gslv
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2011
- Messages
- 1,525
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Now you are surely gonna banned.
Why is india so poor?
- Thread starter Aalam1
- Start date
SpArK
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 5, 2010
- Messages
- 22,519
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
PlanetWarrior
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Messages
- 6,096
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
That wasn't necessary dude. Delete your post. It is in bad taste. Let him be an idiot without stooping to that level
I think you meant degraded and not elevated
Taygibay
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2010
- Messages
- 3,392
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2...k Force Report 2014_Press Release_English.pdf
or this list of least developed countries:
"Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kiribati, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tuvalu, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Vanuatu, Yemen and Zambia."
from : http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ldc2012_en.pdf
India is not on it.
The first challenge to economic success is the combination of geography and population.
India and China have together nearly half the world's population.
They thus face the biggest challenge. That they even still exist as entities after so many centuries ( a couple millennia even ) is a success marker, not one of failure.
What comes next is a coupling of system and power. Of the nations that have long running governance, those that projected their power have gained the most on average, with those that consolidated the gains over time doing the best.
Isolation from trouble comes next. The USA may not be so powerful if they did not have the two biggest oceans protecting them and had been forced to have wars fought on their soil. What I termed Geo-political Island-Nations in past works ( USA- Japan or UK for example ) combine a political power base with a geographic exclusion principle. They can fight for gain without the fight reaching them in return which over time makes their perspective of the world quite isolationist.
This allows leeway in treating problems whereas more imbricated lands ( both physically and relation-wise ) have to contend with sparing and sparring.
Last then comes a given system. In that respect, very centralized China ( not the CPC of today only but the historical strong central power since the first dynasties ) has an advantage over much more multicultural India. In the first, differences are erased for the common good favoring economic progress while in the second, differences being allowed to co-exist impede common good in the economic sense.
Last but maybe not least :
India ranks above Pakistan ( no disrespect intended, you asked Aalam1, I'm merely answering ) in all GDP-PPP lists so that honestly, your question may well be biased if not moot to begin with?
List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I hope this answers your query at least partially?
Good day all, Tay.
or this list of least developed countries:
"Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kiribati, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tuvalu, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Vanuatu, Yemen and Zambia."
from : http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ldc2012_en.pdf
India is not on it.
The first challenge to economic success is the combination of geography and population.
India and China have together nearly half the world's population.
They thus face the biggest challenge. That they even still exist as entities after so many centuries ( a couple millennia even ) is a success marker, not one of failure.
What comes next is a coupling of system and power. Of the nations that have long running governance, those that projected their power have gained the most on average, with those that consolidated the gains over time doing the best.
Isolation from trouble comes next. The USA may not be so powerful if they did not have the two biggest oceans protecting them and had been forced to have wars fought on their soil. What I termed Geo-political Island-Nations in past works ( USA- Japan or UK for example ) combine a political power base with a geographic exclusion principle. They can fight for gain without the fight reaching them in return which over time makes their perspective of the world quite isolationist.
This allows leeway in treating problems whereas more imbricated lands ( both physically and relation-wise ) have to contend with sparing and sparring.
Last then comes a given system. In that respect, very centralized China ( not the CPC of today only but the historical strong central power since the first dynasties ) has an advantage over much more multicultural India. In the first, differences are erased for the common good favoring economic progress while in the second, differences being allowed to co-exist impede common good in the economic sense.
Last but maybe not least :
India ranks above Pakistan ( no disrespect intended, you asked Aalam1, I'm merely answering ) in all GDP-PPP lists so that honestly, your question may well be biased if not moot to begin with?
List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I hope this answers your query at least partially?
Good day all, Tay.
pursuit of happiness
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2014
- Messages
- 4,205
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
T90TankGuy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 9,427
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Spark my dear man why are you bothering to reply to such an obvious troll thread?
Skull and Bones
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 18,601
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Muslims had been given ample opportunities to show their talents in our neighborhood, they ended up being poorer.
Allah Hu Akbar
Centrist
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2014
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Haha.. You have a lot of patience.
C
Come on.. Reading this thread has been fun after a long day's work
But yea.. It can turn ugly pretty fast.
Abingdonboy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 29,597
- Reaction score
- 46
- Country
- Location
I understand exactly why you started this thread but perhaps some education will help anyway:
Quite clealry explains why India (and China to a large degree) are poverty stricken right now BUT that they will return to their historic postions of being the global economic powerhouses.
Similar threads
