What's new

Why has no country supported India's claim of Pakistan being responsible for Uri?

Chinese-Dragon

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
33,932
Reaction score
52
Country
China
Location
China
There seems to be a lot of talk about India trying to "isolate" Pakistan.

Yet Russia is currently undergoing military drills with Pakistan, while the USA laughed at India's claims on Balochistan. China obviously stands firm with Pakistan.

So who is really isolated here? Why hasn't a single country supported India's claim that the Pakistani government is to blame for the Uri attack?

(Not mentioning all the claims of future "surgical strikes" that have been constant for the last few years).
 
. . . . .

India just sold their sovereignty to US military troops by signing the LEMOA right?

So I'll quote directly from their spokesperson on the page you linked:

United States – State Department spokesperson John Kirby said, "The United States strongly condemns the terrorist attack on an Indian army base in Kashmir during the early morning of September 18. We extend our condolences to the victims and their families. The United States is committed to our strong partnership with the Indian government to combat terrorism."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Uri_attack#cite_note-65
(Notice no mention of Pakistan at all? :P)
 
.
.
There seems to be a lot of talk about India trying to "isolate" Pakistan.

Yet Russia is currently undergoing military drills with Pakistan, while the USA laughed at India's claims on Balochistan. China obviously stands firm with Pakistan.

So who is really isolated here? Why hasn't a single country supported India's claim that the Pakistani government is to blame for the Uri attack?

(Not mentioning all the claims of future "surgical strikes" that have been constant for the last few years).

Let us try to make an ratinal discussion...

My first question is that countries support other countries based on their interest...Why would someone would support another country just because some thing happened in far away land?....So for me i really did not value much with this so called support that countries provide to others...At end of the day, if any war happens, who will stand with you to provide logitics, Food, Energy security and other supplies, that is most important part in relationship..

Now in today's world, here is thought about allignment of world of real time support if anything happens between India and Pakistan.

1- China : Stand by Pakistan if India initiates the attack as it has an execuse as Pakistan as a victim. If Pakistan attacks India, then China will support with logistics, arms and money to Pakistan but will pretend to stay neutral as it may not like to side with Pakistan being an aggressor

2- US : US will never stand by India in both the scenarios. Reason is simple, US may like or do not like Pakistan, but in order to have a base in South Asia through Afganistan, it will not antagonize Pakistan in direct India and Pakistan conflict...Again, i am talking based on the histroy or relationship between India and US
3- Russia : On the Contrary, people might get delusioned that Russia started to ditch India, but Russia will stand by India at international level if India is attacked and continue to supply with Arms and other logistics to India.
4- Israel : They will stand by India.

Rest of the countries, i am not sure if it really matters to me if they really support or not. So i am not bringing up for discussion here.
 
.
Let us try to make an ratinal discussion...

My first question is that countries support other countries based on their interest...Why would someone would support another country just because some thing happened in far away land?....So for me i really did not value much with this so called support that countries provide to others...At end of the day, if any war happens, who will stand with you to provide logitics, Food, Energy security and other supplies, that is most important part in relationship..

Now in today's world, here is thought about allignment of world of real time support if anything happens between India and Pakistan.

1- China : Stand by Pakistan if India initiates the attack as it has an execuse as Pakistan as a victim. If Pakistan attacks India, then China will support with logistics, arms and money to Pakistan but will pretend to stay neutral as it may not like to side with Pakistan being an aggressor

2- US : US will never stand by India in both the scenarios. Reason is simple, US may like or do not like Pakistan, but in order to have a base in South Asia through Afganistan, it will not antagonize Pakistan in direct India and Pakistan conflict...Again, i am talking based on the histroy or relationship between India and US
3- Russia : On the Contrary, people might get delusioned that Russia started to ditch India, but Russia will stand by India at international level if India is attacked and continue to supply with Arms and other logistics to India.
4- Israel : They will stand by India.

Rest of the countries, i am not sure if it really matters to me if they really support or not. So i am not bringing up for discussion here.

That is very true, so why are all the Indian members on this forum screaming about how they have "successfully isolated Pakistan" when in fact it's almost the other way around?
 
.
There seems to be a lot of talk about India trying to "isolate" Pakistan.

Yet Russia is currently undergoing military drills with Pakistan, while the USA laughed at India's claims on Balochistan. China obviously stands firm with Pakistan.

So who is really isolated here? Why hasn't a single country supported India's claim that the Pakistani government is to blame for the Uri attack?

(Not mentioning all the claims of future "surgical strikes" that have been constant for the last few years).

They don't care, everyone has their own problems. Besides the war in Syria is at the top of the agenda. Pakistan and India always squabble....
 
.
@Chinese Dragon Russia acknowledged that Indian claimed attack originated from Pakistan:

We strongly condemn the terrorist attack against an army base in Jammu and Kashmir’s Uri in the early hours of September 18, which killed 17 and injured 30 service personnel. We offer our condolences to the families of the victims and wish a rapid recovery to all those injured.
Regarding the Pathankot Indian air base attack in January 2016, we are very concerned about the terrorist attacks near the Line of Control. We are also concerned about the fact that, according to New Delhi, the army base near Uri was attacked from Pakistani territory.
 
.
Oh Another Indian Media report.

Just like they did reports about

1: Russia canceling drills with Pakistan
2: Russia canceling Mi35 deal
3: Indian Op in AK and killing 20 militants
4: China ''denial'' of supporting Pakistan over Kashmir issue
5: Military given targets to strike inside Pakistan

Get a life losers, whole World is Laughing at you. You got no one on your side except Bangladesh and Afghanistan :lol:
 
.
They don't care, everyone has their own problems. Besides the war in Syria is at the top of the agenda. Pakistan and India always squabble....

That's the thing.

Going by this forum, India has:

1) Successfully isolated Pakistan on every global forum
2) Proved Pakistani involvement in Uri by "Pakistani markings" on the guns (since disproven)
3) Conducted several successful "cross-border raids" into Azad Kashmir (since disproven)
4) Has the support of every major country in the world against Pakistan, including China

I mean, what world are they living in? It's in fact the opposite, not a single country in the world has accused the Pakistani government of being behind the Uri attack.
 
.
That's the thing.

Going by this forum, India has:

1) Successfully isolated Pakistan on every global forum
2) Proved Pakistani involvement in Uri by "Pakistani markings" on the guns (since disproven)
3) Conducted several successful "cross-border raids" into Azad Kashmir (since disproven)
4) Has the support of every major country in the world against Pakistan, including China

I mean, what world are they living in? It's in fact the opposite, not a single country in the world has accused the Pakistani government of being behind the Uri attack.

No one cares my friend, it's simple, there are far more pressing concerns.
 
.
@Chinese-Dragon Similarly few months when Pakistan claimed it had evidence of India supporting terrorism in Pakistan and claimed the arrest of an Alleged Indian spy and followed it with a diplomatic campaign; not one country including China came forward and acknowledged it.

The fact of the matter is India and Pakistan is trading such accusations for decades it would make no sense for others to get embroiled in this.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom