I think is more like Stockholm syndrome. The Pakistanis glorify these invaders and celebrate their victories against the infidels while they forget that these Buddhist and hind infidels were their ancestors. So basically they are like the black African who is happy that his/her ancestors were enslaved because they were brought to Jesus. Or the native Americans who celebrate the European colonization of their lands because it brought them civilization. So basically Pakistanis celebrate the people who slaughtered their ancestors.
What a load of horse shit.
Pakistanis celebrate anyone who degrades or destroys Hindutva and its ability to function. Hindutva is the phenomenon that gleefully excuses shelling civilian homes on the ceasefire line if they are Muslim, raping Muslim minors, destroying Muslim mosques, using lethal force or pellet guns against protesters who are Muslim (also, see who is being beaten by RSS hit mobs in the circulating videos from recent protests, even though there is broad participation in the protests from non-Muslims), advocating rape and murder if the victim is Muslim. Pakistan and its armed forces take no joy from war and try to target the military only. This difference in mindset seems lost on you.
As for aurangzeb and ghazni, these names trigger inferiority complexes among Hindutva lovers, hence Pakistanis repeat such names regularly. A Bollywood actor called his son Timur not long ago, which irked Hindutva types also.
So as well as Pakistanis, some Indians will even invoke these names, triggering Hindutva in the process. It does actually create a hilarious reaction in the Hindutva pipsqueaks, running around in circles panicking like chickens, screaming as they do about f16s, Islam, revenge revenge revenge rape rape rape, and all sorts.
Notwithstanding the names themselves, some Hindus in the remote villages of India would actually benefit from an eradication of brahminism altogether. Cow urine drinking, child sacrifice, all sorts of animal abuse by torturing them for bizarre ritualistic purposes, mistreatment of Dalits and so on would vanish overnight if aurangzeb or ghazni had finished the job.
Put simply, if it wasn't for the mughals and other Muslim invaders, we'd all be stuck in such a grim cycle of despair.
These Brahmins are hardly comparable to native Americans or Africans. They would in fact be the first to enslave them or rape them. Brahmins would dalitise such peoples.
In fact, if native Americans had a Brahmin-type class within their hierarchy that abused other native Americans, (dalit kids get murdered for shitttin in the wrong place for God sake), then I would say many native Americans would gladly side with any invaders who controlled such local oppressors. Why do you think it was so easy for numerically inferior Muslim invaders to subdue a massively large Hindu population? It was extremely easy for mughals or the British or anyone else to exploit such a fractured society, where lower classes were more than happy to have Brahmins subdued and replaced by a better imperial ruler under whom they at least had a chance. Dalits back then and even now remain the biggest source of conversions to Islam, Christianity, or any damn thing to escape the wretched cycle of crap cleaning and watching your children aspire to be crap cleaners.
So yeah, I'm very pleased about the mughals, each and every one of them. They were liberators, some brutal, some not, but still liberators.
