What's new

Why BD Fares Better Than Pakistan: a Pak perspective

...wait ...I'm confused...the article says India+Vietnam+Srilanka+etc = 50 Billion dollor, but there is another thread saying India account for 40 billion $....
Which is correct?
Im unaware about that 50 billion figure, but the other part is correct.India imports some textlies as well.I'm expecting, this year, that figure will be around 5 billion USD.
 
I will leave it to other forum members to decide who is the fool.

You, started by comparing Bangladeshi textile industry with that of India, trying to demean Indian industry, which is much much bigger than that of Bangladesh to begin with.

Then you tried to prove you are some genius when it comes to economics.Too bad you had to face some cold hard facts.

There after ran towards history, about which you have little idea, squarely proved in my previous posts.A quick detour towards civics as well, definitely not your strong area, that one.

And now, you are clinging on to ethnicity.Do you really know what that word means ?

What next ? Mathematics ? With your track record over the last 3-4 posts, I have got my fingers crossed.



And hence the question, define ethnicity, and thereby point out its historical failures..Do you want me to quote all your posts together ?Answer my direct questions..Do you even have an iota of knowledge regarding what you are talking about ?

Gtfo of a BD-pakistan thread.

We don't need citizens of a multiethnic mess commenting.
 
Thread started as Bangladesh fares better than pakistan but all I see is Indian and bangalis fighting who is better
 
Gtfo of a BD-pakistan thread.

We don't need citizens of a multiethnic mess commenting.

Oh.. but it is you who had to commit the idiocy of comparing India with Bangladesh, isn't it ?Trying to sound intelligent ? And now, after being given a guided tour of all the subjects that you don't know head or tail about, this is all that you have to say ? That's just another way of saying you don't have any rebuttal.

Moral of the story-Don't ever blabber about things you have absolutely no idea about.What a sore loser.
 
Oh.. but it is you who had to commit the idiocy of comparing India with Bangladesh, isn't it ?Trying to sound intelligent ? And now, after being given a guided tour of all the subjects that you don't know head or tail about, this is all that you have to say ? That's just another way of saying you don't have any rebuttal.

Moral of the story-Don't ever blabber about things you have absolutely no idea about.What a sore loser.

OK. whatever.

We don't need input from a failure country.
 
Pakistan to Bangladesh..........................

Pak - "aaj mere pass GDP hai, nuke hai, Takla hai, tumharey pass kya hai"

BD - "Mere passss............Mere Pass HASINA hai!!!!!!"

toof-bumbum.jpg


:D
 
What you need is going back to school to get yourself educated about things you think you know about.


I have just realised how long you have been posting and the amount of posts you have made!

You are invisible to the forum loser as no one cares about your views:lol:
 
I have just realised how long you have been posting and the amount of posts you have made!

You are invisible to the forum loser as no one cares about your views:lol:

Let me worry about that.. You try answering the direct questions being asked to you..

Who said anything about being better than India ?

Indian textile exports back in 2011-'12 only stood at a figure of 33,161.74 million USD.That is only exports, not taking into account the huge internal market which happens to be one of the largest in the World.

While textiles export is the largest export commodity of Bangladesh, accounting for about 80% of total exports of 27 billion USD, standing at 21 billion USD, in case of India the same accounts for only 10% of total exports, and yet standing at around 33 billion USD. Those were some facts and figures you should consider before you start pretending to be intelligent and calling some economy failed.

Got any answer for that?

And what did you say ? "History teaches that multiethnic states always fail" ...
Always fails..so there must be lots of such examples that you can think of right now, correct ?
Okay.. lets make a quick switch to history and civics now... Some examples of failure of state for being multi-ethnic please ?And how exactly do you define failure here ? UK, for example has a rich multi-ethnic society. same with US,India, Russia, France etc etc...
Again, these are the very same countries which are flourishing in all aspects.

Answer that instead of beating around the bush.

1.First you were talking about multi-ethnic society.Now you are talking about dominant ethnicity.Why exactly changing the words? Is that ignorance or lack of attention ?

2. Define ethnicity. Also, if your definition of multi-ethnic means no dominant ethnicity and thereby an equal distribution, then point out a single country on the face of the earth having that.

3. Are you stupid or are you stupid ? Russia, the present Russia, has so many different ethnicity that it will take a few pages just to name them, let alone talking about them.UK has at least 10 different major ethnic classifications and that too broadly classified ones,same is the case with France, US, even much more than that.Pick up some books, educate yourself and stop embarrassing yourself time and again.

4.What happened to your examples of history ?Forgot about them already ? Is that attention deficit disorder ?

You shouldn't have tried name calling in the first place..Answer the direct questions..
 
shuntmaster said: ↑
Bangladesh exports $21Billion worth of garments, against $2.6Billion for Pakistan. That's very impressive.
that is the good news for Pakistan, we are not a sweatshop of the west.
But thats not stopping Pakistan from doing $2.6Billion worth of garment exports.
 
But thats not stopping Pakistan from doing $2.6Billion worth of garment exports.

Actually Pak textile exports are $14bn i think. Ofcourse must of the mills are not working because of energy shortage let alone new investment. Thats why many big Pakistani players shifted Bangladesh and invested billions of $ there.
 
As long as Pakistan is providing cheap clothing for its people, I don't care. Good luck Bangladesh
 
As long as Pakistan is providing cheap clothing for its people, I don't care. Good luck Bangladesh
You actually should.

Textiles is one of the best ways for poor countries to get income. The sector is a mass employment generator. Almost every country in the world has used textiles to lift itself up when it was poor.

It brings in a lot of employment, that is probably the best thing about it, along with that it can absorb poorly skilled people.
 
...wait ...I'm confused...the article says India+Vietnam+Srilanka+etc = 50 Billion dollor, but there is another thread saying India account for 40 billion $....
Which is correct?
Thats Textile and this thread is about garments.
 

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom