why fossil fuels will never run out

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

I am a pretty smart guy , with dashing looks , and all that but I will go with the Braniac NASA scientist on this one

Global warming is bad and CO2 levels high ones are bad for planet

 

[ultron]

I am a pretty smart guy , with dashing looks , and all that but I will go with the Braniac NASA scientist on this one

Global warming is bad and CO2 levels high ones are bad for planet

Global warming is good and CO2 is good for the planet.

Sixteen-Year-Old Student Turns Banana Peels Into Bioplastic | Inhabitat - Sustainable Design Innovation, Eco Architecture, Green Building

Bioplastics rot. No use.

 

[applesauce]

jeeze, ya'll still debating with this idiot?

the same guy that said, and i quote
"God does not allow humans to have fusion so God said fusion needs 100 million C beyond physical capacity of humans."

meanwhile people are doing experiments in the trillions of degrees

 

[ultron]

jeeze, ya'll still debating with this idiot?

the same guy that said, and i quote
"God does not allow humans to have fusion so God said fusion needs 100 million C beyond physical capacity of humans."

meanwhile people are doing experiments in the trillions of degrees

Nothing can hold 100 million C sustained. Not a thing can withstand such high temperature sustained.

 

[applesauce]

Nothing can hold 100 million C sustained. Not a thing can withstand such high temperature sustained.

magnetic fields dont burn.

 

[Maarkhoor]

And what about the pollution fossil fuels cause?

Carbon Actually good for earth before life on earth Carbon levels are much higher and earth is greener than today only a myth. In green houses the pump more carbon to make the plants grow faster.

 

[ultron]

magnetic fields dont burn.

Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted. Where's that magnetic field going to come from? Even if fusion breaks even, where will the hydrogen come from? Getting hydrogen from water or methane is very energy costly. On Earth, fusion can only be energy negative, not energy neutral or positive.

 

[applesauce]

Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted. Where's that magnetic field going to come from? Even if fusion breaks even, where will the hydrogen come from? Getting hydrogen from water or methane is very energy costly. On Earth, fusion can only be energy negative, not energy neutral or positive.

i love how you move from,

"100 million c is impossible"
to
"sustained and contained 100 million c is impossible"
to
"energy neutral or positive for the process is impossible"

 

[ultron]

i love how you move from,

"100 million c is impossible"
to
"sustained and contained 100 million c is impossible"
to
"energy neutral or positive for the process is impossible"

Fusion only works with God and stars. It cannot work on Earth.

 

[applesauce]

Fusion only works with God and stars. It cannot work on Earth.

it already works on earth
its called a H-bomb

 

[ultron]

it already works on earth
its called a H-bomb

You cannot harness it. Fossil fuels FTW

 

[Hack-Hook]

Safe to say, without fossil fuels, there would be no modern society. You can see for yourself.

we can build a far more advanced. One instead. Clinging tu fossil fuels is like a child who don't want to be weaned.

 

[ultron]

we can build a far more advanced. One instead. Clinging tu fossil fuels is like a child who don't want to be weaned.

Fossil fuels is the most abundant, the most cost effective, the most environmentally friendly way. If you have an alternative, I'm all ears.

 

[Hack-Hook]

It's wrong. CO2 does increase temperature a tiny bit. That's how a CO2 meter measure CO2 level in the air. I have one such meter. But the effect is negligible because CO2 is a very weak greenhouse gas. Water vapor is much much stronger and when water vapor concentration varies over several percentage points over the course of a day, there is negligible impact on temperature. CO2 is only 0.04 of a percent. It has no effect on Earth's temperature.

one degree increase in earth temperature make havok in global weather. It mel polart ice caps which reduce earth capabilities to control its weather and the temperature it bring flood to many areas and drought to many other areas.

Fossil fuels is the most abundant, the most cost effective, the most environmentally friendly way. If you have an alternative, I'm all ears.

its not the most abundant that title belong to t solar power and are you aware how much the cost of producing energy from sun have reduced from 6 years ago and no its one of the least environmentally friendly ways of producing energy from the time you extract it to the time you consume it.

Nothing can hold 100 million C sustained. Not a thing can withstand such high temperature sustained.

you don't need to stand it all you need is to contain it .
And we have the means to contain small amount of at as what is important here is the energy not the temperature itself.

You cannot harness it. Fossil fuels FTW

300 year ago you could not even harness steam power but now you have all sort of engines .fifty years ago you could not harness fission but now its nearly old tech. harnessing fusion is no different.

 

[ultron]

one degree increase in earth temperature make havok in global weather.

It is relative. The Eemian interglacial, the one before the current Holocene interglacial, was nearly 4 C warmer than today. It was during the Eemian period that modern humans evolved. The current climate is relatively cool if you take things into perspective. Indeed, even without human intervention, Earth is on a rapid path towards recovery to a warmer state where temperature is higher and sea ice is much less than now.

Eemian - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

its not the most abundant that title belong to t solar power and are you aware how much the cost of producing energy from sun have reduced from 6 years ago and no its one of the least environmentally friendly ways of producing energy from the time you extract it to the time you consume it.

Solar panels are environmentally disastrous. There are certainly many toxic cancer causing agents used in them. The consequence will come to light very soon. Fossil fuels are all natural. They are not corrosive, not toxic, not dangerous.