Why Aurangzeb's Reputation As A Tyrant And Bigot Doesn't Stand The Test Of History

[Optimus_Prime]

then you should also trust what majority of them think about the prophet and his tribe...

also by western standards u know what a person who marries 9 yr old is called.. but then ohh.. u will cry blasphemy.. blasphemy

Dont care what majority of them THINKS about the prophet or his wives. That is a matter of theology and politics. Important events of islamic civillazation are well documented by most western historians. Hindutva pseudo-science is rejected by virtually every non-hindu adademic.

 

[Mamluk]

And you're confused about tribe and civilisation. Tribe was Aryan where Vedic is civilisation.

There were numerous tribes not only one tribe. No single tribe called Aryan - they were all Aryan.

Text are 3000 year old but our history dates back to orgin of textual records.

There is no record of Aryan presence beyond 1400 BC, and that too in peninsular India. The oldest records, close to 1400 BC, are in Pakistan. Since then they have slowly conquered further into the peninsula. This is very similar to the Muslim invasions.

 

[WarFariX]

w

1) Killing several blood brothers to seize throne including rightful succeeder to throne Dara Shakoh
2) Imprisonment of Badshah Shahjaan (Father) to take reign of power and making him wish to die in life of seclusion.
3) Brutal torture & inhuman execution of Chhatrapati Sambhaji ( Son of Chhatrapati Shivaji)
4) Beheading of Sikh guru Teg bahadurs and his sons.
5) Execution of Sarmhad Kashani
6) Cutting Bhai Mati Das & Bhai Dayal Das into pieces with SAW on refusal to convert.
7) Killing of several muslims who dressed like Non Muslims.
8) Looting wealth from Somnath Temple , Kasava Deo Temple, Vishwanath Temple, etc and later demolishing them.
9) Massacre of around 700000 to 1200000 non muslims who refused to convert.
10) Banning diwali festival
11) Issuing orders of destructing non islamic schools, temple of infedals

View attachment 387507

( Order issued by Aurangazeb in 1669)


These are few points which makes Aurangazeb a genocide manaic and intolerant tyrant.

No other muslim ruler was comdemned and resisted by Indian masses as Aurangazeb was for his fanatical rules and policies.

well believe me tbh (with no hate intended) , MOdi is even more evil then .....

 

[Paragkhadse259]

Sorry dude but i trust western scholars, and most sane people do the same. Hindutva "historians" are just for laughs.

You trust Western scholars for history of India while you'll reject same for Islamic conquest and Prophet's life.

Double standards , haan ?

You laugh at our hindutva historians we find your hypocrisy funny [emoji23] [emoji13]

 

[Mamluk]

w

well believe me tbh (with no hate intended) , MOdi is even more evil then .....

Aurangzeb and Modi has one thing in common - both appoint Hindus as top generals. Aurangzeb had Jaswant Singh and Jaya Singh, and Modi has Bipin Rawat.

 

[Optimus_Prime]

You trust Western scholars for history of India while you'll reject same for Islamic conquest and Prophet's life.

We muslims do not reject bad behaviour of our ancestors. In fact we had numerous civil wars because our leaders went corrupt and tyrannic. Western historians, theology scholars and archaeologist have few disputes about our historical events. That cant be said about your fabricated "history" of 7000 yr old Bharat.

 

[Paragkhadse259]

Dont care what majority of them THINKS about the prophet or his wives. That is a matter of theology and politics. Important events of islamic civillazation are well documented by most western historians. Hindutva pseudo-science is rejected by virtually every non-hindu adademic.

That's because when vedic civilization was flourished in Subcontinent and exploring knowledge of astrology, ayurveda, cosmic science, mathematics most of western world was in nomadic stage.

You can't expect naked barbaric tribe dwellers to record history of Vedic civilization when their own history records during that period are not available.

Simple logic if you see. [emoji6]

 

[Optimus_Prime]

u cant compare a man who consistently wins elections... garnering even a huge amt of muslim. vote... with a megalomaniac medieval ruler who was obsessed with chutiya type jihad

You are right. Alamgir was a great man. Modi is a nobody pretending to be somethin hes not. His line is broken. This tells a lot about your mentality. You prime minister is neither a man or leader.

ohh. so. much for the islamic science (sorry for the oxymoron)...

lets wait for the sun and moon to rise together....
see thats why i hate every religion.. its full of pseudo science...

but muslims wont ever question this mumbo jumbo

 

[Paragkhadse259]

We muslims do not reject bad behaviour of our ancestors. In fact we had numerous civil wars because our leaders went corrupt and tyrannic. Western historians, theology scholars and archaeologist have few disputes about our historical events. That cant be said about your fabricated "history" of 7000 yr old Bharat.

Brother we all have our concepts.

Outsiders will always write things with their understanding and perceptions.

When I wish to know about Nabi (Pbuh) i will trust islamic texts more than any western historian. Same goes with my knowledge about Hinduism and Bharat.

 

[Paragkhadse259]

w

well believe me tbh (with no hate intended) , MOdi is even more evil then .....

Wake me up when Modi demolishes few non hindu worship places or beheads few non hindu religious gurus or massacres 700000+ guys who refused to convert.

 

[Dash]

Hitler is case in point.

He lost, so the victors (yanks, brits etc) degrade him. Jews paint him as evil (they have a point)

But he had some inspired ideas and transformed Germany before he went off the hook

There. Some ideas and a lot of bad that can't be fathomed as ideas in any case.

Anyway, I guess I have nothing more to say. I got what I wanted.

 

[WarFariX]

Wake me up when Modi demolishes few non hindu worship places or beheads few non hindu religious gurus or massacres 700000+ guys who refused to convert.

according to ur people , pak army raped million of women in some months and killed millions of bengalis...men who were just merely 30000 with moderate arming.....what else can we expect from such a coiuntry who distort history

thoda satak gaye ho kya? how can you compare modi and auranzeb? this is like a very childish attempt at getting back..

u cant compare a man who consistently wins elections... garnering even a huge amt of muslim. vote... with a megalomaniac medieval ruler who was obsessed with chutiya type jihad

well according to ur loguc , aurangzeb and modi have much in common then , quoting ur word jihad , modi is no different...shiv sena is answer for that....and the radical mindset of BJP leaders to cut offf people who slaughter gow mata and also rape dead buried muslim women...that is completely different tyranism and is beastiality which is abnormal minded

 

[Optimus_Prime]

Brother we all have our concepts.

Outsiders will always write things with their understanding and perceptions.

When I wish to know about Nabi (Pbuh) i will trust islamic texts more than any western historian. Same goes with my knowledge about Hinduism and Bharat.

Wake me up when Modi demolishes few non hindu worship places or beheads few non hindu religious gurus or massacres 700000+ guys who refused to convert.

Stop crying dude. Wars happen. People die. Thats life. Those victims you mentioned were fighting against mughals and lost. They paid the price. That happend during a time when leaders generally were ruthless. You know how many muslims died beacuse of our infighting? Supposedly 500 000 arab supporters of Umayaads were murdered during the Abbasid revolt. See what happen in Syria and Yemen today? Mans greed and lust for power transcends religious identity.

 

[Paragkhadse259]

according to ur people , pak army raped million of women in some months and killed millions of bengalis...men who were just merely 30000 with moderate arming.....what else can we expect from such a coiuntry who distort history


well according to ur loguc , aurangzeb and modi have much in common then , quoting ur word jihad , modi is no different...shiv sena is answer for that....and the radical mindset of BJP leaders to cut offf people who slaughter gow mata and also rape dead buried muslim women...that is completely different tyranism and is beastiality which is abnormal minded

Forget indian version of history, read this :

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archer_Blood

 

[my2cents]

Wonderful leader!!!!!! Indian muslims need another of such calibre to deal with the hindutva crowd

OP's main contention is that Aurangzeb was religiously motivated and whatever he did was to grab power and it is what was needed at that time to be an effective leader and we should not judge him by modern yardstick. Same can be said of other despots like Idi Amin and Hitler.

Do not pay attention to RSS gundas. They say mughals destroyed temples supposedly because of religious hatred.
Which is totally fabrication... Most historians agree mughals were NOT waging Jihad. They were actually quite tolerant and secular. Remember European genocide of amerindians took place in the same era. Mughals rule looke like a wark in the park in comparison. What hindutva goons never tell is that temples were used as foorts by mughal opponents. Numerous hindu kings and princes were participating on mughals side. Muslim Kingdoms too were destroyed by mughals.

You haven't read the OP. In one of the letter he acknowledges destroying Somnath temple to punish people for their idol worship.

Also show me one temple that was used as a fort??