What's new

Why is Indian Air Force Tajikistan's Ayni Air Base Idle?

CONNAN

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
3,381
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
United States
Why is Tajikistan's Ayni Air Base Idle? | EurasiaNet.org

Ayni air base in Tajikistan was supposed to become a showpiece for India. In the mid-2000s, India's military began renovating the facility, and New Delhi appeared poised in 2006 to announced that Ayni had become operational. But four years later, the base sits largely dormant - an airfield without any fighter jets.

IAF_base.jpg


The reason that Ayni is still idle, many in Dushanbe believe, is Russia: Moscow does not want any other country to have use of the base. "They [Tajik officials] don't know what to do with this airbase. We don't need it for ourselves, but to give it to someone else would create problems with other countries," said Faridoon Khodizoda, a political analyst in Dushanbe.

Information about the base is closely held. The Russian Embassy in Dushanbe did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesman at the Indian Embassy in Dushanbe said he could not comment on Ayni, but referred questions to the Ministry of Defense of Tajikistan. The Ministry of Defense did not respond to requests for comment.

2-raw-bases-in-tajikistan.jpg


India has renovated runways and hangars at Ayni, but the Indian government has never publicly stated what its longer-term intentions were for the base. Reports in the Indian press suggested that India hoped to base a squadron of MiG-29 fighter jets there, in an effort to bolster its political clout in Central Asia, and to create a counterweight to Pakistani influence in Afghanistan.

Analysts of India's military suggest those expectations may have been too ambitious. When the base renovations started in 2004, India did not have a clear plan as to how it would eventually utilize the facility, said one source close to the Indian armed forces, whose employer does not allow him to speak on the record. "The point, sadly, remains the same: While the Tajik government has kept doors open, at least in a limited sense, the government here [in India] hasn't quite gotten its act together about precisely what or how to leverage the opportunity," he said.

Some analysts said India's foray into base politics was motivated by a desire to play the role of great power. "India is playing a game," said Imran Baig, a Washington-based analyst of South Asian security. "To maintain a base with no aircraft is not expensive at all," he said. "But to deploy a high-tech fighter squadron full time at a remote location far from the country of origin is a very, very costly affair and can only be afforded by superpowers."

Still, India appears to want to keep the question of its presence at Ayni open. India's president, Pratibha Patil, visited Dushanbe last year, an indicator to both Indian and Tajik experts that India was still trying to court Tajikistan.

Indian engineers continue to work on construction projects at the base, including a "hotel," said one worker who spoke to EurasiaNet.org on condition of anonymity. But there were no Indian aircraft there, the worker added.

Meanwhile, in Dushanbe, analysts argue that the Tajik government may have been courting India with the intention of playing New Delhi off of Moscow, possibly hoping to get Moscow to offer more money for an exclusive lease to the base.

Russia's defense minister, Anatoly Serdyukov, said last year that Tajikistan and Russia would jointly use the base, but Tajikistan has never confirmed that. Russia, which already maintains a large military base for its 201st Division at Dushanbe, does not appear interested in actually using Ayni, but merely in keeping other countries from using it, said Zafar Sufiyev, editor in chief of the newspaper Ozodagon.

Meanwhile, Tajik leaders do not appear interested in allowing Russian forces to use the base. Tajikistan's president, Imomali Rahmon, recently suggested that Russia, which currently does not pay rent for the 201st base, should do so in the future. The two sides, however, agreed to put off that decision until 2014. Tajik-Russian relations have been tense of late, mainly because of Moscow's failure to support Dushanbe, either financially or diplomatically, in the construction of the Rogun Dam, which Tajikistan's government sees as vital to its future economic security. [For background see EurasiaNet's archive].

"Rahmon is not independent enough to say 'no' to Russia, and he's afraid to say 'yes' to anyone else," said Saymuddin Dustov, an analyst in Dushanbe. "So he does nothing."

There has been speculation that the United States., facing continuing uncertainty over the use of the Manas air base in Kyrgyzstan, might be interested in Ayni as a possible replacement. The Tajikistan government would allow US forces to use Ayni at the right price, said Safiyev. "If the government gets more for it than the Americans pay for Manas, they'll be interested," he said. "It's a market."

But Kenneth Gross, the US ambassador to Tajikistan, told EurasiaNet.org there are no discussions between the two countries over the use of Ayni.
 
Tajikistan: US Not Seeking Use of Ayni Air Base, Officials Insist

Tajikistan: US Not Seeking Use of Ayni Air Base, Officials Insist | EurasiaNet.org

July 6, 2009 - 8:00pm
Tajikistan News
Both Tajik and American sources are taking action to dispel rumors that the US military was offered access to the Ayni air base in Tajikistan, a facility currently earmarked for Russian use.

According to Russian news reports, Tajik leaders expressed a desire to grant the United States access to the strategically attractive air base, due in large part to Dushanbe's deteriorating relationship with Moscow, as well as the Tajik government's desperate need for income. President Imomali Rahmon and Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Robert Blake discussed the idea, according to some reports.

However, the US Embassy in Dushanbe now insists the base question was never the subject of serious talks. "This issue [. . .] was not discussed at all," an embassy spokeswoman told the CA-News.org news website on July 7. A Tajik government source seconded the American Embassy version. "The issue was not raised," the Tajik official said.

Tajikistan currently facilitates the transit of non-military goods to coalition forces in Afghanistan via its road and rail network. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev is scheduled to visit Tajikistan in August.
 
Ayni Base May be a Covert Post for our Intelligence RAW to Set up Listening Post, Keep Watch on Activities and a Very Good Base in Terms of Access route for Afghnaistan in Future :yahoo:
 
Why is Tajikistan's Ayni Air Base Idle? | EurasiaNet.org

Ayni air base in Tajikistan was supposed to become a showpiece for India. In the mid-2000s, India's military began renovating the facility, and New Delhi appeared poised in 2006 to announced that Ayni had become operational. But four years later, the base sits largely dormant - an airfield without any fighter jets.

IAF_base.jpg


The reason that Ayni is still idle, many in Dushanbe believe, is Russia: Moscow does not want any other country to have use of the base. "They [Tajik officials] don't know what to do with this airbase. We don't need it for ourselves, but to give it to someone else would create problems with other countries," said Faridoon Khodizoda, a political analyst in Dushanbe.

Information about the base is closely held. The Russian Embassy in Dushanbe did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesman at the Indian Embassy in Dushanbe said he could not comment on Ayni, but referred questions to the Ministry of Defense of Tajikistan. The Ministry of Defense did not respond to requests for comment.

2-raw-bases-in-tajikistan.jpg


India has renovated runways and hangars at Ayni, but the Indian government has never publicly stated what its longer-term intentions were for the base. Reports in the Indian press suggested that India hoped to base a squadron of MiG-29 fighter jets there, in an effort to bolster its political clout in Central Asia, and to create a counterweight to Pakistani influence in Afghanistan.

Analysts of India's military suggest those expectations may have been too ambitious. When the base renovations started in 2004, India did not have a clear plan as to how it would eventually utilize the facility, said one source close to the Indian armed forces, whose employer does not allow him to speak on the record. "The point, sadly, remains the same: While the Tajik government has kept doors open, at least in a limited sense, the government here [in India] hasn't quite gotten its act together about precisely what or how to leverage the opportunity," he said.

Some analysts said India's foray into base politics was motivated by a desire to play the role of great power. "India is playing a game," said Imran Baig, a Washington-based analyst of South Asian security. "To maintain a base with no aircraft is not expensive at all," he said. "But to deploy a high-tech fighter squadron full time at a remote location far from the country of origin is a very, very costly affair and can only be afforded by superpowers."

Still, India appears to want to keep the question of its presence at Ayni open. India's president, Pratibha Patil, visited Dushanbe last year, an indicator to both Indian and Tajik experts that India was still trying to court Tajikistan.

Indian engineers continue to work on construction projects at the base, including a "hotel," said one worker who spoke to EurasiaNet.org on condition of anonymity. But there were no Indian aircraft there, the worker added.

Meanwhile, in Dushanbe, analysts argue that the Tajik government may have been courting India with the intention of playing New Delhi off of Moscow, possibly hoping to get Moscow to offer more money for an exclusive lease to the base.

Russia's defense minister, Anatoly Serdyukov, said last year that Tajikistan and Russia would jointly use the base, but Tajikistan has never confirmed that. Russia, which already maintains a large military base for its 201st Division at Dushanbe, does not appear interested in actually using Ayni, but merely in keeping other countries from using it, said Zafar Sufiyev, editor in chief of the newspaper Ozodagon.

Meanwhile, Tajik leaders do not appear interested in allowing Russian forces to use the base. Tajikistan's president, Imomali Rahmon, recently suggested that Russia, which currently does not pay rent for the 201st base, should do so in the future. The two sides, however, agreed to put off that decision until 2014. Tajik-Russian relations have been tense of late, mainly because of Moscow's failure to support Dushanbe, either financially or diplomatically, in the construction of the Rogun Dam, which Tajikistan's government sees as vital to its future economic security. [For background see EurasiaNet's archive].

"Rahmon is not independent enough to say 'no' to Russia, and he's afraid to say 'yes' to anyone else," said Saymuddin Dustov, an analyst in Dushanbe. "So he does nothing."

There has been speculation that the United States., facing continuing uncertainty over the use of the Manas air base in Kyrgyzstan, might be interested in Ayni as a possible replacement. The Tajikistan government would allow US forces to use Ayni at the right price, said Safiyev. "If the government gets more for it than the Americans pay for Manas, they'll be interested," he said. "It's a market."

But Kenneth Gross, the US ambassador to Tajikistan, told EurasiaNet.org there are no discussions between the two countries over the use of Ayni.




Utter non-sense.
India wants a counterweight to Pakistan's influence in Afghanistan, By MIG 29s? They must be on drugs or something. US couldn't do shyt with F-16s and F-15s, how can India keep counterweight with MIG 29s against an adversary that doesn't fight in the air and which is a guerrilla faction rather than a formal force.
 
Utter non-sense.
India wants a counterweight to Pakistan's influence in Afghanistan, By MIG 29s? They must be on drugs or something. US couldn't do shyt with F-16s and F-15s, how can India keep counterweight with MIG 29s against an adversary that doesn't fight in the air and which is a guerrilla faction rather than a formal force.
penumbra is offline Report Post Reply With Quote
Who said we are going to fight with MIG29... Oh My who told we going to fight at all..... The purpose of the base is entirely for different reason. It doesnt take that much to understand.....
 
Utter non-sense.
India wants a counterweight to Pakistan's influence in Afghanistan, By MIG 29s? They must be on drugs or something. US couldn't do shyt with F-16s and F-15s, how can India keep counterweight with MIG 29s against an adversary that doesn't fight in the air and which is a guerrilla faction rather than a formal force.

When Mig-29 was based Pakistan didn't have better fighter than those Mig-29s. Now when Pakistan fielding better fighters, Mig-29s also undergoing upgrades and may be a better fighter in future.
 
Man its very simple they even don't have jets fill their own inventory so how they could fill into their foriegn air bases
 
This Airbase is not to be confused with that of Farkhor Air base, which is already being run by Indian forces. IIRC the Lion of Panjshir - Ahmed Shah Masood was airlifted to an Indian forces medical center in Farkhor Airbase for treatment immediately after he was targeted by the dastardly talitubbies a few days before 9/11.

A second airbase at Ayni is indeed an interesting development. I believe its only a matter of time before both these bases host a squadron of aircraft of IAF. At more knowledgeable people - is it that a squadron is to be shared between the two bases or is it going to be separate squadrons at each airbase. What do you think? What kind of aircraft would conveniently suit Indian interests and what kind of aircraft can IAF actually field?

2-raw-bases-in-tajikistan.jpg

(lol at comments on the map by ansari - what an idiot!)

If one looks at the locations of the airbases, the Farkhor is conveniently located just north of Afghan border while the Ayni base is located at a strategically safe position north of Pak border and west of China border. Is it because of the sensitivities involved that India has not initiated basing fighter aircraft at those bases?
 
Utter non-sense.
India wants a counterweight to Pakistan's influence in Afghanistan, By MIG 29s? They must be on drugs or something. US couldn't do shyt with F-16s and F-15s, how can India keep counterweight with MIG 29s against an adversary that doesn't fight in the air and which is a guerrilla faction rather than a formal force.

Penumbra--

Its not about Mig 29's -- IAF might as well base Mig 21 over there.. What it will do is, create pressure on PAF-- they have to monitor Farkhor base all the time if Mig 29 fighters are based there and on top of that they have to maintain a fighter squadron or whatever to defend agains these threat -- This ties up the PAF threats !! If pakistan doesnt monitor Farkhor air base then IAF will be free to conduct reccee missions and maybe even take on aggressive missions if situation demands it !!
 
Man its very simple they even don't have jets fill their own inventory so how they could fill into their foriegn air bases

well thats why we are going for

MMRCA
LCA
PAK FA
MCA
SU30 mki

we need too find more and significant to counter china and Pakistan and the best planes should be there
 
well thats why we are going for

MMRCA
LCA
PAK FA
MCA
SU30 mki

we need too find more and significant to counter china and Pakistan and the best planes should be there

Man im not ur enemy not even PAF is against IAF, its the IAF that makes enemies and they used to show agression that's why PAF used to teach them lessons every time. I think u would like to talk about the latest intrusion by IAF Su-30 MKIs in Lahore sector and Mirage-2000s in Kashmir sector, our air defence has detected ur planes and could easily engaged them but they didn't done that bcoz of two reasons that are :
1.They were within the 15 K.m international border limits of Pakistan that India and Pakistan allowed not to engaged in an non-offensive scenario.
2.This was considered the main reason according to many Media personal that was the foreign pressure on Pakistan to not to engaged them, but they have been warned this time and if IAF tries to repeat the same mistake once again they are going to pay a hefty price for that.:sniper:
Although we have a very god and potent intelligence network in India that might have warned our military about the intrusion of IAF many days ago.
Hey Indian Bro don't take it seriously and i repeat no offensive with you or any civilians of India.:pakistan::china: And remember its not easy to Kill PAF & PLAAF jets so easily.:cheers::china::pakistan::cheers:
 
Man im not ur enemy not even PAF is against IAF, its the IAF that makes enemies and they used to show agression that's why PAF used to teach them lessons every time. I think u would like to talk about the latest intrusion by IAF Su-30 MKIs in Lahore sector and Mirage-2000s in Kashmir sector, our air defence has detected ur planes and could easily engaged them but they didn't done that bcoz of two reasons that are :
1.They were within the 15 K.m international border limits of Pakistan that India and Pakistan allowed not to engaged in an non-offensive scenario.
2.This was considered the main reason according to many Media personal that was the foreign pressure on Pakistan to not to engaged them, but they have been warned this time and if IAF tries to repeat the same mistake once again they are going to pay a hefty price for that.:sniper:
Although we have a very god and potent intelligence network in India that might have warned our military about the intrusion of IAF many days ago.
Hey Indian Bro don't take it seriously and i repeat no offensive with you or any civilians of India.:pakistan::china: And remember its not easy to Kill PAF & PLAAF jets so easily.:cheers::china::pakistan::cheers:

Oh yeah i understand as one among PAF or PLAAF is blessed by heavens:rofl:.And the only cursed one's are the IAF .Guess wat why to fire a Sam throw a pakistani stone and im sure IAF planes will be down in a moment...
 
Oh yeah i understand as one among PAF or PLAAF is blessed by heavens:rofl:.And the only cursed one's are the IAF .Guess wat why to fire a Sam throw a pakistani stone and im sure IAF planes will be down in a moment...

We really wanted to show that to you just bring another plane close to our territory and Inshallah you will not going to be disappionted.:rofl::pakistan:
 
Penumbra--

Its not about Mig 29's -- IAF might as well base Mig 21 over there.. What it will do is, create pressure on PAF-- they have to monitor Farkhor base all the time if Mig 29 fighters are based there and on top of that they have to maintain a fighter squadron or whatever to defend agains these threat -- This ties up the PAF threats !! If pakistan doesnt monitor Farkhor air base then IAF will be free to conduct reccee missions and maybe even take on aggressive missions if situation demands it !!

:lol: :lol: :rofl: :lol: :lol:
 
We really wanted to show that to you just bring another plane close to our territory and Inshallah you will not going to be disappionted.:rofl::pakistan:

What, u didnt recognized it? The plane that flew over ur house the other day? the one doing difficult sorties? u thought it ws jf-17?? or u might have thought it was PLAAF doing test flight of super stealth j-xxx :azn::wave:
 
Back
Top Bottom