Yeah, Trinidad and tobago, triple h, etc all came from thiru of sanskrit like tripura. The other two cities which you mentioned are dominated by proto dravidians, so not suprised by the names.
"Trinidad" comes from the Spanish name "trinity" which was given to the island when it was under spanish control till 1797.
Do you know how the wife of your "tamil god Shiva" is addressed ? Its "Lalitha
Tripura Sundari".
It is again a Sanskrit name where "Lalitha" means "playful or one who plays", "
Tripura" because Parvati is the daughter of Himavat, king of the Himalayas.
"Tripura" here literally means "Highlander". "Sundari" sanskrit for Beautiful.
Is that "Tamil" too ? Its not, its sanskrit.
"Thiru maal" used in the oldest tamil literature tolkappiyam, which dates back to 300bc, instead of making your claim from thin air furnish the details where the word "thiru" was used before 300bc in sanskrit literature. In sanskrit if you are using"thiru" then you are using the Tamil word.
See that is the problem. There is NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL evidence for your claim that tamil is 300 BC old.
Its pure speculation and wishful thinking.
By that same standard, Saskrit is 10,000 years old. It is literally the mother of half the worlds language.
The oldest "Evidence" you have about tamil language age is from Anaimalai inscription which is ironically in the North India "Brahmi" script. Worse it gives the date as Kali year 3871 (Karttika, Sunday) equivalent to 770 A.D.
It gets worse, the Kali year is a "North Indian" concept in existence right from the Vedas.
Now "tolkappiyam" itself was written by students of Rishi Agastiyar who is a Vedic Rishi. Rishi Agastya is the son of "north Indian" Rishi Pulastya.
Rishi Agastya is also the brother of Rishi Visrava's who is the father of the infamous Ravan (Ramayana)
Rishi Agastya also wrote the north Indian scripture "Agastya Samhita" which exist even today.
Finally in Rg. Veda the world for "grow higher" or "climb higher" is "
aTiruh". It does not get any older than that.
Even some International linguistic experts claim tamil is much older than IVC, sumerian and dates tamil back to the nubian times of sub-saharan africa. For anyone who knows tamil, its not rocket science, just search in YouTube "cameroon tamil" you will find lot of videos, mofu tribes of cameroon uses lot of tamil words which are still in use with us even today.
I am sure there are even more Fantastic Claims. The migration from Africa happend 70,000 years ago.
So are you now claiming Tamil is 70,000 year old ? Take a reality check and learn to apply "reason".
It's not a pure linguistic coincidence, even genetics talks for it. Below is the link from university of illionis, which published the haplography of Y-Chromosome for all the ethnic groups in the world.
Sub saharan Cameroon people have RR1 haplography, which is significantly found only with two groups, it's dravidians and australian aboriginals. Other subsaharan haplography "J" is found significantly with middle eastern arabs, turks,uzbeks and dravidians. This two significant haplographic y-chromosome are found only in dravidians not in indo-europeans. Why this two haplographic y-chromosome more important than the others? These are the two which never evolved/changed over time in dravidian gene pool.
Genetics changes that are 70,000 years old have little role to play in origin of languages which are 2000 years old.
No one with even an iota of common sense will make such absurd links.
Even japanese,korean linguistic experts are searching their language similarities with tamil, but it's only you guys crying tamil was derived from sanskrit. of course some sanskrit words mixed with tamil over time, we don't need to search in history to replace them with a tamil word, tamil in srilanka is still in its purest form already many people, tv channels, books replaced those words with pure tamil words, like "maithanam" replaced with "aadukalam" and so on.
I have no problems with even aliens trying to find similarity with tamil. Much less Japanese and korean.
I only have problem when Anglo inspired "Dravidian" politicos attempt to promote "Fiction" over "Facts". As you can see, such attempt will come to an embarrassing end when you actually meet someone who knows his $hit.
These bravado's and false claims are only useful when dealing with the Ignorant Masses.
No amount of trying to rewrite History to suite the Anglo Dravidian agenda will help. Ultimately "Satyameva Jayateh" or "truth will always triumph".
....and yes, that is Sanskrit too.
on the other day you were claiming on a different thread that 80%malayalam has sanskrit words. Oops, again it's a mallu who will do anything for their survival. Yup, during the British period the malayam was derived from english, isn't?
