This article is a classical case of motivated propaganda by telling half lies.
I may not rebut each and every line as i am not a professional historian, but could rebut enough than a pattern of lying is established.
Here.
Already covered in debates on this thread.
The thing with treasury is that even a half wit knows that appointing anyone except the best man could bankrupt him.These are secular appointments under any regime.
example:
1. Jews, even though hated throughout west, held position of central banker and treasurars throughout Europe.
2. This year when BJP defeated Congress, they sacked all political appointees of Congress, but did not sacked RBI governer.
This is the biggest example of shamelessness in this whole article.
Both of these Generals were appointed by Shahjahan. Aurangzeb tolerated them for time being because they were one pf most powerful generals of Mughal army and would have broken Mughal Army.Aurangzeb was concerned enough about Jai singh's power that he did not embarked upon his "kill infidel" policy until Jai singh was dead.
His long term treatment of these Generals point to his bigotry rather than magnanimity.Here what happened to these generals.
Jai Singh I - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jaswant Singh of Marwar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the most stupid argument made by author with expectation that no one would check his claims.
1. It is disingenuous to compare two different metrics, in this case that of number of mansabdars vs administartive officials and claim superiority. Anyone falling for this is a low IQ retard.
2. The percentage of Hindu mansabdars ( let's compare a single metric ) fell from 21.74% at time of Aurangzeb's coronation to 16% after 7 year reign to 12% after 10 year of his reign.
http://aygrt.isrj.org/UploadedData/3930.pdf
Better not go into this.
ISIS also says that their Islam is proper Islam and wipe floor with non salafis during theology debate.
Oh, the age old Jiziya vs Zakat excuse.
For he who think both are same.
Jizya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1. The first point says that jizya was taken from dhimmis or the people of the book which means – Jews and Christians since Allah the all knowing did not know about Hindus ,Jains, Biddhists or american aboriginal religions. (So much for all knowing). These kind of kaffirs were not given the
choiceof jizya. For them the choices were – Conversion or Death.
Islam in it’s true form is nothing less than a large scale organised crime syndicate.
2. Muslims net wealth must exceed a minimum amount which is called Nisab. While all non-Muslims have to pay jizya the poor Muslims will be exempted from zakat because their net wealth will not exceed the Nisab.
Jizya is an indirect way of “Forced Conversion” since many poor non-Muslims will not be able to pay jizya.
3. The third point again reflects that a minimum wealth must be maintained by the Muslim to pay zakat. No such condition exists for the kaffirs.
4. There is no MAXIMUM amount of zakat, which means even the entire wealth of a non-Muslims can be taken as jizya. This is not the case with zakat. The max. amount is fixed and that too is not bounding on the Muslim.
5. Jizya is paid by all non-Muslims irrespective of age, wealth.
6. This point makes clear that zakat is optional for Muslim. On the contrary if a non-Muslims refuse to pay jizya his entire property and women folk can be taken captive by Muslim. The punishment for refusing to pay jizya is death – The Religion of Peace
7. The last point confirms that the entire idea of jizya is to humiliate, insult and belittle the non-Muslims.
Finally here is list of great deeds of Aurangzeb.
Hindu religious fairs were outlawed in 1668, and an edict of the following year prohibited construction of Hindu temples as well as the repair of old ones. Also in 1669, Aurangzeb discontinued the practice, which had been originated by Akbar, of appearing before his subjects and conferring
darshanon them, or letting them receive his blessings as one might, in Hinduism, take the
darshanof a deity and so receive its blessings. Though the duty (internal customs fees) paid on goods was 2.5%, double the amount was levied on Hindu merchants from 1665 onwards. In 1679, Aurangzeb went so far as to reimpose, contrary to the advice of many of his court nobles and theologians, the
jiziyaor graduated property tax on non-Hindus, and according to one historical source, elephants were deployed to crush the resistance in the area surrounding the Red Fort of Hindus who refused to submit to
jiziyacollectors. The historian John F. Richards opines, quite candidly, that "Aurangzeb's ultimate aim was conversion of non-Muslims to Islam. Whenever possible the emperor gave out robes of honor, cash gifts, and promotions to converts. It quickly became known that conversion was a sure way to the emperor's favor"
This list does not include murder of Sikh gurus which turned Sikhs into enemies of Islam to the extent that Sikhs forbid everything considered halal by Muslims.