering Sikh separatists. Sikhs in Canada form a voting bloc for Trudeau, so much so that he even attended a Khalsa Day parade organized by a radical Gurudwara, or Sikh temple, in Toronto. Some Sikh Gurudwaras in Canada have also barred the entry of Indian diplomats.
The violent Khalistan movement in the 1980s wreaked havoc in Punjab, resulting in India crushing the Khalistan militancy. After the Indian army cleared the Golden Temple of militants, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her own Sikh bodyguards in 1984. Anti-Sikh riots followed in Delhi and elsewhere, killing thousands of Sikhs. The next year, Khalistan militants blew up an Air India plane flying from Canada to Mumbai.
Sikh, numbering less than half a million, form the largest ethnic group among Indian-origin Canadians. All four of Trudeau's Indian-origin ministers are Sikh, and Trudeau has publicly boasted how he has more Sikh ministers than Modi. Amarinder Singh, chief minister of the Sikh-dominated state of Punjab and himself a Sikh, has publicly accused Trudeau's ministers of having sympathies with Canadian Sikh extremists who would like to see Indian Punjab separated from India into the state of Khalistan. Last year, Singh had refused to meet Trudeau's defense minister, Harjit Singh Sajjan. All four Sikh ministers have recently visited India, and New Delhi would have liked it if Trudeau didn't bring them along again. But for Trudeau, this trip is all about the Sikh vote in Canada.
As the Khalistan issue simmers between India and Canada, New Delhi wants Trudeau to publicly affirm Canada's commitment to "the unity and integrity of India." Speaking on Monday, Trudeau said Canada supported "one united India." At the same time, Trudeau is going around making noises about India's diversity and pluralism, which will be read by Sikhs back home as having given India the message.
Canada's position is that it cannot curtail the right to freedom of speech and expression of its Sikh citizens, but New Delhi wants Trudeau to publicly distance himself from Sikh separatists. As the two sides were unable to resolve the tension by the time Trudeau landed in New Delhi, the aim of Modi's snub is to mount pressure on the Canadians. Modi will meet Trudeau only toward the end of his week-long India visit. There's time for a detente.
As Trudeau goes around discovering India, hectic backroom negotiations are on between the two countries. Trudeau wasn't planning to meet Amarinder Singh, given the Indian leader's comments against Trudeau's Sikh colleagues. But the Canadians have relented, and the two will meet soon.
Ironically, Trudeau's visit was meant to mend fences with India, given that India has made clear its disapproval of Trudeau's appeasement of Sikh separatists. It's the sort of thing, India fears, that could reignite Sikh extremism in Indian Punjab.
Trudeau has to choose between not reigniting Sikh separatism in India and keeping some of his voters happy. He can't have both. If India was to start supporting Quebec separatists, it can't imagine that Canada would have good relations with India. It works both ways.
- - -
source NDTV
Similar threads
