LeGenD
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,813
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Situation is not as grim, IMO. A large number of Pakistani are peace-loving well-to-do individuals at present.Pakistan Army is like a anchor that keeps a fissiperous, explosive, radical, sectarian, ethnic cleavages tied together inside the country. We saw what happened in Syria, Iraq when central authority failed and those states abandoned territory to lawlessness where ISIS and countless other groups took root. Indeed Afghanistan next door to Pakistan which shares similar cultures and history is keeping US Army and good chunk of NATO busy for the last 17 years. Prior to that they kept the Red Army dancing. Pakistan is over 7 times more populous than Afghanistan.
You might wish Pakistan Army away. But be prepared to send in the entire US Army and rest of NATO for the next 3o years and enforce compulsory draft as you face Vietnam v2.0 on sterioids in Pakistan. Most of Pakistan is armed. Most make American gun lovers look like pacifists. That is why Obama said "Pakistan was his nightmare".
Yes, removal of Pakistan Army from the equation will leave a power vacuum and numerous entities will emerge and vie for control. Under these circumstances, chances of CIVIL WAR would increase tenfold. Similar to developments in Iraq.
US is smarter now. They routed ISIS from across the Middle East through a combination of precision strikes and some allies on the ground. A few thousand US troops were involved. Operation Inherent Resolve was the name of the game.
Even in Afghanistan, a few thousand US troops are involved at present. And it is possible that US will attempt something akin to Operation Inherent Resolve there.
Large overseas deployments become expensive over the course of time.
I agree with the gist of your argument that Pakistan Army is a vital source of stability in the country.