What's new

Why India no longer cares about Pakistan's nuclear threats

What this means is the very last move Pak can make is start a nuclear war, but India has the capacity to end the war.
yup, any one can start a war but how it ends is what matters. Kargil was a good example of what happened. Pakistan can be the first to use it but they wont be the last one.

pakistan has tried to take over kashmir by staging 3 to 4 wars since independence. Even after having nuclear weapons they are still trying to do the same but with no success. If pakistan had the confidence or capacity to use nukes they would have already done so.
 
Because... Indians are now 400% radiation-resistant. :partay: :partay:

Gwcdzvl.jpg


hjLB4Vg.jpg
have you ever been to selection center?
 
Lol another stupid analysis by some 3rd class writer

Indian army is the biggest terrorists in the region and they have numbers of time said they do all sorts of terrorists activities in Pakistan
 
The well known nuclear bluff of Pakistan.

Pakistan can't use nukes against India. They are only meant for sabre-rattling.

Even if they did, i don't mind having few nukes just to get the reason to eliminate whole pak from face of the earth. Though they won't surgical strikes proved that, China won't support Dokhlam standoff proved that. Its good time to push for war when pak is that weak. 2019 polls are coming anyway.
 
Even if they did, i don't mind having few nukes just to get the reason to eliminate whole pak from face of the earth. Though they won't surgical strikes proved that, China won't support Dokhlam standoff proved that. Its good time to push for war when pak is that weak. 2019 polls are coming anyway.

A nuclear war will make things very easy for India.

density.jpg


Pak isn't weak, it's India that's become strong. And the difference will only get wider.

The longer we wait, the less effective their nuclear weapons become. The conventional disparity is only going to get worse.
 
Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is real, but the threat of it actually being put to use is zero. It means Pakistan will not use nukes in a war with India. The answer is simply because India controls escalation.

What this means is the very last move Pak can make is start a nuclear war, but India has the capacity to end the war. We are not in an equal situation.



How much do you know about nukes and what they can do?

How many nukes do you have?
How powerful are these nukes?
How many nuke-tipped missiles can you fire?
How many missiles will actually work?
How many warheads will be taken out by EW and BMD?

How many cities and towns do we have?
How much of our population is urbanized?
How much of the non-urbanized population can your nukes kill?

How many of the troops on both sides will be alive after a nuclear exchange?
How quickly can you reinforce the troops killed in a nuclear attack?
How quickly can you take advantage of a nuclear attack?

Do you even know what's the meaning of MAD and how MAD is achieved?

Find the answer to all these questions and you will know that you have no clue what you are talking about.

There are many factors that compel India in not attacking Pakistan. And although nuclear weapons are high up on the list, it's not on top of the list.

If we ever go to war, it will happen in such a way that we will win. And we will win in such a way that we will still remain a credible threat to China.
Lol amazing delusions. Here is the truth in a concise and simple manner...India has an edge over Pak conventionally but no advantage currently exists in India's favor(it's purely bs invented by u) when it comes to nuclear weapons. Both India and Pak would be destroyed.

If u think that India would be able to survive and only Pak would get destroyed completely
- ...and that India somehow has an edge over Pak when it comes to nuclear weapons
- ...in addition to an already existing conventional superiority
- ...while Pak's nuclear posture is a bluff

...then what exactly is stopping India from taking Pakistani Kashmir?
 
Lol another stupid analysis by some 3rd class writer

Indian army is the biggest terrorists in the region and they have numbers of time said they do all sorts of terrorists activities in Pakistan


That's not what the world thinks

THE world led by Trump USA are actually saying Pakistan is the biggest terrorist supporters in the world

PAKISTANIS are stuck with that perception
 
That's not what the world thinks

THE world led by Trump USA are actually saying Pakistan is the biggest terrorist supporters in the world

PAKISTANIS are stuck with that perception

How is the world led by Trump?:lol: are you delusional that orange buffoon is ridiculed by many in his own country let alone the world

If india wasent concerned about Pakistan's nuclear warheads and missiles then they wouldn't be talking about them

India is 7 times larger in terms of population and 3 and a half times bigger in land mass we can never be equal in sheer numbers

BUT we don't need to be

You dont need to match your enemy if he is bigger then you, you just need to be able to hurt him reeeeeal bad, that he cant think of talking you on

That has been achieved and then some

It will be a blood bath if india sends soldiers towards Pakistans borders and the indians know it and this dosent even take into account nuclear weapons

Pakistan has created an immense war machine on a budget and as Pakistan grows do will that war machine

 
How is the world led by Trump?:lol: are you delusional that orange buffoon is ridiculed by many in his own country let alone the world

If india wasent concerned about Pakistan's nuclear warheads and missiles then they wouldn't be talking about them

India is 7 times larger in terms of population and 3 and a half times bigger in land mass we can never be equal in sheer numbers

BUT we don't need to be

You dont need to match your enemy if he is bigger then you, you just need to be able to hurt him reeeeeal bad, that he cant think of talking you on

That has been achieved and then some

It will be a blood bath if india sends soldiers towards Pakistans borders and the indians know it and this dosent even take into account nuclear weapons

Pakistan has created an immense war machine on a budget and as Pakistan grows do will that war machine





Doesn't matter what indians say in public and on the net. It's all hot air. Actions in real life is the ONLY thing that counts and india is FAR TOO weak, powerless and incapable of doing anything to Pakistan. Events of the last 47 years proves this. All else is hot air and meaningless conjecture.
 
Doesn't matter what indians say in public and on the net. It's all hot air. Actions in real life is the ONLY thing that counts and india is FAR TOO weak, powerless and incapable of doing anything to Pakistan. Events of the last 47 years proves this. All else is hot air and meaningless conjecture.

Yes actions matter more than words.

Is that why, when India openly challenged Pakistan, that they had crossed into Pakistan and killed Pakistani citizens. Pakistan backed down. Not only Pakistan refused to carry out any retaliation, it even refused to even acknowledge the raid.

Any nation, with any self respect would have taken the opportunity carried out a reprisal raid, just on principal itself, since an enemy nation had openly claimed, that they had crossed into your country and killed your citizens.

It is empowering to talk about nukes, but when time comes, you even refuse to retaliate to a small scale raids.
 
Yes actions matter more than words.

Is that why, when India openly challenged Pakistan, that they had crossed into Pakistan and killed Pakistani citizens. Pakistan backed down. Not only Pakistan refused to carry out any retaliation, it even refused to even acknowledge the raid.

Any nation, with any self respect would have taken the opportunity carried out a reprisal raid, just on principal itself, since an enemy nation had openly claimed, that they had crossed into your country and killed your citizens.

It is empowering to talk about nukes, but when time comes, you even refuse to retaliate to a small scale raids.



So when did that happen? Please provide a credible and reliable source. That excludes indian sources. By the same token I could argue that Pakistani's BAT has come into indian territory and executed countless indian soldiers, beheading them on many occasions yet india was too weak too fight back despite being more than 7x bigger than Pakistan.

The fact remains that despite being more than 7x bigger than Pakistan and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege, india continues to remain too weak, powerless and incapable of fighting Pakistan. Making conjectures in the net proves nothing and is meaningless. If and when india ever becomes powerful enough to actually destroy Pakistan then come and talk. All else is simply retarded, delusional fantasies.
 
As I said, the objective is not just to take back the regions, but to also balkanize Pakistan while still having enough economic, diplomatic and military clout to counter China.

India does not have any policy or plan to balkanize Pakistan. If at all it happens then it is purely a Pakistan's making. India only cares about AJK & GB.
 
India does. During Kargil War, our generals wanted to cross over and take it all.

Pak doesn't have the ability to defend the area.
:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
Have your generals been sleeping for 70 years then?
Come take it if you are really your mothers sons you dirty smelly indians.

you will leave Azad Kashmir in a body bag with the heads missing.
 
:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
Have your generals been sleeping for 70 years then?
Come take it if you are really your mothers sons you dirty smelly indians.

you will leave Azad Kashmir in a body bag with the heads missing.


They're all talk. indians are hot air. They won't do anything in reality. Just talk big. Nothing else. Let the dogs bark. They have no bite.
 
These Indians have lost sanity LOL

Ranting like a donkey.

Say that you don't care, but write a whole essay on the subject...
 
Back
Top Bottom