One of my comments I said I was against knocking down cyclists, so you need to read comments properly. I said in that case it wasn't murder.
What would you charge him with? You make no sense either.
The court considers him an extreme danger to the public. Maybe the guy has a record.
You've forgotten the whole discussion too, except to hung up on the part about me raising a technical point? Don't bother commenting about the issue if you aren't aware of what the conversation was about.
You said yourself the court oversentenced on this. And now respecting the courts opinion about what they think? Courts are just a random group of people aligned with elite class. Nothing more than that. They are not special. There's many public dangers the court doesn't care about one bit.
You can't answer a simple question. Don't be guilt tripping others.
I'm not guilt tripping. You forgot the whole conversation then lied about me supporting knocking cyclists down. I remember writing that I'm against it.
Being a repeat offender makes no difference to it being non-serious. You have to step away from the conditioning of the system. Do you think medieval knights had to deal with stupid shit like that? No, if they did an offense it was what it was. No stacking or any other bs like that.
I didn't read your posts to others. So what would you charge him with? The answer is not an essay. Simple question, simple answer. You would charge him with knocking the bicyclist down? That is what you have been saying. And the fact that he died, was that the bicyclist's fault? Seems, you have no concept of justice.
America is trying to turn its demographics to majority non white in next 10 years which can be done easily. Also America trying to de-masculine all men in America (especially white men) and turn them into sissys. Very good for the rest of the world tbh
